Young children with multiple disabilities have unique needs and challenges. Many of these young children struggle to communicate their wants and needs, to freely move their body to access and engage their world, and to learn abstract concepts and ideas. Professionals and families working together must identify the individual supports each child needs to ensure that the young child with multiple disabilities is an active participant in all aspects of his or her life and makes meaningful progress toward valued life outcomes.
BradyN.BashinskiS. (2009). Increasing communication in children with vision and hearing loss. Research & Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 33(1–2), 59–70.
2.
BrownF.CohenS. (1996). Self-determination and young children. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 21(1), 22–30.
3.
BuysseV.WesleyP. W. (2006). Evidence-based practice: How did it emerge and what does it mean for the early childhood field?Zero to Three, 27(2), 50–55.
4.
CalculatorS. (2002). Use of enhanced natural gestures to foster interactions between children with Angelman Syndrome and their parents. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 340–355.
5.
CampbellP. H.MilbourneS.DuganL. M.WilcoxM. J. (2006). A review of the evidence on practices for teaching young children to use assistive technology devices. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 26, 3–13.
6.
CampbellS. K. (2000). The child’s development of functional movement. In CampbellS. K.Vander LindenD. W.PalisanoR. J. (Eds.), Physical therapy for children (2nd ed., pp. 3–44). Philadelphia, PA: W. B. Saunders.
7.
CarterM.IaconoT. (2002). Professional judgments of the intentionality of communicative acts. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 155–169.
8.
ColangeloC. A. (1999). Biomechanical frame of reference. In KramerP.HinojosaJ. (Eds.), Frame of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 257–322). New York, NY: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
9.
CosbeyJ. D.JohnsonS. (2006). Using a single switch voice output communication aid to increase social access for children with severe disabilities in inclusive classrooms. Research and Practice for Persons With Severe Disabilities, 3, 144–156.
10.
CuppsB. (1997). Postural control: A current view. NDTA Network, January/February, 3–7.
11.
DunstC. J.TrivetteC. M.HambyD. W. (2007). A matter of family-centered help giving practices: The ways family support program staff interact with and treat parents contributes to program participants benefits (Winterberry Research Summaries). Asheville, NC: Winterberry Press.
12.
GiangrecoM. (2011). Foundational concepts and practices for educating students with severe disabilities. In SnellM. E.BrownF. (Eds.), Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed., pp. 1–30). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Pearson.
13.
Goodgold-EdwardsS. A. (1993). Principles for guiding action during motor learning: A critical evaluation of neurodevelopmental treatment. Physical Therapy Practice, 2(4), 30–39.
14.
Hadders-AlgraM.PrechtlH. F. (1992). Developmental course of general movements in early infancy: I. Descriptive analysis of change in form. Early Human Development, 28, 201–213.
15.
HornE.ChambersC.SaitoY. (2009). Techniques for teaching young children with moderate/severe or multiple disabilities. In RaverS. (Ed.), Early childhood special education—0 to 8 years: Strategies for positive outcomes (pp. 255–278). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Pearson.
16.
HornE.LieberJ.SandallS.SchwartzI.WorleyR. (2002). Supporting young children’s IEP goals in inclusive settings through embedded learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 208–223.
17.
HornE. M. (1997). Achieving meaningful motor skills: Conceptual and empirical bases of a neurobehavioral intervention approach. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 3, 138–144.
18.
HuntP.SotoG.MaierJ.DoeringK. (2003). Collaborative teaming to support students at risk and students with severe disabilities in general education classroom. Exceptional Children, 69, 315–332.
19.
MarH. H.SallN. (1994). Programmatic approach to use of technology in communication instruction for children with dual sensory impairments. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 10, 138–150.
20.
PinderG. L.OlswangL. (1995). Development of communicative intent in young children with cerebral palsy: A treatment efficacy study. Infant-Toddler Intervention, 5, 51–70.
21.
SandallS.HemmeterM. L.SmithB.McLeanM. E. (2005). DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for practical applications in early/intervention/early childhood special education. Missoula, MT: DEC of CEC.
22.
SaundersM.SaundersR.MulugetaA.HendersonK.KedziorskiT.HekkerB.WilsonS. (2005). A novel method for testing learning and preferences in people with minimal motor movement. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 26, 255–266.
23.
SchlosserR. W.SigafoosJ. (2006). AAC interventions for persons with developmental disabilities: Narrative review of comparative single subject experimental studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 27, 1–29.
24.
SchoenS. A.AndersonJ. (1999). Neurodevelopmental treatment frame of reference. In KramerP.HinojosaJ. (Eds.), Frames of reference for pediatric occupational therapy (2nd ed., pp. 83–118). New York, NY: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
25.
SchweigertP.RowlandC. (1992). Early communication and microtechnology: Instructional sequence and case studies of children with severe multiple disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 8, 273–286.
26.
Shumway-CookA.WollacottM. H. (2001). Motor control: Theory and practical applications. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
27.
SnellM.BrownF. (Eds.). (2011). Instruction of students with severe disabilities (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill-Pearson.
28.
SoodakL. C.ErwinE. J. (2000). Valued member or tolerated participant: Parents’ experiences in inclusive early childhood settings. Journal of the Association for Persons With Severe Handicaps, 25, 29–41.
29.
ThelenE. (1995). Motor development: A new synthesis. American Psychologist, 50, 79–95.
30.
Udvari-SolnerA.Causton-TheoharisJ.York-BarrJ. (2004). Developing adaptations to promote participation in inclusive environments. In OreloveF. P.SobseyD.SilbermanR. K. (Eds.), Educating children with multiple disabilities: A collaborative approach (4th ed., pp. 151–192). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
31.
WehmeyerM. (1996). Self-determination as an educational outcome. In SandsD. J.WehmeyerM. L. (Eds.), Self-determination across the life span: Independence and choice for people with disabilities (pp. 17–36). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
32.
WehmeyerM.PalmerS. (2003). Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three-years after high school: The impact of self-determination. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 38(2), 131–144.
