The authors examined the extent to which parent expectations, perceptions about resource availability and supports, and strategies used to promote participation in home and community activities varied by setting and activity type. Sixteen 90-min semistructured interviews were completed with families receiving Part C early intervention services in three states. Interviews were analyzed in descriptive and interpretive phases using content analysis to identify patterns across cases and logical analysis to cross-classify data and identify patterns by setting and activity type. Parents described how often and how much their children participated but had different ways of describing their expectations depending on the activity setting and/or its purpose. Parent-reported strategies to promote participation provided a direct way of understanding how environments were perceived to impact participation. Implications for tailoring interventions to address the needs of immigrant and nonimmigrant families receiving Part C services are discussed.
BedellG. M. (2004). Developing a follow-up survey focused on participation of children and youth with acquired brain injuries after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation, 19, 191–205.
2.
BedellG. M.CohnE. S.DumasH. M. (2004). Exploring parents’ use of strategies to promote social participation of school-age children with acquired brain injuries. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59, 273–284.
3.
BedellG. M.KhetaniM. A.CousinsM.CosterW. J.LawM. (2011). Parent perspectives to inform development of measures of participation and environment for children and youth with disabilities. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation92, 765–773.
4.
BrickerD. (1996). An activity-based approach to early intervention (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
5.
BrofenbrennerU. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
BuysseV.SkinnerD.GrantS. (2001). Toward a definition of quality inclusion: Perspectives of parents and practitioners. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24, 146–161.
7.
BuysseV.WesleyP. (2006). Evidence-based practice in the early childhood field. Washington, DC: ZERO TO THREE Press.
8.
CappsR.FixM.OstJ.Reardon-AndersonJ.PasselJ. S. (2004). The health and well-being of young children of immigrants. Washington, DC: Urban Institute.
9.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London, England: SAGE.
10.
CosterW. J.DeeneyT.HaltiwangerJ.HaleyS. M. (1998). School Function Assessment. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment/PsychCorp.
11.
CosterW. J.KhetaniM. A. (2008). Measuring participation for children with disabilities: Issues and challenges. Disability and Rehabilitation, 30, 639–648.
12.
DunstC. J. (2001). Participation of young children with disabilities in community learning activities. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change (pp. 307–333). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
13.
DunstC. J.HambyD.TrivetteC. M.RaabM.BruderM. B. (2002). Young children’s participation in everyday family and community activity. Psychological Reports, 91, 875–897.
14.
FarverJ. A.Lee-ShinY. (2000). Acculturation and Korean-American children’s social and play behavior. Social Development, 9, 316–336.
15.
FlorianL.HollenwegerJ.SimeonssonR. J.WedellK.RiddellS.TerziL.HollandA. (2006). Cross-cultural erspectives on the classification of children with disabilities: Part 1. Issues in the classification of children with disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 40, 36–45.
16.
FordD. H.LernerR. M. (1992). Developmental systems theory: An integrative approach. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
17.
GallimoreR.GoldenbergC. N.WeisnerT. S. (1993). The social construction and subjective reality of activity settings: Implications for community psychology. American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 537–559.
18.
Garcia-CollC.MarksA. K. (2009). Immigrant stories: Ethnicity and academics in middle childhood. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
19.
GuralnickM. J. (2005). An overview of the developmental systems model for early intervention. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), The developmental systems approach to early intervention (pp. 3–28). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
20.
KeoghB. K.BernheimerL. P.GallimoreR.WeisnerT. S. (1998). Child and family outcomes over time: A longitudinal perspective on developmental delays. In LewisM.FeiringC. (Eds.), Families, risk, and competence (pp. 269-288). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
21.
KingG. A.LawM.KingS.HurleyH.RosenbaumP.HannaS.. . .YoungN. (2004). CAPE/PAC manual: Children’s Assessment of Participation and Enjoyment and Preferences for Activities of Children. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
22.
KingG. A.ZwaigenbaumL.KingS.BaxterD.RosenbaumP.BatesA. (2006). A qualitative investigation of changes in the belief systems of families of children with autism or Down syndrome. Child: Care, Health, and Development, 32, 353–369.
23.
LawM.HaightM.MilroyB.WillmsD.StewartD.RosenbaumP. (1999). Environmental factors affecting the occupations of children with physical disabilities. Journal of Occupational Science, 6, 102–110.
24.
LawM. (Ed.). (2002). Evidence-based rehabilitation: A guide to practice. Thorofare, NJ: Slack.
25.
LincolnY.GubaE. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
26.
MaulC. A.SingerG. H. S. (2009). “Just good different things”: Specific accommodations families make to positively adapt to their children with developmental disabilities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 29, 155–170.
27.
MihaylovS.JarvisS.ColverA.BeresfordB. (2004). Identification and description of environmental factors that influence participation of children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 46, 299–304.
28.
MishlerE. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, 60, 415–442.
29.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. (2000). From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early child development (Board on Children, Youth, and Families, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
30.
NelsonA. (2002). A meta-synthesis: Mothering other-than-normal children. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 515–530.
31.
OdomA. L.BaileyD. (2001). Inclusive preschool programs: Classroom ecology and child outcomes. In GuralnickM. J. (Ed.), Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change (pp. 203–229). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.
32.
PattonM. Q. (Ed.). (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
33.
RogoffB. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
34.
Tamis-MondaC. S.WayN.HughesD.YoshikawaH.KalmanR. K.NiwaE. Y. (2007). Parents’ goals for children: The dynamic coexistence of individualism and collectivism in cultures and individuals. Social Development, 17, 183–209.
35.
WeisnerT. (2002). Ecocultural understanding of children’s developmental pathways. Human Development, 45, 275–281.
36.
WilsonL. L.MottD. W.BatmanD. (2004). The Asset-Based Context Matrix: A tool for assessing children’s learning opportunities and participation in natural environments. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 24, 110–120.
37.
World Health Organization. (2001). International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
