BarlettD.L. & SteeleJ.B. (1992). America: What Went Wrong. Kansas City: Andrews and McMeel.
2.
BarrettW. (1987). Death of the Soul. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
3.
BowersC.A. (1993). Education. Cultural Myths, and the Ecological Crisis: Toward Deep Changes. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
4.
DamarinS.K. (1991). “Rethinking Science and Mathematics Curriculum and Instruction: Feminist Perspectives in the Computer Era.” Journal of Education, 173 (1), 107-123.
5.
DamarinS.K. (1992). “Women and Information Technology: Framing Some Issues for Education.” Feminist Teacher, 6 (2), 16-20.
6.
EllulJ. (1964). The Technological Society (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). New York, NY: Knopf.
7.
EllulJ. (1990). The Technological Bluff. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.
8.
HabermasJ. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol. 1. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. (T. McCarthy, Trans.) Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981.
9.
HabermasJ. (1987). The Theory of Communicative Action: Vol 2. Lifeworld and System: A Critique of Functionalist Reason (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1981.
10.
HlynkaD. & BellandJ. C. (Eds.). (1991). Paradigms Regained: The Uses of Illuminative, Semiotic, and Post-modern Criticism as Modes of Inquiry in Educational Technology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
11.
IllichI. (1976). The Medical Nemesis: The Expropriation of Health. NY: Pantheon Books.
12.
IllichI. (1971). Deschooling Society. NY: Harper and Row.
13.
KoettingJ.R. (1993). “Educational Technology, Curriculum Theory, and Social Foundations: Toward a New Language of Possibility.” In MuffolettoR. & KnupferN.N. (Eds.), Computers in Education: Social, Political, and Historical Perspectives (pp. 129-139). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
14.
NicholsR.G. (1986). “Word Processing and Basic Writers.” The Journal of Basic Writing, 5, 81-97.
15.
NicholsR.G. (1991). “Reconciling Educational Technology with the Lifeworld: A Study of Habermas' Theory of Communicative Action.” In HlynkaD. & BellandJ. (Eds.), Paradigms Regained: Uses of Illuminative, Semiotic and Post Structural Criticism as a Mode of Inquiry in Educational Technology (pp. 121-137). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
16.
NicholsR.G. & Allen-BrownV. (1996). “Critical Theory and Educational Technology.” In D. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Macmillan LIBRARY Reference USA.
17.
NobleD.D. (1991). The Classroom Arsenal: Military Research, Information Technology, and Public Education. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
OngW. (1982). From Orality to Literacy: The Technologizing of the Word. NY: Methue.
20.
OrrD.W. (1992). Ecological Literacy: Education and the Transition to a Postmodern World. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
21.
PostmanN. (1985). Amusing Ourselves to Death. NY: Penguin Books.
22.
RobinsonR. S. (Ed.). (1990). [Special issue]. Journal of Thought. 25(1&2).
23.
SattinR. (Producer), SleeM. (1989). After the Warming [Film]. Maryland Public Television & Film Australia.
24.
StreibelM.J. (1986). “A Critical Analysis of the Use of Computers in Education.” Educational Communications and Technology – A Journal of Theory, Research, and Development, 34(3) 137-161.
25.
SuttonR.E. (1991). “Equity and Computers in the Schools: A Decade of Research.” Review of Educational Research, 61, 475-503.
26.
TaylorW.D. & JohnsenJ.B. (1986). “Resisting Technological Momentum.” In CulbertsonJ.A. & CunninghamL.L. (Eds.), Technology and Education (85th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education) (pp. 216-233). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
27.
WinnerL. (1977). Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28.
YeamanA.J. (Ed.). (1994b, February). “The Ethical Position of Educational Technology in Society” [Special issue.]. Educational Technology Magazine. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.