An exploratory case study was undertaken to investigate the perspectives and experiences of six early intervention providers as they adopted and implemented a collaborative consultation approach to home visiting in urban neighborhoods. Survey, semistructured interview, and focus group methods were used over a 2-year period to obtain data about provider perspectives about the home visiting approach and their experiences in implementing it with parents of infants and toddlers receiving Part C services. The intensity of provider concerns about the use of collaborative consultation and routines-based, family-centered home visiting practices improved at posttest. Providers attributed these changes in large part to the culture of the organization as a learning community and its ongoing administrative support for reflective practice and problem solving about implementation issues. Providers also identified specific factors, such as time and opportunity to practice and problem solving with feedback, as having an impact on their ability to move forward in adopting and using family-centered home visiting practices. Challenges were identified related to home visiting generally, and a consultative approach specifically, in complex urban family settings. Implications for research and practice are discussed.
Anderson, S.E. ( 1997). Understanding teacher change: Revisiting the concerns based adoption model. Curriculum Inquiry, 27, 331-367.
2.
Ansah, A., & Johnson, J.T. ( 2003). Time will tell on issues concerning faculty and distance learning. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration , 6. Retrieved March 9, 2009, from http://www.westga.edu/~distance/ojdla/
3.
Azjen, I. ( 1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Process, 50, 179-211.
4.
Bailey, D., & Palsha, S.A. ( 1992). Qualities of the Stages of Concern Questionnaire and implications for educational innovations. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 226-232.
5.
Bernheimer, L., & Keogh, B. ( 1995). Weaving interventions into the fabric of everyday life: An approach to family assessment. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 15, 415-433.
6.
Bernheimer, L., & Weisner, T. ( 2007). "Let me tell you what I do all day. . .": The family story at the center of intervention research and practice. Infants and Young Children, 20, 192-201.
7.
Brinker, R.P., Frazier, W., & Baxter, A. ( 1992). Maintaining involvement of inner city families in early intervention programs through a program of incentives: Looking beyond family systems to societal systems. OSERS News in Print, 4, 8-17.
8.
Brorson, K. ( 2005). The culture of a home visit in early intervention. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 3, 51-76.
9.
Brotherson, M.J. ( 1994). Interactive focus group interviewing: A qualitative research method in early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 14, 101-118.
10.
Buysee, V., & Wesley, P. ( 2004). Consultation in early childhood settings. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
11.
Campbell, P.H., Chiarello, L., Wilcox, J., & Milbourne, S. ( 2009). Preparing therapists as effective practitioners in early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 22, 21-31.
12.
Campbell, P.H., & Halbert, J. ( 2002). Between research and practice: Provider perspectives on early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education , 22, 213-226.
13.
Campbell, P.H., & Sawyer, L.B. ( 2007). Supporting learning opportunities in natural settings through participation-based services. Journal of Early Intervention , 29, 287-305.
14.
Campbell, P.H., & Sawyer, L.B. ( 2009). Changing early intervention providers? Home visiting skills through participation in professional development. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28, 219-234.
15.
Cheung, D., Hattie, J., & Davis, N.G. ( 2001). Re-examining the Stages of Concern Questionnaire: A test of alternative models. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 226-236.
16.
Dunst, C.J., Trivette, C.M., Humphries, T., Raab, M., & Roper, N. ( 2001). Contrasting approaches to natural learning environment interventions. Infants and Young Children, 14, 48-63.
17.
Fullan, M. ( 2008). The six secrets of change. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.
18.
Hall, G., & Hord, S.M. ( 2001). Implementing change: Patterns, principles, and potholes . Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
19.
Hall, G., & Louks, S.F. ( 1977). A developmental model for determining whether the treatment is actually implemented. American Education Research Journal , 14, 263-276.
20.
Hanft, B., Rush, D., & Shelden, M. ( 2004). Coaching families and colleagues in early childhood. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes.
21.
Hebbeler, K., Spiker, D., Morrison, K., & Mallik, S. ( 2008). A national look at the characteristics of Part C early intervention services. In C. Peterson, L. Fox, & P. M. Blasco (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and toddlers and their families: Practices and outcomes (Young Exceptional Children Monograph 10, pp. 1-18). Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood.
22.
Hughes, K. ( 2005). Providing interventions to infants and toddlers through family-guided routines based intervention (FGRBI): Implications for learning disabilities. In G. Sideridis & T. A. Citro (Eds.), Research to practice: Effective interventions in learning disabilities (pp. 168-192). Boston: Learning Disabilities Worldwide.
23.
Hughes, K., & Peterson, C.A. (2008). Conducting home visits with an explicit theory of change. In C. Peterson , L. Fox, & P. M. Blasco (Eds.), Early intervention for infants and toddlers and their families: Practices and outcomes (Young Exceptional Children Monograph 10, pp. 47-59). Missoula, MT: Division for Early Childhood.
24.
Killion, J., & Todnem, G. ( 1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48, 14-16.
25.
Kim, J.-M., & Mahoney, G. ( 2004). The effects of mother’s style of interaction on children’s engagement: Implications for using responsive intervention with parents. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education , 24, 31-38.
26.
Kochanska, G. ( 1997). Mutually responsive orientation between mothers and their young children: Implications for early socialization. Child Development, 6, 94-112.
27.
LeCompte, M.D., & Preissle, J. ( 1993). Ethnography and qualitative design in educational research (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
McCollum, J., & Yates, T. ( 1994). Dyad as focus, triad as means. A family-centered approach to supporting parent-child interactions. Infants and Young Children, 6, 54-63.
30.
National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center, Work-group on Principles and Practices in Natural Environments. (2008 ). Agreed upon practices for providing early intervention services in natural environments (OSEP TA Community of Practice-Part C Settings). Retrieved August 5, 2009, from http://www.nectac.org
31.
National Research Council. (2002). Scientific research in education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
32.
Peterson, C.A., Luze, G.J., Eshbaugh, E.M., Jeon, H., & Kantz, K.R. ( 2007). Enhancing parent-child interactions through home visiting: Promising practice or unfulfilled promise? Journal of Early Intervention, 29, 119-140.
33.
Rogers, E.M. ( 2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
34.
Sandall, S., Hemmetter, M.L., Smith, B., & McLean, M. (2005). DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide for application. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
35.
Sandall, S., Smith, B., & McLean, M. (2000). DEC recommended practices . Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
36.
Schon, D. ( 1987). Educating the reflective practitioner. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
37.
Slough, S.W., & Chamblee, G.E. (2007). Technology as an innovation in science and mathematics teaching. School Science and Mathematics , 107, 222.
38.
Stake, R. ( 1995). The art of case research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
39.
Wasik, B.H., & Bryant, D.M. ( 2001). Home visiting: Procedures for helping families (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40.
Woods, J. ( 2005). Final report: Family-Guided Routines Based Intervention Project. Submitted to U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs. Tallahassee: Florida State University, Department of Communication Sciences.
41.
Woods, J., Kashinath, S., & Goldstein, H. ( 2004). Effects of embedding caregiver-implemented teaching strategies in daily routines on children’s communication outcomes. Journal of Early Intervention, 26, 175-193.
42.
Yin, R.K. ( 1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
