Kentucky has developed an assessment and accountability system that provides outcome data for a set of state early childhood standards for children birth to 5 years of age that are aligned with early childhood outcomes designated by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP). Within this flexible and comprehensive state assessment system, early intervention and care providers, district preschool personnel, and childcare program staff select a criterion-referenced, curriculum-based assessment (CBA) tool to monitor children's progress. The system is designed so that data from these CBA tools can be used for three purposes: (a) to demonstrate child progress and inform instruction at the individualized intervention or classroom level; (b) to promote program improvement and plan program, district, and state supports through the aggregation of assessment data at the program, district, and state level; and (c) to report on child progress to evaluate the success of federal, state, or district programs and initiatives.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bagnato, S., & Neisworth, J. (1983). Monitoring developmental progress of young exceptional children: The curricular efficacy index. The Journal of Special Education, 17, 189—193.
2.
Bodrova, E., Leong, D., & Shore, R. (2004). Child outcomes standards in Pre-K programs: What are standards; What is needed to make them work?National Institute for Early Education Research. Retrieved on October 21, 2006, fromhttp://nieer.org/
3.
Bricker, D., Capt, B., & Pretti-Frontczak, K. (2002). Assessment, evaluation, and programming system for infants and children (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
4.
Brigance, A.H. (2004). Brigance diagnostic inventory of early development—II . North Billerica, MA: Curriculum Associates.
5.
Browder, D., Flowers, C., Ahigrim-Delzell, M.K., Spooner, F., & Algozzine, R. (2004). The alignment of alternative assessment content with academic and functional curricula. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 211—223.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1993). The ecology of cognitive development: Research models and fugitive findings. In R. H. Wozniak & K. W. Fischer (Eds.), Development in context (pp. 3—44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
Burchinal, M.R., Roberts, J.E., Nabors, L.A., & Bryant, D.M. (1996). Quality of child care and infant cognitive and language development. Child Development, 67, 606—620.
8.
Burns, M.S., Midgette, K., Leong, D., & Bodrova, E. (2003). Prekindergarten benchmarks for language and literacy: Progress made and challenges to be met. Retrieved on February 18, 2004, from http://nieer.org/docs/indec.php?DocID=61 .
9.
Chazan-Cohen, R., Jerald, J., & Stark, D.R. (2001). A commitment to supporting the mental health of our youngest children. Zero to Three, 22, 4—12.
10.
Clarke-Stewart, K.A., Gruber, C.P., & Fitzgerald, L.M. (1994). Children at home and in day care. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum .
11.
Cohen, M.A., & Gross, P.J. (1979). The developmental resource: Behavioral sequences for assessment and program planning. New York: Grune & Stratton.
12.
Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory . New York: Harcourt, Brace & Jovanovich.
13.
Deno, S.L. (2003). Developments in curriculum-based measurement. The Journal of Special Education, 37, 184—192.
14.
Deno, S.L., Marston, D., & Tindal, G. (1986). Direct and frequent curriculum-based measurement: An alternative for educational decision making. Special Services in the Schools, 2, 5—27.
15.
Dichtelmiller, M.L., Jablon, J.R., Marsden, D.B., & Meisels, S.J. (2001). The work sampling system: Omnibus guidelines preschool through third grade. New York: Pearson Early Learning.
16.
Dodge, D.T., Colker, L.J., & Heroman, C. (2001). The creative curriculum developmental continuum assessment system. Washington, DC: Teaching Strategies.
17.
Dunn, L. (1993). Proximal and distal features of day care quality and children's development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly , 8, 167—192.
18.
Feldman, A.B., Haley, S.M., & Coryell, J. (1990). Concurrent and construct validity of the Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory. Physical Therapy, 70, 602—610.
19.
Flowers, C., Browder, D., & Ahlgrim-Delzell, L. (2006). An analysis of three states' alignment between language arts and mathematics standards and alternate assessments. Exceptional Children, 72, 201-215.
20.
Good Start Grow Smart. (2002). Available from http://www.whitehouse.gov/infocus/earlychildhood/toc.html
21.
Good, R.H., Simmons, D.C., & Kame'enui, E.J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257—288.
22.
Governor's Early Childhood Task Force. (1999 ). KIDS NOW: Kentucky invests in developing success. Frankfort, KY: Author.
23.
Harbin, G., Rous, B., & McLean, M. (2005). Issues in designing state accountability systems. Journal of Early Intervention, 27, 137—164.
24.
High/Scope Educational Research Foundation. ( 2003). Preschool child observation record (2nd ed.). Ypsilanti, MI: Author.
25.
Howes, C. (1997). Children's experiences in center-based child care as a function of teacher background and adult-child ratio. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 43, 404—425.
26.
Johnson-Martin, N.M., Attermeier, S.M., & Hacker, B.J. (2004). The Carolina curriculum for infants & toddlers with special needs (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
27.
Kamphaus, R.W., & Lozano, R. (1984). Developing local norms for individually administered tests. School Psychology Review, 18, 213—228.
28.
Kendall, J.S. (2003, April). Setting standards in early childhood education . The First Years of School, 60, 64—68.
29.
Kentucky Department of Education. (2005). State performance plan. Frankfort, KY: Author.
30.
Kentucky Early Childhood Development Authority, Kentucky Revised Statute Chap. 211, § 120, 200.703 (2000).
31.
Kentucky General Assembly. (1990). Kentucky education reform act of 1990. Gen. Assembly, Reg. Sess., Vol. 1.
32.
Kontos, S., & Wilcox-Herzog, A. (1997). Research in review: Teachers' interactions with children: Why are they so important?Young Children, 52, 4—12.
33.
Lewis, D.M., & Haug, C.A. (2005). Aligning policy and methodology to achieve consistent across-grade performance standards. Applied Measurement in Education, 18, 11—34.
34.
Lund, I., Rous, B.S., Purvis, H., & Moffett, C.L. (2003). Profiles on state pre-kindergarten standards and accountability systems: Technical report 2. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Interdisciplinary Human Development Institute, State Preschool Accountability Research Collaborative.
35.
Macy, M.G., Bricker, D.D., & Squires, J.K. (2005). Validity and reliability of a curriculum-based assessment approach to determine eligibility for Part C services. Journal of Early Intervention, 28, 1—16.
36.
McCormick, K., & Brennan, S. (2001). Mentoring the new professional in early childhood special education: The Kentucky Teacher Internship Program. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 131—147.
37.
McLaughlin, M.J., Henderson, K., & Rhim, L.M. (1998). Snapshots of reform: How five local districts are interpreting standards-based reform for students with disabilities. Alexandria, VA: National Association of State Boards of Education, Center for Policy Research on the Impact of General and Special Education Reform.
38.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (1997). NAEYC Position Statement: Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children birth through 8. Washington, DC: Author.
39.
Naeyc and Naecs/Sde. (2002). Joint position statement: Early learning standards: Creating the conditions for success. Retrieved January 27, 2004, from http://www.naeyc.org/about/positions/pdf/position_statement.pdf
40.
Naeyc and Naecs/Sde. (2003). Joint position statement: Early childhood curriculum, assessment, and program evaluation building an effective, accountable system in programs for children birth through age 8. Retrieved January27, 2004, from http://www.naeyc.org/resources/position_statements/CAPEexpand.pdf
41.
Neisworth, J., & Bagnato, S. (2004). The mismeasure of young children: The authentic assessment alternative. Infants and Young Children, 17, 198—212.
42.
Neisworth, J., & Bagnato, S. (2005). DEC recommended practices: Assessment. In S. Sandall, M. L. Hemmeter, B. Smith, & M. McLean (Eds.), DEC recommended practices: A comprehensive guide. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
43.
Neuman, S.B., & Roskos, K. (2005). The state of state pre-kindergarten standards . Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 20, 125—145.
44.
Newberry, N., & Howard, M. (Eds.). (2005). Building a strong foundation for school success: Kentucky's early childhood quality self-study. Frankfort: Kentucky Department of Education .
45.
Newborg, J. (2005). Battelle developmental inventory—2. Riverside, CA: Riverside Publishing.
46.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 et seq. (2002)
47.
Parks, S. (2006). Inside HELP: Administration and reference manual for HELP. Palo Alto, CA: VORT Corp .
48.
Peisner-Feinberg, E., Burchinal, M., Clifford, R., Culkin, M., Howes, C., Kagan, S., et al. (2001). The relation of preschool child-care quality to children's cognitive and social developmental trajectories through second grade. Child Development, 72, 1534—1554.
49.
Phillips, C., Howes, C., & Whitebook, M. (1991). Child care as an adult work environment. The Journal of Social Issues, 47, 49—70.
50.
Rous, B., Grove, J., & Townley, K. (2007). Developing a statewide early childhood professional development framework. Dimensions, 35(1), 29—36.
51.
Rous, B., & Townley, K. (Eds.). (2004). Building a strong foundation for school success: Kentucky's early childhood continuous assessment guide . Frankfort: Kentucky Department of Education.
52.
Ruopp, R., Travers, J., Glantz, F., & Coelen, C. (1979). Children at the center: Summary findings and their implications. Final report of the national day care study: Children at the center. Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates .
53.
Sanford, A.R., Zelman, J.G., Hardin, B.J., & Peisner-Feinberg, E. (2004). The early learning accomplishment profile (3rd ed.). Chapel Hill, NC: Chapel Hill Training Outreach Project.
54.
Salvia, J., & Ysseldyke, J.E. (2007). Assessment in special and inclusive education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
55.
Scott-Little, C., & Kagan, S.L. (2004). The breadth and depth of early learning standards . Greensboro, NC: SERVE.
56.
Shinn, M. R. (Ed.). (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
57.
Shinn, M., & Marston, D. (1985). Differentiating mildly handicapped, low-achieving, and regular education students: A curriculum-based approach. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 31—38.
58.
Shinn, M.R., Tindal, G.A., Spira, D.A., & Marston, D. (1987). Practice of learning disabilities as social policy . Learning Disability Quarterly, 10, 17—28.
59.
Shinn, M.R., Ysseldyke, J.D., Deno, S.L., & Tindal, G.A. (1986). A comparison of difference between students labeled learning disabled and low achieving on measures of classroom performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 19, 545—552.
60.
Thurlow, M.L., & Thompson, S.J. (1999). District and state standards and assessments: Building an inclusive accountability system. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 12, 3—10.
61.
Webb, N.L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectation and assessments in mathematics and science education (NISE Research Monograph No. 6). University of Wisconsin—Madison, National Institute for Science Education . Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
62.
Zaslow, M., Halle, T., Martin, L., Cabrera, N., Calkins, J., Pitzer, L., et al. (2006). Child outcome measures in the study of child care quality [Electronic version]. Evaluation Review , 30, 577—610.
