This article reports the methodology and results of a two-year program evaluation effort to determine the effectiveness of an early intervention program for handicapped infants and preschool children. The primary outcome variable was child change as measured by two dependent measures. Other outcome variables included documentation of population characteristics, parent satisfaction, and program operation costs. Overall, the results indicate the intervention program had a positive impact on participating children and their parents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bailey, E. (1983.) Psychometric evaluation of the Comprehensive Early Evaluation and Programming System. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon, Eugene.
2.
Bailey, E., & Bricker, D. (1984). The efficacy of early intervention for severely handicapped infants and young children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 4(3), 30–51
3.
Bricker, D., Bailey, E., & McDonnell, A. (1984). Early intervention program. Final report submitted to Handicapped Children's Early Education Program, Special Education Programs, U. S. Office of Education. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon.
4.
Bricker, D., Bruder, M., & Bailey, E. (1982). Developmental integration of preschool children. Analysis and Intervention in Developmental Disabilities, 2, 207–222.
5.
Bricker, D., & Gentry, D. (1982). The Comprehensive Early Evaluation and Programming System. Moscow, ID: University of Idaho. Unpublished manuscript.
6.
Bricker, D., & Sheehan, R. (1981). Effectiveness of an early intervention program as indexed by child change. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 4, 11–27.
7.
Guralnick, M., & Bricker, D. (in press). The effectiveness of early intervention for children with cognitive and general developmental delays. In M. Guralnick & F. Bennett (Eds.), The effectiveness of early intervention. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Knobloch, H., Stevens, F., & Malone, A. (1980). Manual of developmental diagnosis: The administration and interpretation of the revised Gesell and Armatruda developmental and neurologic examination. Hagerstown, MD: Harper & Row.
