We examined how educating paraprofessionals in preschool classrooms on dialogic reading (DR) affected their storybook reading and effects on children’s single word vocabulary. Through a single-case multiple-probe across participants design including four paraprofessionals and eight preschool children, we identified a functional relation between educating paraprofessionals in DR and implementation of the CROWD prompts; yet, no functional relation was observed for the implementation of the evaluate, expand, and repeat strategies. Data collected on children’s expressive near-transfer vocabulary showed all but one child made minimal gains from baseline to intervention, whereas receptive data remained stable for six participants. Results suggested that paraprofessionals implemented the strategies of DR with variable fidelity following a singular training and in-text supports. Additional supports may be necessary for all aspects of the intervention and generalization to be implemented with fidelity and for improvement to carryover to both receptive and expressive vocabulary skills for children.
BingerC.Kent-WalshJ.EwingC.TaylorS. (2010). Teaching educational assistants to facilitate the multisymbol message productions of young students who require augmentative and alternative communication. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 19, 108–120.
3.
BuysseV.WintonP.RousB.EpsteinD.CavanaughC. (2011). CONNECT Module 6: Dialogic Reading Practices [Web-based professional development curriculum]. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute, CONNECT: The Center to Mobilize Early Childhood Knowledge.
4.
CattsH. W.FeyM. E.WeismerS. E.BridgesM. S. (2014). The relationship between language and reading abilities. In TomblinJ. B.NippoldM. A. (Eds.), Understanding individual differences in language development across the school years (pp. 158–179). New York, NY: Psychology Press.
5.
Causton-TheoharisJ. N.MalmgrenK. W. (2005). Increasing peer interactions for children with severe disabilities via paraprofessional training. Exceptional Children, 71, 431–444.
6.
ChopraR. V.Sandoval-LuceroE.AragonL.BernalC.De BalderasH. B.CarrollD. (2004). The paraprofessional role of connector. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 219–231.
DunnL. M.DunnD. M. (2007). Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, Fourth Edition (PPVT-4). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
9.
FleuryV. P.MiramontezS. H.HudsonR. F.SchwartzI. S. (2013). Promoting active participation in book reading for preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder: A preliminary study. Child Language Teaching & Therapy, 30, 273–288.
10.
FleuryV. P.SchwartzI. S. (2016). A modified dialogic reading intervention for preschool children with autism spectrum disorder. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37, 16–28.
11.
GrayS. (2003). Word-learning by preschoolers with specific language impairment: What predicts success?Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 46, 56–67.
12.
HallL. J.GrundonG. S.PopeC.RomeroA. B. (2010). Training paraprofessionals to use behavioral strategies when educating learners with autism spectrum disorders across environments. Behavioral Interventions, 25, 37–51.
13.
HancockT. B.Ledbetter-ChoK.HowellA.LangR. (2016). Enhanced milieu teaching. In LangR.HancockT.SinghN. (Eds.), Early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorder: Evidence-based practices in behavioral health (pp. 177–218). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
14.
HargraveA. C.SenechalM. (2000). A book reading intervention with preschool children who have limited vocabularies: The benefits of regular reading and dialogic reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 15, 75–90.
15.
HusY. (2014). Educators specializing in language stimulation: Extending speech-language pathology services via paraprofessional training. Speech and Hearing Review: A Bilingual Annual, 12, 103–124.
16.
HutchinsT. L.HowardM.PrelockP. A.BelinG. (2010). Retention of school-based SLPs: Relationships among caseload size, workload satisfaction, job satisfaction, and best practice. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 31, 139–154.
17.
KennedyC. H. (2005). Single-case designs for educational research. Boston, MA: Pearson.
18.
KilloranJ.TemplemanT. P.PetersJ.UdellT. (2001). Identifying paraprofessional competencies for early intervention and early childhood special education. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34, 68–73.
19.
KratochwillT. R.HitchcockJ. H.HornerR. H.LevinJ. R.OdomS. L.RindskopfD. M.ShadishW. R. (2013). Single-case intervention research design standards. Remedial and Special Education, 34, 26–38.
20.
LedfordJ. R.ZimmermanK. N.HarbinE. R.WardS. E. (2018). Improving the use of evidence-based instructional practices for paraprofessionals. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 33, 206–216.
21.
LevinJ. R.WampoldB. E. (1999). Generalized single-case randomization tests: Flexible analyses for a variety of situations. School Psychology Quarterly, 14, 59–93.
22.
LoniganC. J.ShanahanT. (2009). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Executive summary. A scientific synthesis of early literacy development and implications for intervention. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.
23.
LoniganC. J.WhitehurstG. J. (1998). Relative efficacy of parent and teacher involvement in a shared-reading intervention for preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13, 263–290.
McDonnellA. P.HawkenL. S.JohnstonS. S.KidderJ. E.LynesM. J.McDonnellJ. J. (2014). Emergent literacy practices and support for children with disabilities: A national survey. Education & Treatment of Children, 37, 495–529.
26.
MolS. E.BusA. G.de JongM. T. (2009). Interactive book reading in early education: A tool to stimulate print knowledge as well as oral language. Review of Educational Research, 79, 979–1007.
27.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Early Child Care Research Network (Ed.). (2005). Child care and child development: Results from the NICHD study of early child care and youth development. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28.
OdomS. L.WoleryM. (2003). A unified theory of practice in early intervention/early childhood special education: Evidence-based practices. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 164–173.
29.
Pearson Early Learning. (2006). Read together, talk together: Kit A, ages 2-3. San Antonio, TX: Pearson Education.
30.
RoskosK.ErgulC.BryanT.BursteinK.ChristieJ.HanM. (2008). Who’s learning what words and how fast? Preschoolers’ vocabulary growth in an early literacy program. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 22, 275–290.
31.
SchoolingT. L. (2003, August). Lessons from the National Outcomes Measurement System (NOMS). Seminars in Speech and Language, 24, 245–256.
32.
TealeW. H. (2003). Reading aloud to young children as a classroom instructional activity: Insights from research and practice. In van KleeckA.StahlS.A.BauerE.B., (Eds.), On reading books to children: Parents and teachers (pp. 114–139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
33.
TowsonJ. A.FettigA.FleuryV. P.AbarcaD. L. (2017). Dialogic reading in early childhood settings: A summary of the evidence base. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 37, 132–146.
34.
TowsonJ. A.GallagherP. A.BinghamG. E. (2016). Dialogic reading: Language and preliteracy outcomes for young children with disabilities. Journal of Early Intervention, 38, 230–246.
35.
U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, What Works Clearinghouse. (2007). Early childhood education: Dialogic reading. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/interventionreport.aspx?sid=135
36.
WhitehurstG. J.ZevenbergenA. A.CroneD. A.SchultzM. D.VeltingO. N.FischelJ. E. (1999). Outcomes of an emergent literacy intervention from Head Start through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 261–272.
37.
WilcoxM. J.KouriT. A.CaswellS. B. (1991). Early language intervention: A comparison of classroom and individual treatment. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 1, 49–62.
38.
WittJ. C.ElliottS. N. (1985). Acceptability of classroom intervention strategies. In KratochwillT. R. (Ed.), Advances in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 251–288) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
39.
ZevenbergenA. A.WhitehurstG. J.ZevenbergenJ. A. (2003). Effects of a shared-reading intervention on the inclusion of evaluative devices in narratives of children from low-income families. Applied Developmental Psychology, 24, 1–15.
40.
ZimmermanI. L.SteinerV. G.PondE. (2011). Preschool Language Scales-Fifth Edition (PLS-5). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
