A random sample of 967 early intervention providers in 33 different states completed a telephone survey that was conducted with computer-assisted telephone interview technology. The survey solicited information about the service providers' views of assistive technology (AT) for infants and toddlers with disabilities. In particular, questions elicited information regarding the use of AT, factors important to making decisions about AT, access to resources (e.g., funding, lending libraries), and provider training about AT in early intervention. Data were analyzed for the group as a whole, for specific disciplines, and in terms of the amount of training providers reported they had about AT in early intervention. Results indicated similar response patterns across disciplines, but differences in terms of reported training.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Benedict, R., Lee, J., Marrujo, S., & Farel, A. (1999). Assistive devices as an early childhood intervention: Evaluating outcomes. Technology andDisability, 11, 79—80.
2.
Bruder, M.B. (2000). Family-centered early intervention: Clarifying our values for the new millennium. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20(2), 105—115.
3.
Butler, C. (1986). Effects of powered mobility on self-initiated behaviors of very young children with locomotor disability. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 28, 325—332.
4.
Campbell, P.H., McGregor, G., & Nacik, E. (1994). Promoting the development of young children through use of adaptive and assistive technology. In P. H. Safford (Ed.), Yearbook in early childhood education: Early childhood special education (pp. 192—217). New York : Teachers College Press.
5.
Campbell, P.H., Milbourne, S.A., & Silverman, C. (2001). Strengths-based portfolios: A professional development activity to alter perspectives of children with special needs. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21(3), 152—161.
6.
Cook, A., & Cavalier, A. (1999). Young children using assistive robotics for discovery and control. Teaching Exceptional Children, 31, 72—78.
7.
Cress, C., & Marvin, C. (2003). Common questions about AAC services in early intervention. AAC: Augmentative & AlternativeCommunication, 19, 254—272.
8.
Daniels, L., Sparling, J., Reilly, M., & Humphry, R. (1995). Use of assistive technology with young children with severe and profound disabilities. Infant—Toddler Intervention, 5, 91—112.
9.
Glennen, S., & Church, G. (1992). Adaptive toys and environmental controls. In G. Church & S. Glennen (Eds.), The Handbook of Assistive Technology (pp. 173—205). San Diego: Singular Publishing.
10.
Judge, S. (2002). Family-centered assistive technology assessment and intervention practices for early intervention. Infants and Young Children, 15(1), 60—68.
11.
Judge, S., & Parette, H. (Eds.). (1998). Assistive technology for young children with disabilities: A guide for providing family-centered services . Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
12.
Lahm, E., & Sizemore, L. (2002). Factors that influence assistive technology decision-making . Journal of Special Education Technology, 17(1), 1—13.
13.
Lane, S.J., & Mistrett, S.G. (1996). Play and assistive technology issues for infants and young children with disabilities: A preliminary examination . Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 11(2), 96—104.
14.
Langone, J., Malone, D.M., & Kinsley, T. (1999). Technology solutions for young children with developmental concerns. Infants and Young Children, 11(4), 65—78.
15.
Lesar, S. (1998). Use of assistive technology with young children with disabilities: Current status and training needs. Journal of Early Intervention, 21, 146—159.
16.
McCormick, L. (1987). Comparison of the effects of a microcomputer activity and toy play on social and communication behaviors of young children. Journal of the Division for Early Childhood, 11, 195—205.
17.
McInerney, M., Osher, D., & Kane, M. (1997). Improving the availability and use of technology for children with disabilities. Washington, DC: Chesapeake Institute of the American Institutes for Research.
18.
Mistrett, S.G., Hale, M.M., Gruner, A., Sunshine, C., & McInerney, M. (2001). Synthesis on the use of assistive technology with infants and toddlers with disabilities (birth—two). Washington, DC: American Institutes of Research.
19.
National Early Intervention Longitudinal Study (NEILS). (2001). Services received by families and children in early intervention. In 23rd Annual Report to Congress on Implementation of IDEA (pp. 1— 69). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
20.
O'Connor, L., & Schery, T. (1986). A comparison of microcomputer-aided and traditional language therapy for developing communication skills in non-oral toddlers . The Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 51, 356—361.
21.
Office of Special Education Programs. (2005 ). December, 2003 Child Count Data. Retrieved May 31, 2005, from http://www.monitoringcenter.lsuhsc.edu/Part%20C_National%20Maps_2005_JPG/Slide9.JPG
22.
Parette, H., & Angelo, D. (1996). Augmentative and alternative communication impact on families: Trends and future directions. The Journal of Special Education, 30(1), 77—98.
23.
Parette, H., Huer, M., & Brotherson, M. (2001). Giving families a voice in augmentative and alternative communication decision-making. Education and Training in Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities , 35(2), 177—190.
24.
Phillips, B., & Zhao, H. (1993). Predictors of assistive technology abandonment . Assistive Technology, 5, 36—45.
25.
Romski, M.A., & Sevick, R.A. (2005). Augmentative communication and early intervention: Myths and realities. Infants and Young Children, 18(3), 174—185.
26.
Romski, M.A., Sevik, R.A., & Forrest, S. (2001). Assistive technology and augmentative and alternative communication in inclusive early childhood programs. In M. J. Guralnick (Ed.), Early childhood inclusion: Focus on change (pp. 465—479). Baltimore: Brookes.
27.
Schepis, M., Reid, D., Behrmann, M., & Sutton, K. (1998). Increasing communicative interactions of young children with autism using a voice output communication aid and naturalistic teaching. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 31, 561—578.
28.
Sullivan, M., & Lewis, M. (2000). Assistive technology for the very young: Creating responsive environments. Infants and Young Children, 12, 34—52.
29.
U.S. Department of Education. (1997). 19th annual report to Congress on the implementation of IDEA. Washington, DC: Author.
30.
U.S. Department of Education. (2000). 22nd annual report to Congress on the implementation of IDEA. Washington, DC: Author.
