BeMillerJ.N., “Summation.” The Chemist66(10), 3 (1989).
2.
BenjaminS., “An Ideascape for Education: What Futurists Recommended.” Educational Leadership47 (1), 8-14 (1989).
3.
CarlisleE.R., “Educating for the Future.” Planning & Changing19 (3), 131-140 (1989).
4.
CPC Salary Survey, “A Study of 1988-89 Beginning Offers.” Bethlehem, Pennsylvania: College Placement Council, Inc., 1989.
5.
CavazosL., “Huge Problem in American Schools: Science and Mathematics Education.” The Generational Journal2 (1), 15-16 (1989).
6.
DeLoughryD.J., “Panel Urges Colleges to Boost Production of Minority Scientists.” Chronicle of Higher Education34(40), A1, 32 (1988).
7.
DeRoseJ.V., LockardJ.D. and PaldyL.G., “The Teacher is the Key: A Report on the Three NSF Studies.” The Science Teacher46 (6), 31-37 (1979).
8.
FrankelA.J., “Chemical Risk and the Public Perception.” The Chemist66(8), 15, 22 (1989).
9.
GainesB.R., and VickersJ.N., “Design Considerations for Hypermedia Systems.” Microcomputer for Information Management5 (1), 1-27 (1988).
10.
GrayP.E., “America's Ignorance of Science and Technology Poses a Threat to the Democratic Process Itself.” Chronicle of Higher Education34(36), B1-2 (1988).
11.
HofwoltC.A., “Instructional Strategies in the Science Classroom.” In Research within Reach: Science Education, HoldzkomD. and LutzP.B., eds. Washington, DC: NSTA (1984).
12.
KennedyD., As reported under “Science-Bashing in San Francisco.”Chemisry in Britain25(3), 239 (1989).
13.
National Science Foundation, The State of U.S. Science and Engineering. Washington, DC: US. Government Printing Office, pp. 1-2, 1988.
14.
PatruskyB., “On an Antidote for Science Phobia.” Issues in Science and Technology5 (1), 94-98 (1988).
15.
RaizenS.A., Increasing Educational Productivity Through Improving the Science Curriculum. Center for Policy Research in Education Series RR-006 A Consortium: New Jersey. Rutgers, NJ: Rutgers Unversity Press, 1988.
16.
RossiterB.W., “Chemistry, the Mother Science: A Solver of Problems and Hope of the World.” The Chemist65 (5), 11-13(1988).
17.
ReynoldsW.A., “Replenishing the Science Pipeline.” Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science92(1-2) 1–3 (1989).
18.
SchwartzA.T., “Science Education: Opportunities and Obligations.” Journal of Minnesota Academy of Science54(11) 3-9 (1988).
19.
ShymanskyJ.A. and AlridgeB.E., “The Teacher Crisis in Secondary School Science and Mathematics.” Educational Leadership40 (2), 61-62 (1982).
20.
SlaughterJ.B., “American Science - A Disturbing Fragility.” Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science92(3-4) 119–120(1989).
21.
WiseK.C. and OkeyJ.R., “A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Various Science Teaching Strategies on Achievement.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching20 (3), 419-425 (1983).