Proficiency in movement, an important outcome in early childhood, is necessary for physical, cognitive, and social—emotional development. The development of an experimental measure for assessing growth in movement in children ages birth to 3 years is described. Based on general outcome measurement (GOM) procedures (e.g., Deno, 1997), the measure was intended for the identification of children having difficulty acquiring movement skills and the evaluation of the effectiveness of interventions for these children. Results from its use with a sample of 29 infants and toddlers demonstrated the feasibility of the measure. The 6-minute GOM was found to be reliable in terms of interobserver agreement and odd—even and alternate forms indices. Adequate criterion validity was demonstrated through use of a standardized measure of motor abilities and caregiver ratings of children's movement skills. The GOM was sensitive to changes in key skill elements and growth in total movement rate with age. This Movement GOM holds great promise as a quick, inexpensive, and readily interpretable means of monitoring growth in movement for children from birth to 3 years.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley scales of infant development (2nd ed.). New York: Psychological Corp.
2.
Bryk, A.S., & Raudenbusch, S.W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
3.
Bryk, A.S., Raudenbusch, S.W., Cheong, Y.K., & Congdon, R. (2000). HLM5: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling . Chicago: Scientific Software International .
4.
Burton, A.W., & Miller, D.E. (1998). Movement skill assessment. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
5.
Chandler, L. (1990). Neuromotor assessment. In E. M. Gibbs & D. Teti (Eds.), Interdisciplinary assessment of infants: A guide for early intervention professionals (pp. 45—61). Baltimore: Brookes .
6.
Cratty, B.J. (1986). Perceptual and motor developments in infants and children (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
7.
Deno, S.L. (1997). Whether thou goest . . . Perspectives on progress monitoring. In J. W. Lloyd, E. J. Kameenui, & D. Chard (Eds.), Issues in educating students with disabilities (pp. 77—99). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum .
8.
Deno, S.L., Mirkin, P.K., & Chaing, B. (1982). Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49(1), 36—45.
9.
Folio, M.R., & Fewell, R.R. (2000). The Peabody developmental motor scales (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
Fuchs, L.S., & Fuchs, D. (1999). Monitoring student progress toward the development of reading competence: A review of three forms of classroom-based assessment . School Psychology Review, 28, 659— 671.
13.
Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C.L. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect?School Psychology Review, 22(1), 27—48.
14.
Gallahue, D.L. (1989). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, and adolescents (2nd ed.). Carmel, IN: Benchmark Press.
15.
Gallahue, D.L., & Ozmun, J.C. (1995). Understanding motor development: Infants, children, adolescents, and adults (3rd ed.). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark.
Goldfield, E.C. (1995). Emergent forms: Origins and early development of human action and perception. New York: Oxford University Press.
18.
Greenwood, C.R., Luze, G.J., & Carta, J.J. (2002). Assessment of intervention results with infants and toddlers. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best practices in school psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 1219—1230). Washington, DC: National Association of School Psychologists .
19.
Hannan, T.E. (1987). A cross-sequential assessment of the occurrences of pointing in 3- to 12-month-old human infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 11, 381—410.
20.
Harris, S.R., & McEwen, I.R. (1996). Assessing motor skills . In M. McLean, D. B. Bailey, & M. Wolery (Eds.), Assessing infants and preschoolers with special needs (pp. 305—333). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Merrill/ Prentice Hall.
21.
Hartmann, D.P. (1977). Considerations in the choice of interobserver reliability estimates. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis , 10, 103— 116.
22.
Hatton, D.D., Bailey, D.B., Burchinal, M.R., & Ferrell, K.A. (1997). Developmental growth curves of preschool children with vision impairments. Child Development, 68(5), 788—806.
23.
Kaminski, R.A., & Good, R.H. (1996). Toward a technology for assessing basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 25, 215—227.
24.
Kirshner, B., & Guyatt, G.H. (1985). A methodologic framework for assessing health indices. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 38, 27—36.
25.
Kuntz, S. (2001). Caregiver assessment of movement skills—Gross motor. Kansas City, KS: University of Kansas, Juniper Gardens Children's Project.
26.
Lewin, L.M., Hops, H., Davis, B., & Dishion, T.J. (1994). Multimethod comparison of similarity in school adjustment of siblings and unrelated children. Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 963—969.
27.
Luze, G.J., Linebarger, D.L., Greenwood, C.R., Carta, J.J., Walker, D., Leitschuh, C., et al. (2001). Developing a general outcome measure of growth in expressive communication of infants and toddlers. School Psychology Review, 30(3), 383—406.
28.
McConnell, S.R. (2000). Assessment in early intervention and early childhood special education: Building on the past to project into the future. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 20, 43—48.
29.
McConnell, S.R., McEvoy, M.A., Carta, J.J., Greenwood, C.R., Kaminski, R., Good, R.H., et al. (1996). Early childhood research institute on program performance measures: A growth and development approach. Washington, DC: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN: Proposal funded by the Early Education Programs for Children with Disabilities, Office of Special Education and Rehabilitation Services, U.S. Office of Education.
30.
McConnell, S.R., McEvoy, M.A., Carta, J.J., Greenwood, C.R., Kaminski, R., Good, R.H., et al. (1998). Research and development of exploring solutions assessments for children between birth and age eight. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED452639)
31.
Miller, L.J., & Roid, G.H. (1996). The T.I.M.E.: Toddler and infant motor evaluation . San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corp.
32.
Mowder, B.A. (1997). Typical infant development. In A. H. Widerstrom, B. A. Mowder, & S. R. Sandall (Eds.), Infant development and risk: An introduction (pp. 25—60). Baltimore: Brookes.
33.
Payne, V.G., & Isaacs, L.D. (1991). Human motor development: A lifespan approach (2nd ed.). Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
34.
Piper, M.C., & Darrah, J. (1993). Motor assessment of the developing infant. Philadelphia: Saunders.
35.
Piper, M.C., & Darrah, J. (1994). The Alberta infant motor scale (AIMS). Philadelphia: Saunders.
36.
Priest, J.S., McConnell, S.R., Walker, D., Carta, J.J., Kaminski, R.A., McEvoy, M.A., et al. (2001). General growth outcomes for children between birth and age eight: Where do we want young children to go today and tomorrow?Journal of Early Intervention, 24(3), 163—180.
37.
Ramey, C.T., Breitmayer, B.J., & Goldman, B.D. (1984). Learning and cognition during infancy. In M. J. Hanson (Ed.), Atypical infant development (pp. 237—279). Baltimore: University Park Press.
38.
Smith, K.U., & Smith, W.H. (1962). Perception and motion. Philadelphia : Saunders.
39.
Thelen, E., & Smith, L.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
