Alkin, M.C.Evaluation theory development. Evaluation Comment, 1969, 2(1), 2–7.
2.
Applied Management Sciences. Final Technical Report for the Follow Through Task Order. Silver Spring, Md.: Applied Management Sciences, December 1980.
3.
Berman, A., & McLaughlin, M.W.Implementation of educational innovations.Educational Forum, 1976, 3, 345–370.
4.
Berman, P., McLaughlin, M., Boss, J., Pauly, E., & Zellman, G.Factors affecting implementation and continuation. In, Federal programs supporting educational change (Vol. 8). Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1977.
5.
Capie, W., Tobin, K., Ellett, C.D., & Johnson, C.E. The dependability of job performance rating scales for making classification decisons. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Los Angeles, April 1981.
6.
Churchman, D.A new approach to evaluating the implementation of innovative educational programs. Educational Technology, 1979, 19(5), 25–28.
7.
Cooley, W.Methods of evaluating school innovations. Invited address at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., September 1971.
8.
Ellett, C.D.Issues related to the evaluation of program implementation. In M.C. Wang & L. Rudner (Eds.), Documentation of School Improvement Efforts: Some Technical Issues and Future Research Agenda. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Learning Research and Development Center and U.S. Department of Education. National Institute of Education, in preparation.
9.
Ellett, C.D., Hawn, H.C., Pool, K., & Des Jardines, L.The Mathemagenic Activities Program Implementation Assessment Instrument. Athens: University of Georgia, College of Education, 1980.
10.
Evans, W., & Behrman, E.Strategy for evaluating curriculum implementation. Curriculum Studies, 1977, 9(1), 75–80.
11.
Evans, W., & Sheffler, J.W.Assessing the implementation of an innovative instructional system. Planning & Changing, 1976, 7(1), 21–30.
12.
Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development. Educational programs that work: A resource of exemplary educational programs developed by local school districts and approved by the Joint Dissemination Review Panel in the Education Division of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare. San Francisco, Calif.: 1980.
13.
Fullan, M. What have we learned from working with schools and programs that should be considered in future program evaluation? Paper presented at the Austin - National Institute of Education Conference, Austin, Texas, February 1981.
14.
Fullan, M., & Pomfret, A.Research on curriculum and instruction implementation.Review of Educational Research, 1977, 47, 335–397.
15.
Gross, N., Giacquinta, J., & Bernstein, M.Implementing organizational innovations: A sociological analysis of planned educational change. New York: Basic Books, 1971.
16.
Hall, G.E., & Loucks, S.F.A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented.American Educational Research Journal, 1977, 14, 263–176.
17.
Hall, G.E., Loucks, S.F., Rutherford, W.L., & Newlove, B.W.Levels of use of the innovation: A framework for analyzing innovation adoption. Journal of Teacher Education, 1975, 26(1), 52–56.
18.
Haney, W.Thinking about test development. In M.C. Wang & L. Rudner (Eds.), Documentation of School Improvement Efforts: Some Technical Issues and Future Research Agenda. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Learning Research and Development Center and U.S. Department of Education, National Institute of Education, in preparation.
19.
House, E.R.Scientific and humanistic evaluations of Follow Through. In M.C. Wang & L. Rudner (Eds.), Documentation of School Improvement Efforts: Some Technicol Issues and Future Research Agenda. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Learning Research and Development Center and U.S. Department of Education, National Institute of Education, in preparation.
20.
Lebby, A.State and Federal validation and dissemination systems. Teacher Education and Special Education, 1981, 4(2), 33–38.
Loucks, S., Newlove, B., & Hall, G.Measuring levels of use of the innovation: A manual for trainers, interviewers, and raters. Austin: University of Texas, Research and Development Center for Teacher Education, 1975.
23.
McDaniels, G.L.A federal administrator's perspective on the documentation of school improvement efforts. Documentation of School Improvement Efforts: Some Technical issues and Future Research Agenda. Pittsburgh, Pa.: Learning Research and Development Center and U.S. Department of Education, National Institute of Education, in preparation.
24.
McGraw, B., Wardrop, J.L., & Bunda, M.Classroom observation schemes: Where are the errors?American Educational Research Journal, 1972, 9, 13–27.
25.
Newfield, J.Measuring the degree of program implementation. Unpublished manuscript, Department of Curriculum and Supervision, University of Georgia, Athens, 1979.
26.
Pincus, J. (Ed.). Educational evaluation in public policy settings. Santa Monica, Calif.: Rand Corporation, 1980.
27.
Revicki, D., & Rubin, R. Models for measuring program implementation: A review and critique. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston, April 1980.
Stake, R.Toward a technology for the evaluation of educational programs. In R.W. Tyler, R.M. Gague, & M. Shriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation: AERA monograph series on curriculum evaluation. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1967.
30.
Stallings, J.Implementation and child effects of teaching practices in Follow Through classrooms. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 1975, 40(7–8, Serial No. 163).
31.
Stufflebeam, D.L. Evaluation as enlightenment for decision making. Address at the Working Conference on Assessment Theory, Sarasota, Fla., January 1968.
32.
Tallmadge, G.K.The Joint Dissemination Review Panel: IDEABOOK. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Office of Education and the National Institute of Education, 1977.
33.
Tukey, T.W.Conclusions vs. decisions.Technometrics, 1960, 2, 423–433.
34.
Wang, M.C.The Individualized Early Learning Program 1979–80 sponsor's end-of-year report (Vol. 1, Tech. Rep. submitted to the National Follow Through Program Office). Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, 1980. (a)
35.
Wang, M.C.Some design considerations in the documentation of program implementation and effects: A working paper. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh, Learning Research and Development Center, 1980. (b)
36.
Wang, M.C. Perspectives on investigating program implementation and educational change: Technical and research support needs. Paper presented at the National Invitational Conference on Documentation of School Improvement Efforts: Some technical issues and future research agenda. Pittsburgh, Pa.: National Institute of Education and the Learning Research and Development Center, March 1981.
37.
Wang, M.C., & Ellett, C.D.A data-based approach to providing a description of and evaluation framework for the National Follow Through Program. Research proposal submitted to U.S. Department of Education, August 1980.
38.
Wang, M.C., & Gow, D.T. A model for the design, study, selection, and implementation of adaptive school learning environments: R&D based and clinically tailored. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New York, April 1977.
39.
Wang, M.C., & Rudner, L. (Eds.). Documentation of school improvement efforts: Some technical issues and future research agenda. Conference proceedings. Book in preparation, 1981.
40.
Wholey, J.Evaluation: Promise and performance. Washington, D.C.: Urban Institute, 1979.