Multitreatment designs were used to evaluate the relative effectiveness of multicomponent Stay, Play, Talk (SPT) interventions on peer social behaviors for two groups of children, each including one Participant With Autism Spectrum Disorder (PWA) and two socially competent peers. Children were trained to use buddy strategies during 5-min free-play sessions in an inclusive preschool classroom. Additional components were systematically introduced, including a self-monitored group contingency and recorded reminders. Dependent variables were the percentage of intervals peers spent staying near and playing with the PWA, as well as the number of verbal social interactions between the peers and the PWA. Functional relations were identified for some behaviors for some participants, with the SPT variation including recorded reminders and the group contingency associated with the most positive outcomes. Further research is needed to determine effects of the group contingency and recorded reminders without peer training.
BarberA. B.SaffoR. W.GilpinA. T.CraftL. D.GoldsteinH. (2016). Peers as clinicians: Examining the impact of Stay Play Talk on social communication in young preschoolers with autism. Journal of Communication Disorders, 59, 1–15.
2.
BartonE. E. (2015). Teaching generalized pretend play and related behaviors to young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81, 489–506.
3.
BartonE. E.LloydB. P.SpriggsA. D.GastD. L. (2018). Visual analysis of graphic data. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 179–214). New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
BartonE. E.Meadan-KaplanskyH.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Independent variables, fidelity, and social validity. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 133–156). New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
BartonE. E.PokorskiE. A.SweeneyE. M.VelezM.GossettS.. . . DomingoM. (2018). An empirical examination of effective practices for teaching board game play to young children. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20, 138–148. doi:10.1177/1098300717753833
6.
Division for Early Childhood, & National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2009). Early childhood inclusion: A joint position statement of the Division for Early Childhood (DEC) and the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC). Chapel Hill: Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, The University of North Carolina.
7.
Division for Early Childhood. (2014). DEC Recommended Practices in early intervention/early childhood special education 2014. Washington, DC: Author.
8.
EnglishK.GoldsteinH.ShaferK.KaczmarekL. (1997). Promoting interactions among preschoolers with and without disabilities: Effects of a buddy-skills training program. Exceptional Children, 63, 229–243.
9.
GambleA.StrainP. S. (1979). The effects of dependent and interdependent group contingencies on socially appropriate responses in classes for emotionally handicapped children. Psychology in the Schools, 16, 253–260.
10.
GoldsteinH.EnglishK.ShaferK.KaczmarekL. (1997). Interaction among preschoolers with and without disabilities: Effects of across-the-day peer intervention. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 33–48.
11.
GoldsteinH.KaczmarekL.PenningtonR.ShaferK. (1992). Peer-mediated intervention: Attending to, commenting on, and acknowledging the behavior of preschoolers with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 25, 289–305.
12.
GoldsteinH.SchneiderN.ThiemannK. (2007). Peer-mediated social communication intervention: When clinical expertise informs treatment development and evaluation. Topics in Language Disorders, 27, 182–199.
13.
HughettK.KohlerF. W.RaschkeD. (2013). The effects of a buddy skills package on preschool children’s social interactions and play. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 32, 246–254.
14.
KohlerF. W.GretemanC.RaschkeD.HighnamC. (2007). Using a buddy skills package to increase the social interactions between a preschooler with autism and her peers. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 27, 155–163.
15.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.GastD. L. (2018). Dependent variables, measurement, & reliability. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 97–132). New York, NY: Routledge.
16.
LedfordJ. R.LaneJ. D.SeveriniK. E. (2018). Systematic use of visual analysis for assessing outcomes in single case design studies. Brain Impairment, 19, 4–17.
17.
ShogrenK. A.LangR.MachalicekW.RispoliM. J.O’ReillyM. (2011). Self-versus teacher management of behavior for elementary school students with Asperger syndrome: Impact on classroom behavior. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 13, 87–96.
18.
StrainP. S.BoveyE. H. (2011). Randomized, controlled trial of the LEAP model of early intervention for young children with autism spectrum disorders. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 31, 133–154.
TsaoL.OdomS. (2006). Sibling-mediated social interaction intervention for young children with autism. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26, 106–123.
WoleryM.GastD. L.LedfordJ. R. (2018). Comparative designs. In LedfordJ. R.GastD. L. (Eds.), Single case research methodology: Applications in special education and behavioral sciences (3rd ed., pp. 283–334). New York, NY: Routledge.
23.
WongC.OdomS. L.HumeK. A.CoxA. W.FettigA.KucharczykS.. . . SchultzT. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951–1966.
