American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1994). Science For All Americans. Oxford University Press, Inc., New York, NY.
2.
AikenheadG.S. (1985). Collective Social Decision Making: Implications for Teaching Science. In GoslingD. & MusschengaB. (Eds.), Science eEducation and Ehical Values (pp. 55-67). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
3.
AndersonC.W. & SmithE.L. (1986). Teaching sScience (Report No. 168). East Lansing, MI: Institute for Research on Teaching, Michigan State University.
4.
BrunkhorstH.K. (1985). Ethics, Values and sScience Teaching. In Science, Technology, Society (1985 Yearbook of the National Science Teachers Association (pp. 213-219). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
5.
ButtsR.F. (1979). The Revival of Civic Learning. Social Education43 (5), 359-364.
6.
BybeeR.W. (1985). The Restoration of Confidence in Science and Technology Education. School Science and Mathematics85 (2), 95-108.
7.
BybeeR. W., HarmsN. C., WardB., & YagerR.E. (1980). Science, Society and Science Education. Science Education64 (3), 377-395.
8.
DedeckerP.F. (1986). Biology and Ethics: Their Role in Education for the 80s and Beyond. The American Biology Teacher48 (5), 285-292.
9.
EijkelhofH. (1985). Ethics in the Classroom: Goals and Experiences. In GoslingD. & MusschengaB. (Eds.), Science Education and Ethical Values(pp. 68-78). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
10.
GermannP. J., HaskinsS., & AulsS. (1996). Analysis of Nine High School Biology Laboratory Manuals: Promoting Scientific Inquiry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching33 (5), 475-499.
11.
HarmsN.C. & YagerR. E. (Eds.) (1981). What Research Says to the Science Teacher Vol. 3. Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
12.
HurdP.D. (1981). Biology Education. In HarmsN.C. & YagerR.E. (Eds.), What Research Says to the Science Teacher., Vol. 3 (pp. 12-32). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
13.
HurdP.D. (1989). A New Commitment to Students. The American Biology Teacher51 (6), 341-345.
14.
HurdP.D. (1990). Change and Challenge in Science Education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching27 (5), 13-14.
15.
HurdP.D. (1994). New Minds for a New Age: Prologue to Modernizing the Science Curriculum. Science Education78 (1), 103-116.
16.
HutchinsonG.E. (1983). Marginalia: What is Science For? American Scientist71 (6), 639-644.
17.
JonesR.L. & ZuckerA. (1986). Is Science Really Value Free? The Science Teacher53 (2), 39-41.
18.
KellermanL.R. (1993). An Issue as an Organizer: A case study. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), What Research Says to the Science Teacher Vol. 7 (pp 141-145). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
19.
LapointeA., MeadN. A., & PhillipsG.W. (1989). A World of Differences: An International Assessment of Mathematics and Science. Princeton, NJ: National Assessment of Educational Progress, Educational Testing Service.
20.
LumpeA.T. & ScharmannL.C. (1991). Meeting Contemporary Goals for Lab Instruction: A Content Analysis of Two Secondary Biology Textbooks. School Science and Mathematics91 (6), 231-235.
21.
McComasW.F. (1993). STS Education and the Affective Domain. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), What Research Says to the Science Teacher Vol. 7 (pp 161-168). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
22.
McComasW.F. (1996). The Affective Domain and STS Instruction. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education (pp 70-83). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
23.
McCormackA.J. (1984). An Overture. The American Biology Teacher46(1), 11.
24.
McCormackA.J. & YagerR.E. (1989). A New Taxonomy of Science Education. The Science Teacher56 (2), 47-48.
25.
McInerneyJ.D. (1986). Biology Textbooks: Whose Business? The American Biology Teacher48 (7), 396-400.
26.
McShaneJ.B. & YagerR.E. (1996). Advantages of STS for Minority sStudents. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education (pp 131-138). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
27.
MillerJ.D. (1989). Scientific Literacy. Paper presented at the American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
28.
MillerJ.D. (1992). The Public Understanding of Science and Technology in the United States 1990. Report to the National Science Foundation. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation, Division of Science Resources Studies.
29.
MillerJ.D. (1996). Scientific Literacy for Effective Citizenship. In R.E. Yager (Ed.), Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education (pp 185-204). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
30.
MyersL. (1996). Mastery of Basic Voncepts. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Science Education (pp 53-58). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
31.
National Center for Education Statistics (1992). The 1990 Science Report Card. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
32.
National Research Council. (1996). National Science Education Standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
33.
National Science Teachers Association. (1982). Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s. Position Paper. Washington, DC: Author.
34.
RubbaP.A. & WiesenmayerR.L. (1993). Increased Actions by Dtudents. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), What Research Says to the Science Tacher Vol. 7 (pp 169-175). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
35.
SingletonR.Jr. & BrockD.H. (1982). Teaching Bioethics from an Interdisciplinary Perspective. The American Biology Teacher44 (5), 280-285, 313.
36.
The Woodrow Wilson National Fellowship Foundation. (1992). Bioethics: 1992 Curriculum Module. Princeton, NJ: Author.
37.
U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1991). State of the Scene: Science Education in the Nation. Rockville, MD: Public Health Service.
38.
VarrellaG.F. (1996). Using Ehat Has Been Learned: The Spplication Fomain in an STS-Constructivist Detting. In R.E. Yager (Ed.), Science/Technology/Society as Reform in Dcience Education (pp 95-108). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
39.
WeissI.R. (1993). Science Teachers Rely on the Textbook. In R. E. Yager (Ed.), What Research Says to the Science tTacher Vol. 7 (pp 169-175). Washington, DC: National Science Teachers Association.
40.
YagerR.E. (1991). The Constructivist Learning Model: Toward Real Reform in Science Rducation. The Science Teacher58 (6), 52-57.
41.
YagerR.E. & TweedP. (1991). Planning More Appropriate Biology Education for Sschools. The American Biology Teacher53 (8), 479-483.