This article provides a description of the Asset-Based Context Matrix (ABC Matrix). The ABC Matrix is an assessment tool for designing interventions for children in natural learning environments. The tool is based on research evidence indicating that children's learning is enhanced in contextually meaningful learning environments. The ABC Matrix focuses on three types of learning contexts (family activity settings, community activity settings, and early childhood activities) and five characteristics of child behavior (interests, assets, functionality, opportunity, and participation). Information is gathered through conversations with parents, as well as through interactions with and observations of the child in natural environments. The ABC Matrix yields a rich array of information about a child's everyday life that is useful for intervention planning. Sample questions, examples of information obtained, links to IFSP development, and a copy of the ABC Matrix are included.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bricker, D. (1996). Assessment for IFSP development and intervention planning. In S. J. Meisels & E. Fenichel (Eds.), New visions for the developmental assessments of infants and young children (pp. 169— 192). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
2.
Bricker, D. (2002). Assessment, evaluation, programming system (AEPS) for infants and children (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
3.
Bricker, D., Pretti-Frontczak, K., & McComas, N. (1998). An activity-based approach to early intervention (2nd ed.). Baltimore: Brookes.
4.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1992). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Six theories of child development: Revised formulations and current issues (pp. 187—248). Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley.
5.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1995). Developmental ecology through space and time: A future perspective. In P. Moen, G. H. Elder, Jr., & K. Lüscher (Eds.), Examining lives in context: Perspectives on the ecology of human development (pp. 619—647). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6.
Campbell, P.H., & Halbert, J. (2002). Between research and practice: Provider perspectives on early intervention. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education , 22, 213—226.
7.
Dunst, C.J. (2000). Revisiting “Rethinking early intervention .” Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 95—104.
8.
Dunst, C.J. (2001). Contextually mediated therapy and contextually mediated intervention. Unpublished manuscript, Family, Infant and Preschool Program, J. Iverson Riddle Developmental Center, Morganton, NC.
9.
Dunst, C.J., & Bruder, M.B. (1999). Family and community activity settings, natural learning environments, and children's learning opportunities [Entire issue] . Children's Learning Opportunities Report, 1(2).
10.
Dunst, C.J., Bruder, M.B., Trivette, C.M., Hamby, D., Raab, M., & McLean, M. (2001). Characteristics and consequences of everyday natural learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 68—92.
11.
Dunst, C.J., Bruder, M.B., Trivette, C.M., Raab, M., & McLean, M. (1998, May). Increasing children's learning opportunities through Families and Communities Early Childhood Research Institute: Year 2 progress report. Asheville, NC: Orelena Hawks Puckett Institute.
12.
Dunst, C.J., Bruder, M.B., Trivette, C.M., Raab, M., & McLean, M. (2001). Natural learning opportunities for infants, toddlers, and preschoolers. Young Exceptional Children, 4(3), 18—25. ( Erratum in Young Exceptional Children, 4(4), 25)
13.
Dunst, C.J., & Hamby, D. (1999a). Community life as sources of children's learning opportunities [Entire issue]. Children's Learning Opportunities Report, 1(4).
14.
Dunst, C.J., & Hamby, D. (1999b). Family life as sources of children's learning opportunities {Entire issue]. Children's Learning Opportunities Report, 1(3).
15.
Dunst, C.J., Hamby, D., Trivette, C.M., Raab, M., & Bruder, M.B. (2000). Everyday family and community life and children's naturally occurring learning opportunities. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 151—164.
16.
Dunst, C.J., Hamby, D., Trivette, C.M., Raab, M., & Bruder, M.B. (2002). Young children's participation in everyday family and community activity. Psychological Reports, 91, 875—897.
17.
Dunst, C.J., Herter, S., & Shields, H. (2000). Interest-based natural learning opportunities . In S. Sandll & M. Ostrosky (Eds.), Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series No. 2: Natural Environments and Inclusion (pp. 37—48). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
18.
Dunst, C.J., & Humphries, T.L. (2003, April). Achieving a better balance between child participation in everyday activity settings and child developmental benefits. Presentation made at the Biennial Meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Tampa, FL.
19.
Dunst, C.J., & Raab, M. (2004). Parents' and practitioners' perspectives of young children's everyday natural learning environments. Psychological Reports, 93, 251—256.
20.
Dunst, C.J., Trivette, C.M., Humphries, T., Raab, M., & Roper, N. (2001). Contrasting approaches to natural learning environment interventions. Infants and Young Children, 14(2), 48—63.
21.
Gallimore, R., & Goldenberg, C.N. (1993). The social construction and subjective reality of activity settings: Implications for community psychology . American Journal of Community Psychology, 21, 537—559.
22.
Gelman, R., Massey, C.M., & McManus, M. (1991). Characterizing supporting environments for cognitive development: Lessons from children in a museum. In L. B. Resnick & J. M. Levine (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 226—256). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association .
23.
Guberman, S.R. (1999). Supportive environments for cognitive development: Illustrations from children's mathematical activities outside of school. In A. Göncü (Ed.), Children's engagement in the world: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 202—227). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
24.
Hanft, B.E., & Pilkington, K.O. (2000). Therapy in natural environments: The means or end goal for early intervention?Infants and Young Children, 12(4), 1—13.
25.
Harris, S.R., & McEwen, I.R. (1996). Asessing motor skills. In M. McLean, D. B. Bailey, & M. Wolery (Eds.), Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs (pp. 305—333). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
26.
Hresko, W., Miguel, S., Sherbenou, R., & Burton, S. (1994). Developmental Observation Checklist System: A systems approach to assessing very young children. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
27.
Kellegrew, D.H. (1998). Creating opportunities for occupation: An intervention to promote the self-care independence of young children with special needs . American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 52, 457—465.
28.
Linder, T.W. (1990). Transdisciplinary play-based assessment: A functional approach to working with young children. Baltimore: Brookes.
29.
McWilliam, R., Ferguson, A., Harbin, G., Porter, D.M., & Vaderviere, P. (1998). The family-centeredness of individualized family services plans. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 18, 69—82.
30.
Meisels, S.J. (1996). Charting the continuum of assessment and intervention . In S. J. Meisels & E. Fenichel (Eds.), New visions for the developmental assessments of infants and young children (pp. 27— 52). Washington, DC: Zero to Three.
31.
Nelson, K. (1999, Winter). Making sense: Language and thought in development. DevelopmentalPsychologist, 1—10.
32.
Raab, M., & Dunst, C.J. (in press). Early intervention practitioner approaches to natural environment interventions. Journal of Early Intervention.
33.
Rainforth, B., & Roberts, P. (1996). Physical therapy. In R. A. McWilliam (Ed.), Rethinking pull-out services in early intervention: A professional resource (pp. 243—266). Baltimore : Brookes.
34.
Riksen-Walraven, J.M. (1978). Effects of caregiver behavior on habituation rate and self-efficacy in infants. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 1, 105—130.
35.
Shelden, M.L., & Rush, D.D. (2001). The ten myths about providing early intervention services in natural environments. Infants and Young Children , 14(1), 1—13.
36.
Stremel, K., Matthews, P., Wilson, R., Molden, V., Yates, C., Busbea, B., et al. (1992, December). Facilitating infant/toddler skills in family-child routines. Paper presented at the Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood International Conference on Children with Special Needs, Washington, DC.
37.
Walsh, S., Rous, B., & Lutzer, C. (2000). The federal IDEA natural environments provisions . In S. Sandall & M. Ostrosky (Eds.), Young Exceptional Children Monograph Series No. 2: Natural Environments and Inclusion (pp. 3—15). Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
38.
Wilcox, J.M., & Shannon, M.S. (1996). Integrated early intervention practices in speech-language pathology. In R. A. McWilliam (Ed.), Rethinking pull-out services in early intervention: A professional resource (pp. 217—242). Baltimore: Brookes .
39.
Wolery, M. (1989). Using assessment information to plan instructional programs. In D. B. Bailey (Ed.), Assessing infants and preschoolers with handicaps (pp. 478—495). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
40.
Wolery, M. (1996). Early childhood special and general education . In R. A. McWilliam (Ed.), Rethinking pull-out services in early intervention: A professional resource (pp. 185—215). Baltimore: Brookes .
