“Global Environmental Problems Require Global Solutions”: A Case Study in Ecomessianism

Abstract

Many Western environmental activist groups and theorists have sounded the call for the Earth’s salvation from the “global environmental crisis.” What is lacking, however, is some reflection on the ramifications of framing the problem globally and on the justifications for particular solutions. This article examines the “ecomessiah” (saviors of the Earth) phenomenon to investigate the impacts of these types of programs. Specifically, we examine the “global environmental ethic” proposed by J. Baird Callicott. His program, presented as an inclusive system that incorporates non-Western belief systems, trades heavily on Western science as an authority and a justification. We contend that his ethic, although well-intentioned, rests on assumptions and uses of science that subvert both non-Western ideologies and non-Western interests rather than revere them. Consequently, the inherent flaws undermine the feel-good one-world rhetoric that he espouses.

Keywords

Environmentalism globalism Callicott ecomessianism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Callicott, J. B. (1990). The case against moral pluralism. Environmental Ethics, 12, 99-124.

Callicott, J. B. (1994). Earth insights: A survey of ecological ethics from the Mediterranean Basin to the Australian Outback. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the Third World. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Gadgil, M. , & Guha, R. (1992). This fissured land, An ecological history of India. Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

Gudynas, E. (1993). The fallacy of ecomessianism: Observations from Latin America. In W. Sachs (Ed.), Global ecology: A new arena of political conflict (pp. 170-178). London: Zed Books.

Guha, R. (1989). Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A Third World critique. Environmental Ethics, 11, 71-83.

Hargrove, E. C. (1989). Foundations of environmental ethics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Luke, T. W. (1997). Ecocritique: Contesting the politics of nature, economy, and culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

10.

Mellor, M. (1997). Feminism & ecology. New York: New York University Press.

11.

Merchant, C. (1989). Ecological revolutions: Nature, gender, and science in New England. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

12.

Nash, R. (1982). Wilderness and the American mind (3rd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original work published 1967)

13.

Norton, Bryan G. (1991). Toward unity among environmentalists. New York: Oxford University Press.

14.

Shiva, V. (1993). The greening of the global reach. In W. Sachs (Ed.), Global ecology: A new arena of political conflict (pp. 149-156). London: Zed Books.

15.

Shiva, V. (1995). Globalism, biodiversity and the Third World. In H. Norberg-Hodge , P. Goering , & S. Gorelick (Eds.), Future of progress: Reflections on environment and development (pp. 50-67). Foxhole, Dartington, UK: Green Books.

16.

Zimmerman, M. E. (1994). Contesting earth’s future: Radical ecology and postmodernity. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.