The Family Outcomes Survey–Revised (FOS-R) measures family outcomes of services for young children with disabilities or developmental delays, and it can be used to investigate change in outcome achievement over time. To confirm the validity of FOS-R change scores, it must be established that the FOS-R measures the same construct over time; if so, score changes can be attributed to family outcome achievement. However, if not, interpretation of change scores may be misleading. Caregivers (N = 349) of Singaporean children with developmental delays receiving early intervention services completed the FOS-R Part A twice, approximately 1 year apart. Factor analysis was used to confirm the structure of the FOS-R Part A and to assess whether the scale measures the same thing across time (i.e., longitudinal measurement invariance). Results provided support for partial longitudinal measurement invariance, indicating that change scores on this scale can be validly interpreted with certain caveats.
BaileyD. B.BruderM. B.HebbelerK.CartaJ.DefossetM.GreenwoodC.KahnL.MallikS.MarkowitzJ.SpikerD.WalkerD.BartonL. (2006). Recommended outcomes for families of young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 28(4), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.1177/105381510602800401
2.
BaileyD. B.RaspaM.FoxL. C. (2012). What is the future of family outcomes and family-centered services?Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31(4), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121411427077
3.
BaileyD. B.RaspaM.OlmstedM. G.NovakS. P.SamA. M.HumphreysB. P.NelsonR.RobinsonN.GuillenC. (2011). Development and psychometric validation of the family outcomes survey-revised. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(1), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111399441
BowenM. (1978). Family therapy in clinical practice. Jason Aronson.
6.
BrownT. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. The Guilford Press.
7.
ByunJ.-H.LeeY.-W. (2016). The latent trait modeling of passage-based reading comprehension test: Testlet-based MIRT approach. English Language Assessment, 11, 25–46.
8.
CheungG. W.RensvoldR. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5
EndersC. (2013). Dealing with missing data in developmental research. Child Development Perspectives, 7(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12008
13.
EpleyP. H.SummersJ. A.TurnbullA. P. (2011). Family outcomes of early intervention: Families’ perceptions of need, services, and outcomes. Journal of Early Intervention, 33(3), 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815111425929
14.
FoodyC.JamesJ. E.LeaderG. (2015). Parenting stress, salivary biomarkers, and ambulatory blood pressure: A comparison between mothers and fathers of children with autism spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(4), 1084–1095. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2263-y
15.
HansonM. J. (2013). Families with children with disabilities. In HansonM. J.LynchE. W. (Eds.), Understanding families: Supportive approaches to diversity, disability, and risk (2nd Ed., pp. 97–122). Baltimore, MD: Paul H Brookes Publishing Co.
16.
HartleyS. L.BarkerE. T.SeltzerM. M.FloydF.GreenbergJ.OrsmondG.BoltD. (2010). The relative risk and timing of divorce in families of children with an autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Family Psychology, 24(4), 449–457. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019847
17.
HastingsR. P. (2007). Longitudinal relationships between sibling behavioral adjustment and behavior problems of children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(8), 1485–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-006-0230-y
18.
HuL. T.BentlerP. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
19.
Hughes-ScholesC. H.Gavidia-PayneS. (2019). Early childhood intervention program quality: Examining family-centered practice, parental self-efficacy and child and family outcomes. Early Childhood Education Journal, 47, 719–729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00961-5
LiC. (2016). Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares. Behavior Research Methods, 48(3), 936–949. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7
22.
LittleT. D.JorgensenT. D.LangK. M.MooreE. W. G. (2014). On the joys of missing data. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 39(2), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpepsy/jst048
23.
MeadeA. W.JohnsonE. C.BraddyP. W. (2008). Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(3), 568–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568
24.
MuthénL. K.MuthénB. O. (1998–2017). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.).
25.
NamkungE. H.SongJ.GreenbergJ. S.MailickM. R.FloydF. J. (2015). The relative risk of divorce in parents of children with developmental disabilities: Impacts of lifelong parenting. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 120(6), 514–526. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-120.6.514
26.
NewmanD. A. (2003). Longitudinal modeling with randomly and systematically missing data: A simulation of ad hoc, maximum likelihood, and multiple imputation techniques. Organizational Research Methods, 6(3), 328–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428103254673
27.
OdomS. L.WoleryM. (2003). A unified theory of practice in early intervention/early childhood special education: Evidence-based practices. The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224669030370030601
28.
OrsmondG. I.KuoH. Y.SeltzerM. M. (2009). Siblings of individuals with an autism spectrum disorder: Sibling relationships and wellbeing in adolescence and adulthood. Autism, 13(1), 59–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362361308097119
PoonK. K.LimA. K. (2012). Current provision, recent developments, and future directions for early childhood intervention in Singapore. Infants and Young Children, 25(4), 323–333. https://doi.org/10.1097/IYC.0b013e31826615f9
31.
PoonK. K.OoiN.BullR.BaileyD. B. (2014). Psychometric validation of the Family Outcome Survey Revised in Singapore. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35(7), 1534–1543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2014.03.047
32.
PoonK. K.YangX. (2016). The student profile, service delivery model, and support practices for early childhood intervention environments in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(3), 437–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/02188791.2014.940030
33.
PostonD.TurnbullA.ParkJ.MannanH.MarquisJ.WangM. (2003). Family quality of life: A qualitative inquiry. Mental Retardation, 41(5), 313–328.
34.
PutnickD. L.BornsteinM. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004
35.
RaspaM.BaileyD. B.OlmstedM. G.NelsonR.RobinsonN.SimpsonM. E.GuillenC.HoutsR. (2010). Measuring family outcomes in early intervention: Findings from a large-scale assessment. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 496–510. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600407
36.
RaspaM.HebbelerK.BaileyD. B. (2009). A guide to analyzing data from the Family Outcomes Survey. Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
37.
R Core Team. (2018). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/
38.
RhemtullaM.Brosseau-LiardP. E.SavaleiV. (2012). Can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal condition. American Psychological Association, 17(3), 354–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315
39.
RijmenF. (2010). Formal relations and an empirical comparison among the bi-factor, the testlet, and a second-order multidimensional IRT model. Journal of Educational Measurement, 47(3), 361–372.
40.
SassD.SchmittT.MarshH. (2014). Evaluating model fit with ordered categorical data within a measurement invariance framework: A comparison of estimators. Structural Equation Modeling, 21(2), 167–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2014.882658
41.
SteinmetzH. (2013). Analyzing observed composite differences across groups: Is partial measurement invariance enough?Methodology, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241/a000049
42.
TurnbullA. P.SummersJ. A.LeeS. H.KyzarK. (2007). Conceptualization and measurement of family outcomes associated with families of individuals with intellectual disabilities. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 13(4), 346–356. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrdd.20174
43.
UedaK.YonemotoN.BaileyD. B. (2015). Psychometric validation of the Family Outcomes Survey-Revised in Japan. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 39, 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2015.01.003
44.
VandenbergR.LanceC. (2000). A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: Suggestions, practices and recommendations for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 3(1), 4–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810031002
WidamanK. F.FerrerE.CongerR. D. (2010). Factorial invariance within longitudinal structural equation models: Measuring the same construct across time. Child Development Perspectives, 4(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-8606.2009.00110.x
47.
WothkeW. (2000). Longitudinal and multigroup modeling with missing data. In LittleT. D.SchnabelK. U.BaumertJ. (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches, and specific examples (pp. 219–240). Lawrence Erlbaum.
