A general outcome measurement system designed for use in early childhood represents an alternative to current assessment practices. This article describes an application of a general outcome measurement system, Individual Growth and Development Indicators (IGDIs), with 68 preschool children attending early childhood programs in east-central Minnesota. IGDIs were administered on three occasions from January to May at four early childhood sites, with one site implementing an intervention after the second administration. Results indicated that the measures were easy to use; were efficient in administration, scoring, and data interpretation; and provided valuable information for making decisions about early childhood education and special education. Obtained rates of growth over time were similar to those for other applications of IGDIs and demonstrated some sensitivity to intervention.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, M.J., Foorman, B.R., Lundberg, I., & Beeler, T. (1998). Phonemic awareness in young children. Baltimore: Brookes.
2.
Bagnato, S.J., & Neisworth, J.T. (1991). Assessment for early intervention: Best practices for professionals. New York: Guilford Press.
3.
DEC Task Force on Recommended Practice. (1993 ). DEC recommended practices: Indicators of quality in programs for infants and young children with special needs and their families. Reston, VA: Council for Exceptional Children.
4.
Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative . Exceptional Children, 52, 219—232.
5.
Deno, S.L. (1997). Whether thou goest . . . Perspectives on progress monitoring. In J. W. Lloyd & E. J. Kameenui (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities: LEA's series on special education and disability (pp. 77—99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
Dunn, L.M., & Dunn, L.M. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test (3rd ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
7.
Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development. (1998a). Research and development of individual growth and development indicators for children between birth and age eight (Technical Report No. 4). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
8.
Early Childhood Research Institute on Measuring Growth and Development. (1998b). Theoretical foundations of the Early Childhood Institute on Measuring Growth and Development: An early childhood problem-solving model (Technical Report No. 6). Minneapolis : University of Minnesota.
Fuchs, L.S., & Shinn, M.R. (1989). Writing CBM IEP objectives. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 130—152). New York: Guilford Press.
11.
Good, R.H., III, & Jefferson, G. (1998). Contemporary perspectives on curriculum-based measurement validity. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement (pp. 61— 88). New York: Guilford Press.
12.
Good, R.H., III, & Kaminski, R.A. (1996). Assessment for instructional decisions: Toward a proactive/prevention model of decisionmaking for early literacy skills. School Psychology Quarterly, 11, 326—336.
13.
Horton, C., & Bowman, B.T. (2002). Child assessment at the preprimary level: Expert opinion state trends. Chicago: Erickson Institute, Herr Research Center.
14.
Howe, K.B., Scierka, B.J., Gibbons, K.A., & Silberglitt, B. (2003). A school-wide organization system for raising reading achievement using general outcome measures and evidence-based instruction: One education district's experience. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3&4), 59—72.
15.
Lonigan, C.J., Burgess, S.R., Anthony, J.L., & Barker, T.A. (1998). Development of phonological sensitivity in 2- to 5-year-old children. Journal of Educational Psychology , 90, 294—311.
16.
Marston, D.B. (1989). A curriculum-based measurement approach to assessing academic performance: What it is and why do it. In M. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum-based measurement: Assessing special children (pp. 18—78). New York: Guilford Press.
17.
McConnell, S.R. (2000). Assessment in early intervention and early childhood special education: Building on the past to project into our future. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 43—48.
18.
McConnell, S.R., Preist, J.S., Davis, S.D., & McEvoy, M.A. (2002). Best practices in measuring growth and development for preschool children. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 1231—1246). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists .
19.
Neisworth, J.T., & Bagnato, S.J. (1996). Assessment for early intervention: Emerging themes and practices. In S. L. Odom & M. E. McClean (Eds.), Early intervention/early childhood special education: Recommended practices (pp. 23—57). Austin, TX: PRO-ED .
20.
Notari-Syverson, A., O'Connor, R.E., & Vadasy, P.F. (1998). Ladders to literacy: A preschool activity book . Baltimore: Brookes.
21.
Odom, S.L. (2001). A worthy challenge: Assessing child developmental growth in a systematic manner. Journal of Early Intervention , 24(3), 188—190.
22.
Priest, J.S. (1998). Continuous progress measurement: Developing an observational instrument for preschoolers in early childhood special education classrooms. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
23.
Pyle, R.P. (2002). Best practices in assessing kindergarten readiness. The CaliforniaSchool Psychologist, 7, 63—73.
24.
Shinn, M.R. (1995). Best practices in curriculum-based measurement and its use in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 547—567). Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists .
25.
Smith, L.D., Best, L.A., Stubbs, D.A., Archibald, A.B., & Roberson-Nay, R. (2002). Constructing knowledge: The role of graphs and tables in hard and soft psychology. American Psychologist, 57, 749—761.
