EliotGeorge, from “Middlemarch” in Bartlett's Familiar Ouotations, 16th Edition, Little, Brown and Company,Boston, MA,1992, p. 483, line 29.
2.
PostmanNeil, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY, 1992.
3.
PostmanNeil, Technopoly: The Surrender of Culture to Technology, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY, 1992, p. 20.
4.
Nartonis, DavidK., “An Answer to Neil Postman's Technopoly,” Bull. Sci. Tech. Soc. 13, 67-70 (1993).
5.
Cahoone, LawrenceE., The Dilemma of Modernity: Philosophy, Culture, and Anti-Culture. State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1988.
6.
Op. cit., Nartonis, p. 69.
7.
Op. cit., Nartonis, p. 69.
8.
BorgmannAlbert, Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life, The University of Chicago PressChicago, IL, 1984.
9.
BorgmannAlbert, Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life, The University of Chicago PressChicago, IL, p. 9.
10.
BorgmannAlbert, Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life, The University of Chicago PressChicago, IL, p. 9.
11.
MacKenzieDonald and JudyWajcman, eds., The Social Shaping of Technology; How the Refrigerator Got Its Hum, Milton Keynse: Open University Press, London, 1985, p. 4.
12.
Misa, ThomasJ., “How Machines Made History, and How Historians (and Others) Helped Them to Do So,” Sci. Tech., & Human Values. 13, (3&4), 309 (Summer & Autumn 1988).
13.
EllulJacques, The Technological Society, trans., WilkinsonJohn, KnopfAlfred A., New York, NY, 1964.
14.
Op. cit. Borgmann, p. 9.
15.
Op. cit. Borgmann, p. 10.
16.
Noble, DavidF., Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY, 1984, pp. 199-203.
17.
Noble, DavidF.America By Design: Science, Technology and the Rise of Corporate Capitalism, KnopfAlfred A., New York, NY, 1977, p. xviii.
18.
McGaw, JudithA., Most Wonderful Machine: Mechanization and Social Change in Berkshire Paper Making, 1801-1885, Princeton University Press,Princeton, NJ,1987, p. 6.
19.
Op. cit., Misa, p. 322.
20.
Op. cit., Borgmann, p. 11.
21.
Op. cit., Borgmann, p. 11.
22.
Op. cit., Misa, p. 322.
23.
Op. cit., Misa, p. 309.
24.
Op. cit., Borgmann, p. 15.
25.
Hughes, ThomasP., “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems,” in The Social Construction of Technological Systems eds., BijkerW.E.HughesT.P., PinchT.J., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987. pp. 76-80.
26.
Hughes, ThomasP., “The Evolution of Large Technological Systems,” in The Social Construction of Technological Systems eds., BijkerW.E.HughesT.P., PinchT.J., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1987, p. 76.
27.
Op. cit., Misa, p. 318.
28.
Op. cit., Borgmann, p. 15.
29.
Op. cit., Borgmann, p. 106.
30.
Op. cit., Borgmann, p. 105.
31.
Op. cit., Misa, p. 310.
32.
Op. cit., Postman, p. 106.
33.
Op. cit., Postman p. 179.
34.
Op. cit., Nartonis, p. 69.
35.
Tatum, JesseS., “Technology and Values: Getting beyond the 'Device Paradigm' Impasse,” Sci. Tech., & Human Values, 19, (1), (Winter 1994).
36.
MoriartyGene, “Ethics, Ethos, and Engineering,” submitted to the Journal of Business and Professional Ethics.
37.
Zimmerman, MichaelE., “Deep Ecology's Mode of 'Technology Assessment',” in New Worlds, New Technologies. New Issues, eds., CutcliffeStephen, et. al., Lehigh University Press, Bethlehem, PA, 1992, p. 175.