Berryman, S., & Glennan, T.An improved strategy for evaluating federal programs in education. In J. Pincus (Ed.), Educational evaluation in the public policy setting (Report No. R-2502-RC). Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1980.
2.
Bricker, D., Sheehan, R., & Littman, D.Early intervention: A plan for evaluating program impact (Series Paper 10). Monmouth, Ore.: Western States Technical Assistance Resource, 1981.
3.
Campbell, D., & Stanley, J.Experimental and quasiexperimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1966.
4.
Cook, T., & Campbell, D.Quasi-experimentation design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979.
5.
Glass, G., Wilson, V., & Gottman, J.Design and analysis of time-series experiments. Boulder: University of Colorado Press, 1975.
6.
Hamilton, J., & Swan, W.Measurement references in the assessment of preschool handicapped children. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1981, 1(2), 41–48.
7.
Huck, S., Cormier, W., & Bounds, W.Reading statistics and research. New York: Harper & Row, 1974.
8.
Keogh, B.K., & Sheehan, R.The use of developmental test data for documenting handicapped children's progress: Problems and recommendations.Journal of Division of Early Childhood, 1981, 3, 42–47.
9.
Levine, M.Scientific method and the adversary model: Some preliminary suggestions. UCLA Evaluation Comment, 1973, 4(2), 1–3.
10.
Linn, R.Validity of inferences based on the proposed Title I evaluation models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979, 1(2), 23–32.
11.
McCarthy, D.Manual for the McCarthy Scales of Children's Abilities. New York: Psychological Corporation, 1972.
12.
National Advisory Council on the Education of Disadvantaged Children. Special Report on Mandated Studies. (Publication No. 626–738/1664). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1979.
13.
Pefley, D., & Smith, H.It's Monday morning. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Technical Assistance Development Systems (TADS), 1976.
Schwartzmueller, E.Nonparametric statistics for behavior modification data. Unpublished master's thesis, Georgia State University, 1974.
16.
Scriven, M.Evaluation perspectives and procedures. In W.J. Popham (Ed.), Evaluation in education. Berkeley, Calif.: McCutchan, 1974.
17.
Sheehan, R.Issues in documenting early intervention with infants and parents. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 1(3), 1981, 67–75.
18.
Sheehan, R., & Keogh, B.K.Strategies for documenting progress of handicapped children in early education programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, in press.
19.
Suarez, T., & Vandiviere, P. (Eds.). Planning for evaluation—A resource book for programs for preschool handicapped children. Chapel Hill, N.C.: Technical Assistance Development Systems (TADS), 1978.
20.
White, O.Adaptive performance objectives: Form vs. function. In W. Sailor, B. Wilcox, & L. Brown (Eds.), Instructional design for the severely handicapped. Baltimore, Md.: Brookes, 1980.
21.
Wiles, D.The logic of Y = f(X) in the study of educational politics. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1981, 3(2), 67–73.
22.
Zigler, E.America's Head Start program: An agenda for its second decade. Young Children, 1978, 33(5), 4–11.