American Association for the Advancement of Science Interim Committee. (1957, January 25). Social aspects of scienceScience, 125, 13-47.
2.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1978). Resource directory of programs and courses in the field of ethics and values in science and technology.Washington, DC: Author.
3.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. Washington, DC: Author.
4.
Barnard, J.D. (Ed.). (1960). Rethinking science education. The 59th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5.
Beauchamp, W.L. (1932). Instruction in science (Bulletin No. 17; National Survey of Secondary Education, Monograph No. 22Washington, DC: Superintendent of Documents.
6.
Bernal, J.D. (1939). The social function of science. New York: Macmillan.
7.
Best, J.H. (Ed.). (1983). Historical inquiry in education.Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
8.
Bieglow, M.A. (1906). College entrance options in zoologySchool Science and Mathematics, 6, 63-66
9.
. Buck, P.H. (1945). Report of the Harvard Committee: General education in a free society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10.
Bush, V. (1945). Science: The endless frontier (Reprint, 1960Washington, DC: The National Science Foundation.
11.
Caldwell, O. (1909). A consideration of the principles that should determine courses in biology in secondary schoolsSchool Science and Mathematics,9, 241-247
12.
. Clarke, F.W. (1880). A report on the teaching of chemistry and physics in the United States (Circular of Information No. 6Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Education.
13.
Commission on Secondary School Curriculum. ( 1938). Science in general education.New York: D. Appleton-Century.
14.
Committee of Associated Institutions of Science and Arts. (1861). Objectives and plan for an institute of technology.Boston: John Wilson & Son . (Photocopy courtesy of Institute Archives, M.I.T.)
15.
Curtis. F.D. (1939). Third digest of investigations in the teaching of science. Philadelphia: P. Blakiston's Son & Co.
16.
de Nemours, D. (1923). National education in the United States (Trans. from the second Frencn ed., 1812Newark: University of Delaware Press.
17.
Dick. H. (Ed.). (1955). Selected writings of Francis BaconNew York: Random House.
18.
Downing, E.B. (1925). Teaching science in the schools.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
19.
Eddy. Jr., E.D. (1956). Colleges for our land and time. New York: Harper & Brothers.
20.
England, J.M. (1982). A patron for pure science: The National Science Foundation's formative years.1945-1957 . Wasnington, DC. National Science Foundation.
21.
Franklin, B. (1743). A proposal for promoting useful knowledge among the British plantations in Amenca. (Quotations are from a photocopy of the original manuscript, courtesy of Yale University Library)
22.
Galloway, T.W. (1910). Report of the committee on fundamentals of the Central Association of Science and Mathematics TeachersSchool Science and Mathematics, 10, 801-813
23.
. Hurd. P. (1949). A crtical analysis of the trends in secondary school science teaching 1895-1948. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University.
24.
Hurd, P. (1984). Reforming science education: The search for a new vision. Washington. DC: Council for Basic Education.
25.
Hurd, P. (1985). Science education for a new age: The reform movementNASSP Bulletin, 69, 83-92
26.
. Hurd, P. (1986). Perspectives for the reform of science educationPhi Delta Kappan, 67, 353-358.
27.
Hurd, P. (1989). Problems and issues in science curriculum reform and implementation In W. Rosen (Ed.), High school biology: Today and tomorrow (pp 291-297). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Linville, H.R. (1909). The practical use of biologySchool Science and Mathematics,9, 121-130.
31.
Mann, C.R. (1906). A new movement among physics teachers. School Review, 14, 212-215, 429-437, 652-659, 746-753; 15, 290
32.
. Margeneau, H. (Ed.). (1972). Integrative principles of modern thought.New York: Gordon & Breach.
33.
National Commission on Excellence in Education,. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
34.
National Education Association. (1894). Report of the Committee of Ten on secondary school studies.New York: American Book Co.
35.
National Science Foundation. (1990). NSF to support statewide reforms in science, math, and engineering educationNSF Directions, 3(3), 1
36.
. Noll, V.H. (1939). The teaching of science in elementary and secondary schools.New York: Longmans, Green.
37.
Powers, S.R. (1932). A program for teaching science, the thirty-first yearbook; part I. National Society for the Study of EducationBlooming-ton, IL: Public School Publishing.
38.
President's Science Advisory Committee. (1959 ). Education for the age of science. Washington, DC: The White House.
39.
Reorganization of science in secondary schools (Bulletin No. 26). (1920). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
40.
Report of the Advisory Committee for Science Education. (1970). The task ahead for the National Science Foundation (No. 71-13). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.
41.
Resnick, L.B. (1983, April 9). Mathematics and science learning: A new conceptionScience, 228, 477-478.
42.
Spencer, H. (1859). Education: Intellectual, moral and physical.New York: John B. Alden.
43.
Steelman, J.R. (1947). Science and public policyWashington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
44.
Thayer, V.T. (1938). Science in general education. New York: D. Appleton-Century.