BöhmeG., “Demarcation as a strategy of Exclusion: Philosophers and Sophists,” in BöhmeG. and StehrN., Eds., The Knowledge Society. Dordrecht: Reidel. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 10. 1986.
2.
DolbyR.G.A., “Science and Pseudo-Science: The Case of Creationism.” Zygon 22, 195-212 (1987).
3.
KendallJ., Journal of Chemical Education2, 376 (1925).
4.
KingM.D., “Reason, Tradition and the Progressiveness of Science.” History and Theory10, 3-32 (1971).
5.
KuhnT.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1970.
6.
LatourB. and WoolgarS.. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1970.
7.
“Parallax” (i.e. Samuel Birley). Zetetic Astronomy. Earth not a Globe. 2nd ed. London: J.B. Day. 1873.
8.
PolanyiM., “The Growth of Science in Society.” Minerva 5, 533-545 (1967). Reprinted in his Knowing and Being. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1969.
9.
PopperK.R., Conjectures and Refutions. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul. 1974.
10.
ShapinS. and SchafferS.. Leviathan and the Air-Pump: Hobbes, Boyle and the Experimental Life. Princeton: Princeton University Press. 1985.
11.
SmedileS.R., Perpetual Motion and Modern Research for Cheap Power. Boston: Science Publications of Boston. 1962.
12.
ThomsonA., Tradition and Authority in Science and Theology. Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press. 1987.
13.
ThomsonA., “A Comparison of Scientific Research with Prayer and Worship.” Paper presented at the Science and Religion Forum Conference on Tradition and Authority in Science and Religion, 1988. Bull. Sci. Tech. Soc. 9, 302-311 (1989).
14.
TothM. and NielsenG., Pyramid Power. New York: Warner. 1976.
15.
ZimanJ., Reliable Knowledge: An Exploration of the Grounds for Belief in Science. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. 1978.
