This article reports research findings of an interview study conducted with parents of young children with special needs. The research was conducted to assess parental perceptions of infant and family services as proposed in P.L. 99--457. Parents emphasized their need to become knowledgeable about their child and about available services. They also stressed the importance of professionals relaying information and empowering families to become their own decision makers. The focused interview approach used in the study also is discussed as a family assessment strategy.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Blacher, J. (1984). A dynamic perspective on the impact of a severely handicapped child on the family. In J.Blacher (Ed.), Severely handicapped young children and their families (pp. 3--50). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
2.
Bogdan, R., & Biklen, D. (1982). Qualitative research for education.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
3.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1975). Is early intervention effective? In B. Friedlander, G. Sterritt, & G. Kirk (Eds.), Exceptional infant: Vol. 3. Assessment and intervention (pp. 449--475). New York: Brunner/Mazel.
4.
Darling, R.B., (1989). Using the social system perspective in early intervention: The value of a sociological approach. Journal of Early Intervention, 13,(1), 24--35.
5.
Dunst, C.J., (1985). Rethinking early intervention. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 5, 165--201.
6.
Dunst, C., Trivette, C. & Deal, A. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice.Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
7.
Elmore, R.F., (1980). Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly, 94,(4), 601--612.
8.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L., (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.Chicago: Aldine.
Odom, S.L., & Shuster, S.K., (1986). Naturalistic inquiry and the assessment of young handicapped children and their families. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6,(2), 68--82.
12.
Sameroff, A.J., & Chandler, M.J., (1975). Reproductive risk and the continuum of caretaking casualty. In F.D. Horowitz, M. Hetherington, S. Scarr-Salapatek, & G. Siegal (Eds.), Review of child development research (Vol. 4, pp. 187--244). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Turnbull, A.P., Blue-Banning, M.Behr, S. & Kerns, G. (1986). Family research and intervention: A value and ethical examination. In P.R. Dokecki & R.M. Zaner (Eds.), Ethics of dealing with persons with severe handicaps (pp. 119--140). Baltimore: Brookes.
15.
Turnbull, A.P., & Winton, P.J., (1984). Parent involvement policy and practice: Current research and implications for families of young, severely handicapped children. In J. Blacher (Ed.), Severely handicapped young children and their families (pp. 377--397). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
16.
Winton, P.J., (1988). The family-focused interview: An assessment measure and goal-setting mechanism. In D.B. Bailey & R.J. Simeonsson (Eds.), Family assessment and early intervention (pp. 185--206). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
