This article describes parents' evaluation of a Web site intended to provide practical information about recommended practices such as activity-based or embedded instruction to families whose young children have disabilities or are at developmental risk. Twenty-one parents from 10 states conducted an online evaluation of the site, SPIES for Parents, judging its content and ease of use. The data were analyzed using quantitative and qualitative methods. Results indicated that the Internet can be an effective medium for disseminating information about recommended practices to families. The parent group found the Web site to be helpful, useful, and responsive to their needs and time constraints. Although they said that textual information was easy to access, some parents did note that they experienced technological problems in downloading video.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bandura, A., & Kupers, C.J. (1964). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 69(1), 1-9.
2.
Barnum, C.M. (2002). Usability testing and research. New York: Long-man.
3.
Brown, W.H., Odom, S.L., & Conroy, M.A. (2001). An intervention hierarchy for promoting young children's peer interactions in natural environments. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 21, 162-175.
4.
The Center for Persons with Disabilities. ( 1998). Strategies for preschool intervention in everyday settings: A video-assisted program for educators and families-Facilitator manual. Logan: Utah State University, Author.
5.
Culturally and Linguistically Appropriate Services, Early Childhood Research Institute. (n.d.). Strategies for preschool intervention in everyday settings: A video-assisted program for educators and families [videos and facilitator manual]. Available at http://ericps.crc.uiuc.edu/cgi-bin/clasSearch/viewitem.cgi?id=2524
6.
Coe, M. (1996). Human factors for technical communicators. New York: Wiley Computer Publishing.
7.
Driscoll, M. (1998) Web-based training: Using technology to design adult learning experiences. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.
8.
Dunst, C.J., Hamby, D., Trivette, C.M., Raab, M., & Bruder, M.B. (2000). Everyday family and community life and children's naturally occurring learning opportunities. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 151-164.
Hager, D., Kibler, C., & Zack, L. (1999). The basics of user friendly web design. Journal for Quality and Participation, 22(3), 58-62.
11.
Hart, B.M., & Risley, T.R. (1975). Incidental teaching of language in the preschool . Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 8, 411-420.
12.
Hepting, N.H., & Goldstein, H. (1996). What's natural about naturalistic language intervention?Journal of Early Intervention, 20, 249-265.
13.
Horn, E., Lieber, J., Li, S., Sandall, S., & Schwartz, I.S. (2000). Supporting young children's IEP goals in inclusive settings through embedded learning opportunities. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 208-223.
14.
Johnson, L.J., & LaMontagne, M.J. (1993). Using content analysis to examine the verbal or written communication of stakeholders within early intervention. Journal of Early Intervention, 17, 73-79.
15.
Kaiser, A.P., Hancock, T.B., & Nietfeld, J.P. (2000). The effects of parent-implemented enhanced milieu teaching on the social communication of children who have autism. Early Education and Development, 11, 423-446.
16.
Krug, S. (2000). Don't make me think: A common sense guide to web usability. Indianapolis: New Riders Publishing.
17.
Luck, D.D., & Hunter, J.M. (1997). Visual design principles applied to World Wide Web construction. In VisionQuest: Journeys toward visual literacy. Selected readings from the Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association (np). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408 985)
18.
Mobayed, K.L., Collins, B.C., Strangis, D.E., Schuster, J.W., & Hemmeter, M.L. (2000). Teaching parents to employ mand-model procedures to teach their children requesting. Journal of Early Intervention, 23, 165-179.
19.
Orkwis, R., DeCarme, J., & Glover, J. (1998). Research, innovation, and evaluation: Discretionary project supported by the Office of Special Education Programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, Fiscal Year 1997. Reston, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
20.
Orkwis, R., DeCarme, J., & Glover, J. (2001). Research, innovation, and evaluation: Discretionary project supported by the Office of Special Education Programs under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. Arlington, VA: The Council for Exceptional Children.
21.
Rowland, C.J. (1996). Formative evaluation of the videodisc-based curriculum: Naturalistic Instruction for Young Children with Disabilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utah State University, Logan.
22.
Rule, S. (1999). Development and evaluation of a program to teach naturalistic early intervention strategies in inclusive environments (Final Report, Project No. H029K50148). Submitted to U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, Washington, DC.
23.
Sandall, S., McLean, M.E., & Smith, B. (2000). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
Tisot, C.M., & Thurman, S.K. (2002). Using behavior setting theory to define natural settings: A family-centered approach. Infants and Young Children , 14(3), 65-71.
