Dosage Reporting in Early Intervention Literature: A Systematic Review

Abstract

This systematic review explores the topic of Part C Early Intervention (EI) dosage reporting and decision-making factors. From an extensive search following PRISMA guidelines, we identified 14 interdisciplinary studies (combination of descriptive, correlational, mixed method, qualitative, and single case design) that met the criteria and synthesized them based on the reported definitions and data of EI dosage components, including frequency, duration, and intensity, as well as factors associated with this data at child, family, and community levels. Results indicate frequency was most reported, whereas duration and intensity were inconsistently reported, as were service delivery models. The inconsistency of reporting did not allow for interpretations of effective dosage; however, disparities based on different factors are shared. Results and discussion are provided for each level of factors, such as family demographics, insurance enrollment, and disability classification. Implications for further research and practice, especially for EI dosage decision-making and reporting, are included.

Keywords

children with disabilities families home visiting intervention strategies

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

*Aaron

Chiarello

L. A.

Palisano

R. J.

Gracely

O’Neil

Kolobe

(2014). Relationships among family participation, team support, and intensity of early intervention services. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 34(4), 343–355. https://doi.org/10.3109/01942638.2014.899286P

Bagnato

J. S. S.

Suen

H. K.

Fevola

A. V.

(2011). “Dosage” effects on developmental progress during early childhood intervention: Accessible metrics for real-life research and advocacy. Infants & Young Children, 24(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e3182104896

Bailey

D. B.

(1990). FOCAS: Family orientation to community and agency services. Carolina Institute for Research on Infant Personnel Preparation.

Bailey

D. B.

(2001). Evaluation of parent involvement and family support in early intervention and preschool programs. Journal of Early Intervention 24, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510102400101

Bailey

D. B.

Jr. Aytch

L. S.

Odom

S. L.

Symons

Wolery

(1999). Early intervention as we know it. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 5, 11–20. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1002/(SICI)1098-2779(1999)5:13.0.CO;2-U

Bailey

D. B.

Simeonsson

R. J.

(1988). Assessing need of families with handicapped infants. The Journal of Special Education, 22, 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1177/002246698802200113

Bricker

D. D

Squires

Mounts

Potter

Nickel

Twombly

Farrell

(1999). Ages and stages questionnaires (ASQ): A parent-completed, child-monitoring system (2nd ed.). Brookes Publishing Company.

Bruder

M. B.

(2000). Family-centered early intervention: Clarifying our values for the new millennium. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 105–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/027112140002000206

*Bruder

M. B.

Dunst

C. J.

(2007). Relationship between service coordinator practices and early intervention services. Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals, 16, 29.

10.

Center for IDEA Early Childhood Data Systems & Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center. (2017). Definitions for child outcomes summary (COS) ratings. http://ectacenter.org/~pdfs/eco/definitions_outcome_ratings.pdf

11.

Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. http://www.dec-sped.org/recommendedpractices

12.

*Dunst

C. J.

Hamby

D. W.

Brookfield

(2007). Modeling the effects of early childhood intervention variables on parent and family well-being. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 2, 268–288.

13.

Early Childhood Outcomes Center. (2010). ECO family outcomes survey revised: Part C. http://ectacenter.org/eco/pages/tools.asp

14.

Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center. (2020). Part C of IDEA. https://ectacenter.org/partc/partc.asp

15.

Greer

, & The Infant & Toddler Coordinators Association. (2020). 2020 Tipping points survey: Demographics and challenges. https://www.ideainfanttoddler.org/pdf/2020-Tipping-Points-Survey.pdf

16.

*Hallam

R. A.

Rous

Grove

LoBianco

(2009). Level and intensity of early intervention services for infants and toddlers with disabilities: The impact of child, family, system, and community-level factors on service provision. Journal of Early Intervention, 31, 179–196. https://doi.org/DOI:10.1177/1053815109331914

17.

*Hantak

(2016). An initial examination of relationships between early intervention services, family outcomes, and andragogical factors [Doctoral dissertation]. Lindenwood University.

18.

Individual with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, Pub. L. No. 108-446, (2004).

19.

Innocenti

M. S.

White

K. R.

(1993). Are more intensive early intervention programs more effective? A review of the literature. Exceptionality: A Research Journal, 4(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex0401_3

20.

*Johnson

L. J.

Brown

L. S.

Chang

L. C.

Nelson

L. D.

Mrazek

L. S.

(2011). The cost of servings infants and toddlers under toddlers under part C. Infants & Young Children, 24, 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0b013e3182014c97

21.

Keilty

(2010). The early intervention guidebook for families and professionals: Partnering for success. Teachers College Press.

22.

Kemp

Turnbull

A. P.

(2014). Coaching with parents in early intervention. Infants & Young Children, 27, 305–324. https://doi.org/10.1097/iyc.0000000000000018

23.

Khetani

M. A.

Graham

J. E.

Davies

P. L.

Law

M. C.

Simeonsson

R. J.

(2015). Psychometric properties of the young children’s participation and environment measure. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96, 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2014.09.031

24.

*Khetani

M. A.

McManus

B. M.

Albrecht

E. C.

Kaelin

V. C.

Dooling-Litfin

J. K.

Scully

E. A

. (2020). Early intervention service intensity and young children’s home participation. BMC Pediatrics, 20(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02182-x

25.

*Khetani

M. A.

Richardson

McManus

B. M.

(2017). Social disparities in early intervention service use and provider-reported outcomes. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 38(7), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000474

26.

Kochanek

T. T.

(2001). Fulfilling the promise of early intervention: Factors related to rates of delivered IFSP services. Journal of Early Intervention, 24, 109–111. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510102400205

27.

*Kuhn

Boise

Bainter

Hankey

(2020). Statewide policies to improve early intervention services: Promising practices and preliminary results. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 28(148), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.28.5112

28.

Kuhn

Marvin

C. A.

(2016). “Dosage” decisions for early intervention services. Young Exceptional Children, 19(4), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250615576807

29.

*McManus

B. M.

Richardson

Schenkman

Murphy

Morrato

E. H.

(2019). Timing and intensity of early intervention service use and outcomes among a safety-net population of children. JAMA Network Open, 2(1), e187529. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.7529

30.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

Altman

D. G.

(2009). Preferred reporting items for Systematic systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med, 6(6), e1000097. https://doi.org/doi:10.1371/journal.pmed1000097

31.

National Technical Assistance Center on Transition. (2202, January 7). Quality Indicator Checklists. Transitionta.org. Retrieved December 23, 2022, from https://transitionta.org/quality-indicator-checklists/

32.

*Pepe

(2011). The treatment effects of frequency of speech therapy in early Intervention: A Program evaluation [Doctoral dissertation]. Yeshiva University.

33.

*Richardson

Z. S.

Khetani

M. A.

Scully

Dooling-Litfin

Murphy

N. J.

McManus

B. M.

(2019). Social and functional characteristics of receipt and service use: Intensity of core early intervention services. Academic Pediatrics, 19(7), 722–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2019.02.004

34.

Russell

D. J.

Rosenbaum

P. L.

Gowland

Hardy

Lane

Plews

McGavin

Cadman

Jarvis

(1993). Gross motor function measure manual (2nd ed.). School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Queens University.

35.

*Salisbury

Woods

Snyder

Moddelmog

Mawdsley

Romano

Windsor

(2018). Caregiver and provider experiences with coaching and embedded intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 38(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121417708036

36.

*Schreiber

(2004). Increased intensity of physical therapy for a child with gross motor developmental delay: A case report. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Pediatrics, 24(4), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1300/J006v24n04_05

37.

Shelden

M. L. L.

Rush

D. D.

(2013). The early intervention teaming handbook: The primary service provider approach. Brookes Publishing Company.

38.

Talbott

Maggin

D. M.

Van Acker

E. Y.

Kumm

(2018). Quality indicators for reviews of research in special education. Exceptionality, 26(4), 245–265. https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2017.1283625

39.

VORT Corporation. (2015). Learning HELP 0-3. http://www.vort.com/Learning—HELP-0-3.html

40.

Warfield

M. E.

(1995). The cost-effectiveness of home visiting versus group services in early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 19, 130–148. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519501900207

41.

Witt

J. C.

Elliott

S. N.

(1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In Kratochwill

(Ed.), Advances in school psychology: Volume 4 (pp. 251–288). Lawrence Erlbaum.

42.

Workgroup on Principles and Practices in Natural Environments. (2008). Agreed upon mission and key principles for providing early intervention services in natural environments. https://ectacenter.org/~pdfs/topics/families/Finalmissionandprinciples3_11_08.pdf

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.07 MB