Early childhood intervention specialists need information on practices and procedures that are both helpful and positively perceived by both families and practitioners. This study used nine consumer focus groups to determine preferences for practices. The researchers share principles for early intervention services, preferences for identification of family strengths and needs, and the outcomes that are most desired from program services. These findings suggest a need to rethink how we deliver services and interact with family members.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, D.B., (1988). Rationale and model for family assessment in early intervention. In D.B. Bailey & R.J. Simeonsson (Eds.), Family assessment in early intervention (pp. 1--26). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
2.
Benson, H., & Turnbull, A.P., (1986). Approaching families from an individualized perspective. In R.H. Horner, L.M. Voeltz, & H.D. Fredericks (Eds.), Education for learners with severe handicaps: Exemplary service strategies (pp. 127--157). Baltimore: Brookes.
3.
Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research, 54,(1), 10--32.
4.
Coles, R. (1989). The call of stories.Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
5.
Deal, A.G., Dunst, C.J. & Trivette, C.M., (1989). A flexible and functional approach to developing Individualized Family Support Plans. Infants and Young Children, 1,(4), 32--43.
6.
Dunst, C.J., Trivette, C.M. & Deal, A.G., (1988). Enabling and empowering families: Principles and guidelines for practice.Cambridge, MA: Brookline Books.
7.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L., (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research.New York: Aldine.
8.
Guba, E.G., (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journa, 29,(2), 75--91.
Johnson, B.H, McGonigel, M.J & Kaufmann, R.K (Eds.). (1989). Guidelines and recommended practices for the Individualized Family Service Plan (Issue No. 1). Chapel Hill, NC: National Early Childhood Technical Assistance System.
11.
Krauss, M.W., (1988). Family assessment: Purposes and techniques. In S.J. Meisels & J.P. Shonkoff (Eds.), Handbook of early childhood intervention: Theory, practice, and analysis.New York: Cambridge University Press.
12.
Krueger, R.A., (1988). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13.
LaRossa, R., & Wolf, J.H., (1985). On qualitative family research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 531--541.
14.
Meisels, S.J., (1988). Guidelines for the identification and assessment of young disabled and developmentally vulnerable children and their families. Unpublished manuscript, National Center for Clinical Infant Programs.
15.
Morgan, D.L., (1988). Focus groups as qualitative research.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
16.
Salisbury, C.L., (1989). Construct validity of the adapted Questionnaire on Resources and Stress-Short Form. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 94, 74--79.
17.
Shelton, T.L., Jeppson, E.S. & Johnson, B.H., (1987). Family-centered care for children with special health care needs.Washington, DC: Association for the Care of Children's Health.
18.
Stainback, S., & Stainback, W. (1984). Methodological considerations in qualitative research. The Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 9, 296--303.
19.
Walker, D.K., & Crocker, R.W., (1988). Measuring family systems outcomes. In H.B. Weiss & F.H. Jacobs (Eds.), Evaluating family programs (pp. 153--176). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
