Science for All Americans - a Project 2061 Report on Literacy Goals in Science, Mathematics, and Technology. Washington, DC,: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 1989:
2.
Adams D. L..“Science Education for Non-Majors: the Goal is Literacy, the Method is Separate Courses,”.Bull. Sci. Tech. Soc.. 1990;10 (3): 125-129
3.
Aikenhead G. S..“Categories of STS Instruction,”.STS Research Network Missive. 1989;3 (2): 20-23
4.
Ben-ChaimD.JoffeN.ZollerU.“Empowerment of Israeli Elementary School Teachers to Implement an STS Oriented Science Curriculum Reform.” Submitted to J. Research in Science Teaching, 1990.
5.
Bybee R. W..“Science Education and the Science-Technology-Society (STS) Theme.”.Science Education. 1987;71 (5): 667-683
6.
Bybee R. W.,Hurd P. D..“National Leaders Reflect on STS”.(interview by L. Waks and B. Barchi), NASTS News. 1990;3 (5): 3-4
7.
Costa M.The Golden Section, Solomon's Seal and the Magen David. Tel-Avia,: Sifriat Poalim; 1990:
8.
Fleming R..“Literacy for a Technological Age,”.Science Education. 1989;73 (4): 391-404
9.
Hart E. P.,Robottom I. M..“The Science-Technology-Society Movement in Science Education. A Critique of the Reform Process,”.J. Research in Science Teaching. 1990;27 (6): 575-588
10.
McCormick R..“Technology and the National Curriculum: the Creation of a ‘Subject’ by Committee,”.The Curriculum Journal. 1990;1 (1): 39-51
11.
NSTA, The Scope, Sequence and Coordination Project. NSTA Reports. National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC, 1989.
12.
Technology, a National Imperative. International Technology Education Association; 1988:
13.
Tobin K.,Fraser B. J..“What Does it Mean to be an Exemplary Science Teacher,”.J. of Research in Science Teaching. 1990;27 (1): 3-25
14.
Waks L. J..“Reflections on Technological Literacy.”.Bull. Sci. Tech. Soc.. 1986;6 (2/3): 331-336
15.
Yager R. E.Science, Technology and Society: Resources for Science Educators (1985 AETS yearbook). James R. K., ed. Columbus, OH,: Association for Education of Teachers in Science and SMEAC Information Reference Center; 1988:46-55.
16.
Yager R. E..“An Alternative View.”.J. of College Science Teaching. 1985;14 (3): 223-224
17.
ZollerU.“Problem-Solving and Decision-Making in Science-Technology-Environment-Society (STES) Education,” in Science and Technology and the Quality of Life, K. Riguarts, ed. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on World Trends in Science and Technology Education. IPN-Materialen, Vol. 2, Kiel, 1987, pp. 562–569
18.
Zoller U.Working Together to Educate about the Environment. Gross M. G., ed. Troy, OH,: The NAEE/CEA; 1989:371-377.
19.
ZollerU.“The Technology/Education Interface: STES Education for All,”Canadian Journal of Education. Accepted for publication, 1991.
20.
ZollerU.“Environmental Education and the University. The ‘Problem Solving - Decision Making Act’ within a Critical System Thinking Framework,” Higher Education in Europe, 1990a, in print
21.
Zoller U.,Ebenezer J.,Morley K.,Paras S.,Sandbert V.,West C.,Wolthers T.,Tan S. H..“Goal Attainment in Science-Technology-Society (STS) Education and Reality: The Case of British Columbia,”.Science Education. 1990;74 (1): 19-36
22.
ZollerU.“The Internationalization of STS: Intentions, Reality, Future Promises,” in What Research Says about the STS Movement, R. Yager, ed. NSTA monograph, 1991 (in print)
