As states and individual programs strive to meet the mandates of P.L. 99--457, the experiences of those who have already been involved in the family assessment process are likely to be useful. This article draws on the experience of a model demonstration project, Delaware FIRST, which utilized family assessment for overall project evaluation and program planning for parents and professionals. The instrument selection process, description of tools selected, administration procedure, families' reactions to the process, and usefulness of these assessments in overall project evaluation are summarized. The article concludes with recommendations based on Delaware FIRST's transition from a model demonstration project to a service delivery system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abidin, L. (1983). Parenting stress index.Charlottesville, VA: Pediatric Psychology Press.
2.
Bailey, D.B., (1987). Collaborative goal-setting with families: Resolving differences in values and priorities for services. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 7,(2), 59--71.
3.
Bailey, D.B., (1988a). Assessing family stress and needs. In D.B. Bailey & R.J. Simeonsson (Eds.), Family assessment in early intervention (pp. 95--118). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
4.
Bailey, D.B., (1988b). Rationale and model for family assessment in early intervention. In D.B. Bailey & R.J. Simeonsson (Eds.), Family assessment in early intervention (pp. 1--26). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
5.
Bailey, D.B., Simeonsson, R.J.Winton, P.J.Huntington, G.S.Comfort, M.Isbell, P. O'Donnell, K.J. & Helm, J.M., (1986). Family-focused intervention: A functional model for planning, implementing, and evaluating individualized family services in early intervention. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 10,(2), 156--171.
6.
Deal, A.G., Dunst, C.J. & Trivette, C.M., (1989). A flexible and functional approach to developing Individualized Family Support Plans. Infants and Young Children, 1,(4), 32--43.
7.
Deiner, P. (1987). Systems of care for disabled children and family members: New paradigms and alternatives. Marriage and Family Review, 11(1/2), 193--211.
8.
Dunst, C.J., Jenkins, V. & Trivette, C.M., (1984). The Family Support Scale: Reliability and validity. Journal of Individual, Family, and Community Wellness, 1,(4), 45--52.
9.
Duvall, E., & Miller, S. (1985). Marriage and family development.New York: Harper & Row.
10.
Forman, B.D., & Hagan, B.J., (1983). A comparative review of total family functioning measures. The American Journal of Family Therapy, 11, 25--40.
11.
Johnson, B.H., McGonigel, M.J. & Kaufmann, R.K. (Eds.). (1989, March). Guidelines and recommended practices for the individualized family service plan. NEC*TAS and ACCH.
12.
McCubbin, H., & Patterson, J. (1983). The family stress process: The double ABCX model of adjustment and adaptation. In H. McCubbin, M. Sussman, & J. Patterson (Eds.), Social stress and the family: Advances and developments in family stress theory and research: Vol. 6 (pp. 7--37). New York: Haworth.
13.
McGonigel, M.J., & Garland, C.W., (1988). The individualized family service plan and the early intervention team: Team and family issues and recommended practices. Infants and Young Children, 1,(1), 10--21.
14.
Mott, S.E., Fewell, R.R.Lewis, M.Meisels, S.J.Shonkoff, J.P. & Simeonsson, R.J., (1986). Methods for assessing child and family outcomes in early childhood special education programs: Some views from the field. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 6,(2), 1--15.
15.
Olson, D.H., Portner, J. & Lavee, Y. (1985). FACES III.St. Paul: University of Minnesota.
16.
Turnbull, A.P., & Turnbull, H.R., (1986). Families, professionals, and exceptionality: A special partnership.Columbus, OH: Merrill.
17.
Walsh, F. (1982). Conceptualizations of normal family functioning. In F. Walsh (Ed.), Normal family processes (pp. 3--42), New York: Guilford Press.
