Critiquing Claims About Global Warming From the World Wide Web: A Comparison of High School Students and Specialists

Abstract

The ability to evaluate scientific claims made in various media sources is a critical component of scientific literacy. This study compares how a group of 12th grade students and a group of specialists, including scientists and policy analysts with expertise in global warming, evaluated an editorial about global warming published by an oil company on the World Wide Web. Participants were asked to read the editorial and were asked a set of interview questions about it. Examples from the specialists’ interviews indicate the kinds of responses that are possible with in-depth scientific knowledge. In comparison, although some examples from the students’interviews illustrate competent performance for a nonexpert, other student responses illustrate possible pitfalls. The approach of the present study affords a constructive route for formulating goals for scientific literacy. The approach permits identifying examples of students evaluating scientific claims in more or less competent ways—claims that are in the context of an important socioscientific issue and an actual media source.

Keywords

High school students expert-novice studies global warming climate change scientific literacy media literacy

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams, S. (1999a). What is “good reasoning” about global warming? A comparison of high school students and specialists (Doctoral dissertation, University of California, Berkeley, 1998). Dissertation Abstracts International, 59(08), 2911-2911.

Adams, S. (1999b). Views of policies affecting automobiles: A comparison of high school students and specialists. Bulletin of Science, Technology, & Society, 19, 372-380.

American Association for the Advancement of Science . (1993). Benchmarks for scientific literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Gore, A. (1998, November). The politics of scientific illiteracy. In Global Change [On-line]. Available: www.globalchange.org. Oakland, CA: Pacific Institute for Studies in Development.

Helvarg, D. (1996, December 16). The greenhouse spin: Energy companies try the ‘tobacco’ approach to evidence of global warming. The Nation, 263, 21-24.

Houghton, J. T. , Meira Filho, L. G. , Callander, B. A. , Harris, N. , Kattenberg, A. , & Maskell, K. (1996). Climate change 1995: The science of climate change. New York: Cambridge University Press.

National Research Council . (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Rutherford, F. J. , & Ahlgren, A. (1990). Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.