Sensing technologies that provide continuous, real-time information about teachers’ and students’ individual experiences are increasingly being applied to classroom-based research. Sensing technologies provide a possible alternative to costly and time-intensive in-person or hand-coded observations and have the potential to increase our present understanding of the vastly different experiences students within the same classroom often have. The goal of the present article is to provide an overview of sensing technologies, an explanation of how these technologies can be applied in early childhood classroom-based research, and examples of existing studies that have successfully implemented sensing technologies in the classroom environment.
AhujaK.KimD.XhakajF.VargaV.XieA.ZhangS.TownsendJ. E.HarrisonC.OganA.AgarwalY. (2019). EduSense: Practical classroom sensing at scale. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous, 3(3), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3351229
2.
AltmanR. L.LaursenB.PerryL. K.MessingerD. S. (2020). Validation of continuous measures of peer social interaction with self- and teacher-reports of friendship and social engagement. The European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17(5), 773–785. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2020.1716724
BakemanR.QueraV. (2011). Sequential analysis and observational methods for the behavioral sciences. Cambridge University Press.
5.
BredinH.YinR.CoriaJ. M.GellyG.KorshunovP.LavechinM.FustesD.TiteuxH.BouazizW.GillM.-P. (2020, May4–8). Pyannote.Audio: Neural building blocks for speaker diarization [Conference session]. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP 2020, Barcelona, Spain.
6.
BuolamwiniJ.GebruT. (2018). Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 81, 1–15.
7.
BurchinalM.GarberK.FosterT.Bratsch-HinesM.FrancoX.Peisner-FeinbergE. (2021). Relating early care and education quality to preschool outcomes: The same or different models for different outcomes?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 55, 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2020.10.005
8.
CartaJ. J.GreenwoodC. R. (1985). Eco-behavioral assessment: A methodology for expanding the evaluation of early intervention programs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 5(2), 88–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112148500500209
9.
Chaparro-MorenoL. J.JusticeL. M.LoganJ. A. R.PurtellK. M.LinT.-J. (2019). The preschool classroom linguistic environment: Children’s first-person experiences. PLoS ONE, 14(8), e0220227. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220227
10.
CohnJ. F.EkmanP. (2005). Measuring facial action. In HarriganJ. A.RosenthalR.SchererK. R. (Eds.), The new handbook of nonverbal behavior research methods in the affective sciences (pp. 9–64). Oxford University Press.
11.
ConnorC. M.AdamsA.ZargarE.WoodT. S.HernandezB. E.VandellD. L. (2020). Observing individual children in early childhood classrooms using Optimizing Learning Opportunities for Students (OLOS): A feasibility study. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 52, 74–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2019.10.001
12.
CoteG. L.LecR. M.PishkoM. V. (2003). Emerging biomedical sensing technologies and their applications. IEEE Sensors Journal, 3(3), 251–266. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2003.814656.
13.
CristiaA.BulgarelliF.BergelsonE. (2020). Accuracy of the Language Environment Analysis System segmentation and metrics: A systematic review. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(4), 1093–1105. https://doi.org/10.1044/2020_JSLHR-19-00017
14.
CustodeS. A.BaileyJ.SunL.KatzL.UlleryM.MessingerD.Bulotsky-ShearerR. J.PerryL. K. (2023). Preschool language environments and social interactions in an early intervention classroom: A pilot study. Journal of Early Intervention. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10538151231176176
15.
DignathC.BüttnerG. (2018). Teachers’ direct and indirect promotion of self-regulated learning in primary and secondary school mathematics classes – insights from video-based classroom observations and teacher interviews. Metacognition Learning, 13, 127–157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-018-9181-x
16.
DungenJ.AntonescuT.GenestP. O. (2013, October21–24). Towards a simple, versatile, distributed low-power wireless M2M infrastructure [Conference session]. 38th Annual IEEE Conference, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
17.
FasanoR. M.PerryL. K.ZhangY.VitaleL.WangJ.SongC.MessingerD. S. (2021). A granular perspective on inclusion: Objectively measured interactions of preschoolers with and without autism. Autism Research, 14(8), 1658–1669. https://doi.org/10.1002/aur.2526.
FosterT. J.PelfreyG. L. (2023, March 22). Understanding children’s classroom experiences using objective data [Conference presentation]. SRCD 2023 Pre-Conference: Technology, Data and Development in Preschool, Salt Lake City, UT.
20.
FosterT. J.XiaoN.PelfreyG. L.Gonzalez VillasantiH.BrockM.JusticeL. (2023). Peer-mediated intervention for socially-isolated preschoolers: An early-stage feasibility study. Manuscript under review.
21.
Gonzalez VillasantiH.JusticeL. M.Chaparro-MorenoL. J.LinT-J.PurtellK. M. (2020). Automatized analysis of children’s exposure to child-directed speech in preschool settings: Validation and application. PLoS One, 15(11), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371Bu/journal.pone.0242511
22.
HamreB. K.PiantaR. C.Chomat-MooneyL. (2009). Conducting classroom observations in school-based research. In DinellaL. M. (Ed.), Conducting science-based psychology research in schools (pp. 79–105). American Psychological Association.
23.
HansenJ. H.NajafianM.LileikyteR.IrvinD. W.RousB. (2019). Speech and language processing for assessing child–adult interaction based on diarization and location. International Journal of Speech Technology, 22(3), 697–709. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10772-019-09590-0
24.
HansenJ. H. L.HickmanK.JonesN.DubeyH.SangwanA.KothapallyV. (2017, June 1–3). UTDallas-PLTL: Leveraging spoken language technology for assessment of communication based learning behavior in peer-led team learning [Conference session]. Sixth Annual Conference Peer-Led Team Learning International Society, Chicago, IL, United States.
25.
HansenJ. H. L.PatilS. (2007). Speech under stress: Analysis, modeling and recognition. In C.Müller (Ed.), Speaker classification I: Fundamentals, features, and methods (pp. 108–137). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74200-5_6
26.
HoogeI. T. C.NiehorsterD. C.HesselsR. S.BenjaminsJ. S.NystromM. (2022). How robust are wearable eye trackers to slow and fast head and body movements. Behavior Research Methods, 55, 4128–4142. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-022-02010-3
27.
HunterS. B. (2020). The unintended effects of policy-assigned teacher observations: Examining the validity of observation scores. AERA Open, 6(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420929276
28.
IrvinD. W.CrutchfieldS. A.GreenwoodC. R.KearnsW. D.BuzhardtJ. (2018). An automated approach to measuring child movement and location in the early childhood classroom. Behavior Research Methods, 50(3), 890–901. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428
29.
IrvinD. W.CrutchfieldS. A.GreenwoodC. R.SimpsonR. L.SangwanA.HansenJ. H. L. (2017). Exploring classroom behavioral imaging: Moving closer to effective and data-based early childhood inclusion planning. Advances in Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 1(2), 95–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41252-017-0014-8
30.
IrvinD. W.LuoY.HuffmanJ. M.Grasley-BoyN.RousB.HansenJ. H. L. (2021). Capturing talk and proximity in the classroom: Advances in measuring features of young children’s friendships. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 57, 102–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2021.05.003
31.
IrvinD. W.RousB.LuoY.LaneJ.WallischA.RojasJ.IrvinA. E.BergstromH.Grassley-BoyN. (2023). Advances in measuring talk on the early childhood playground. Manuscript in preparation.
32.
KasparianA. M.BadawyS. M. (2022). Utility of Fitbit devices among children and adolescents with chronic health conditions: A scoping review. mHealth, 8, 1–17.
33.
KearnsW. D.ScottS.FozardJ. L.Dillahunt-AspillagaC.JasiewiczJ. M. (2016). Decreased movement path tortuosity is associated with improved functional status in patients with traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 31(1), E13–E19. https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000000125
34.
KinnunenT.SidoroffI.TuononenM.FräntiP. (2011). Comparison of clustering methods: A case study of text-independent speaker modeling. Pattern Recognition Letters, 32(13), 1604–1617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2011.06.023
35.
KurzA.ReichenbergR. E.ElliottS. N.YelN. (2020). Opportunity-to-learn performance levels and student achievement gains for students with and without disabilities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103092
36.
LamereP.KwokP.GouveaE.RajB.SinghR.WalkerW.WarmuthM.WolfP. (2003, April6–10). The CMU SPHINX-4 speech recognition system [Conference session]. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (Vol. 1, pp. 2–5).
37.
LeeW. S.AlchanatisV.YangC.HirafujiM.MoshouD.LiC. (2010). Sensing technologies for precision specialty crop production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 74(1), 2–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2010.08.005
38.
LileikyteR.IrvinD.HansenJ. H. L. (2022). Assessing child communication engagement and statistical speech patterns via speech recognition in naturalistic active learning spaces. Speech Communication, 140, 98–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2022.01.0
39.
LuoY.IrvinD.BussN.GuiterrezA.RousB. (2020, December10–13). Outdoor playground localization system for tracking young children using Ubisense Sensor Network [Conference session]. 2020 IEEE 17th International Conference on Mobile Ad Hoc and Sensor Systems (MASS), Delhi, India.
40.
MashburnA. J.PiantaR. C.HamreB. K.DownerJ. T.BarbarinO. A.BryantD.BurchinalM.EarlyD. M.HowesC. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic language and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01154.x
41.
MessingerD. S.PrinceE. B.ZhengM.MartinK.MitsvenS. G.HuangS.StӧlzelT.JohnsonN.RudolphU.PerryL. K.LaursenB.SongC. (2019). Continuous measurement of dynamic classroom social interactions. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 43(3), 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025418820708
42.
MitsvenS. G.PerryL. K.TaoY.ElbaumB. E.JohnsonN.MessingerD. S. (2021). Objectively measured teacher and preschooler vocalizations: Phonemic diversity is associated with language abilities. Developmental Science, 25(2), e13177. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.13177.
43.
NICHD Early Child Care Research Network. (2002). Early child care and children’s development prior school entry: Results from the NICHD Study of Early Child Care. American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 133–164. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312039001133
OwnC.-M.CaiT.Hung.C.-Y. (2023). Exploring the potential of tangible and multitouch interfaces to promote learning among preschool children. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(1), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1109/TLT.2022.3170031
46.
PelattiC. Y.DyniaJ. M.LoganJ. A.JusticeL. M.KaderavekJ. (2016). Examining quality in two preschool settings: Publicly funded early childhood education and inclusive early childhood education classrooms. Child & Youth Care Forum, 45(6), 829–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10566-016-9359-9
47.
PerryL. K.MitsvenS. G.CustodeS.VitaleL.LaursenB.SongC.MessingerD. S. (2022). Reciprocal patterns of peer speech in preschoolers with and without hearing loss. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 60, 201–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.02.003
48.
PerryL. K.PrinceE. B.ValtierraA. M.Rivero-FernandezC.UlleryM. A.KatzL. F.LaursenB.MessingerD. S. (2018). A year in words: The dynamics and consequences of language experiences in an intervention classroom. PLoS One, 13(7), e0199893. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199893
49.
PiantaR. C.HamreB. K. (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09332374
50.
PiantaR. C.HamreB.StuhlmanM. (2003). Relationships between teachers and children. In ReynoldsW. M.MillerG. E. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Educational psychology (Vol. 7, pp. 199–234). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
51.
RäsänenO.SeshadriS.KaradayiJ.RieblingE.BunceJ.CristiaA.MetzeF.CasillasM.RosembergC.BergelsonE.SoderstromM. (2019). Automatic word count estimation from daylong child-centered recordings in various language environments using language-independent syllabification of speech. Speech Communication, 113, 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.specom.2019.08.005
52.
RobsonS. (2011). Producing and using video data in the early years: Ethical questions and practical consequences in research with young children. Children & Society, 25(3), 179–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00267.x
53.
SawyerB. E.O’ConnellA.BhakthaN.JusticeL. M.SantoroJ. R.Rhoad DrogalisA. (2022). Does teachers’ self-efficacy vary for different children? A study of early childhood special educators. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 42(1), 50–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121420906528
54.
SchweigJ. D.KaufmanJ. H.OpferV. D. (2020). Day by day: Investigating variation in elementary mathematics instruction that supports the common core. Educational Researcher, 49(3), 176–187.
55.
SevenY.IrvinD. W.KothalkarP.DuttaS.BuzhardtJ.RousB.HansenJ. H. L. (2024). Capturing the quantity and location of adult wh-words in the preschool classroom using a sensing tool system. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 66, 168–177.
56.
ShokouhiN.ZiaeiA.SangwanA.HansenJ. H. L. (2015, April19–24). Robust overlapped speech detection and its application in word-count estimation for prof-life-log data [Conference session]. 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia (pp. 4724–4728). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178867
57.
StecherB. M.HoltzmanD. J.GaretM. S.HamiltonL. S.EngbergJ.SteinerE. D.RobynA.BairdM. D.GutierrezI. A.PeetE. D.BrodziakI.FronbergK.WeinbergerG.HunterG. P.ChambersJ. (2018). Improving teaching effectiveness: The Intensive Partnerships for effective teaching through 2015-2016. RAND.
58.
TaylorE. S.TylerJ. H. (2012). Can teacher evaluation improve teaching? Evidence of systematic growth in the effectiveness of midcareer teachers. Education Next, 12(4), 78.
WangY.-L.KajamiesA.HurmeT.-R.PalonenT. (2021). Together with my playmates: Preschoolers’ peer relationships and interactions in small group settings. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30, 100531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100531
61.
WentzelK.RussellS.BakerS. (2014). Peer relationships and positive adjustment at school. In FurlongM. J.GilmanR.HuebnerE. S. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology in schools (2nd ed., pp. 260–277). Routledge.
ZiaeiA.SangwanA.KaushikL.HansenJ. H. L. (2015, April19–24). Prof-life-log: Analysis and classification of activities in daily audio streams [Conference session]. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, South Brisbane, QLD, Australia (pp. 4719–4723). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2015.7178866
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
