Bricker, D., & Sheehan, R. Effectiveness of an early intervention program as indexed by measures of child change. Paper presented at Handicapped Children's Early Education Program Director's Meeting, Washington, D.C., December 1980.
3.
Bricker, D., Sheehan, R., & Littman, D.Early intervention: A plan for evaluating program impact. Seattle, Wash.: WESTAR Publications, 1981.
4.
Casuso, V.Working with families of the preschool handicapped child in Spanish-speaking communities. In P. Trohanis (Ed.), Early education in Spanish-speaking communities. New York: Walker, 1978.
5.
Cook, T., & Campbell, D.Quasi-experimentation design and analysis issues for field settings. Chicago: Rand McNally, 1979.
6.
Cross, L., & Johnston, S.A bibliography of instruments. In L. Cross & K. Goin (Eds.), Identifying handicapped children: A guide to casefinding, screening, diagnosis, assessment, and evaluation. New York: Walker, 1977.
7.
Filler, J.Sensorimotor assessment performance as a function of task materials. In D. Bricker & W. Bricker (Eds.), Infant, toddler, and preschool research and intervention project report: Year 3. IMRID Behavioral Science Monograph No. 23. Nashville, Tenn.: Institute on Mental Retardation and Intellectual Development, George Peabody College, 1973.
8.
Gratch, G.Piaget, the notion of action, and assessing intelligence in handicapped infants. In D. Bricker (Ed.), Intervention with at-risk and handicapped infants: From research to application. Baltimore, Md.: University Park Press, in press.
9.
Johnson, N.Assessment paradigms and atypical infants: An interventionist's perspective. In D. Bricker (Ed.), Intervention with at-risk and handicapped infants: From research to application. Baltimore, Md.: University Park Press, in press.
10.
Linn, R.Validity of inferences based on the proposed Title I evaluation models. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 1979, 1(2), 23–32.
11.
Robinson, C.Questions regarding the effects of neuromotor problems on sensorimotor development. In D. Bricker (Ed.), Intervention with at-risk and handicapped infants: From research to application. Baltimore, Md.: University Park Press, in press.
12.
Swanson, J.Principles of infant assessment. In B. Darby & M. May (Eds.), Infant assessment: Issues and applications. Seattle, Wash.: WESTAR Publications, 1979.
13.
Walls, R., Werner, T., Bacon, A., & Zane, T.Behavior checklists. In J. Cone & R. Hawkins (Eds.), Behavioral assessment: New directions in clinical psychology. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1977.
14.
White, O.Adaptive performance objectives: Form versus function. In W. Sailor, B. Wilcox, & L. Brown (Eds.), Methods of instruction for severely handicapped students. Baltimore, Md.: Paul Brookes, 1980.
15.
White, O., Edgar, E., & Haring, N.Uniform performance assessment system. College of Education, Experimental Education Unit, Child Development and Mental Retardation Center, University of Washington, Seattle, 1978.
16.
White, O., & Haring, N.Evaluating educational programs serving the severely and profoundly handicapped. In N. Haring & D. Bricker (Eds.), Teaching the severely handicapped (Vol. 3). Columbus, Ohio: Special Press, 1978.
