As we approach the 21st century, the threat of nuclear Armageddon has lessened somewhat, but a new threat has emerged: biological warfare. The splitting of the atom eventually led to the detonation of atomic bombs, and the discovery of DNA may soon lead to the use of genetic weapons. This article argues that the scientific community has a responsibility to help protect the world against the threat of biological weapons.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS). (1980). Principles of scientific freedom and responsibility. Washington: Author.
2.
Cole, L. (1996, December). The specter of biological weapons. Scientific American.
3.
Gavaghan, H. (1998). Arms control enters the biology lab. Science,281, 29-30.
4.
Heinsenberg, W. (1971). Physics and beyond. New York: Harper & Row.
5.
Kass, L. (1985). Toward a more natural science: Biology and human affairs. New York: Free Press.
6.
Mackenzie, D. (1998, September). Bioarmageddon. New Scientist.
7.
Marshall, E. (1998). Biomedical groups derail fast-track anticloning bill. Science, 279, 1123-1124.
8.
National Bioethics Advisory Commission. (1997). Cloning human beings: Report and recommendations of the National Bio-ethics Advisory Commission. Rockville, MD.
9.
Ramsey, P. (1977). Fabricated man: The ethics of genetic control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
10.
Rifkin, J. (1998). The biotech century. New York: Penguin.
11.
Venter, A. (1998, May 1). Keeping the lid on germ warfare. Jane’s Defense Weekly.
