AdlerEmmanuel, The Power of Ideology: The Quest for Technological Autonomy in Argentina and Brazil, The University of California Press, Berkeley, CA (1987).
2.
Agnew, HaroldB., “Civilian Uses of Nuclear Power: Status and Future,” Proceedings of the Symposium on Energy: Challenges and Opportunities for the Middle Atlantic States Vol. 2, John Hopkins University, Energy Research Institute, Baltimore, MD (1983).
3.
AndersonDouglas, Regulatory Politics and Electric Utilities: A Case Study in Political Economy, Auburn House, Boston (1981).
4.
AndersonJane et. A., “Decommissioning Commercial Nuclear Power Plants,” University of MinnesotaCenter for Urban and Regional Affairs, Minneapolis, MN (1980).
5.
Ayres, RussellW., “Pricing Plutonium: The Civil Liberties Fallout,” Harvard Civil Rights – Civil Liberties Law Review 10 374-443, (1975).
6.
BasallaGeorge, “Some Persistent Energy Myths,” in G. H. Daniels and M.H. Rose (eds.), Energy and Transport: Historical Perspectives on Policy Issues, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA (1982).
7.
BasallaGeorge, “Energy and Civilization,” in B. Star and P.C. Ritterbush (eds.), Science. Technology and the Human Prospect, Pergamon Press, New York, NY (1980).
8.
Boorstin, DanielJ., The Republic of Technology, Harper & Row, New York, NY (1978).
9.
BorgI.Y., Present and Future Nuclear Power Generation as a Reflection of Individual Countries Resources and Objectives, Lawrence Livermore Laboratory, Berkeley, CA (1987).
10.
BorgmannAlbert, Technology and the Character of Contemporary Life, University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1984).
11.
ByrneJohn and DanielRich, “In Search of the Abundant Energy Machine,” in J. Byrne and D. Rich (eds.), The Politics of Energy Research and Development 3, Energy Policy Studies Series, Transaction Press, New Brunswick (1986).
12.
ByrneJohn and StevenM. Hoffman, “Nuclear Power and Technological Authoritarianism,” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 7, 658-671 (1987).
13.
Camilleri, JosephA., The State and Nuclear Power: Conflict and Control in the Western World, Thetford, Wheatsheaf Books, Ltd., Norfolk, UK (1984).
14.
CarterLuther, Nuclear Imperatives and Public Trust, Resources for the Future, Washington, DC (1987).
15.
Chosen Daily News, “55 Nuclear Power Plants are Required for the Early 2000's,” 31 (June 2, 1989).
16.
Committee for Economic Development, Nuclear Power and National Security, Committee for Economic Development Washington, DC (1977).
17.
DescartesRene, Discourse on Method, trans. by LaurenceJ. LaFleur, Indianapolis (1956).
18.
The Economist, “Brazil's Nuclear Plans: In Search of Enrichment,” (March 5, 1988).
19.
EllulJacques, The Technological Society, Vintage Books, New York (1964).
20.
EnergyR and D and National Progress U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC (1965).
21.
Ferguson, EugeneS., “The American-ness of American Technology,” Technology and Culture 20(1) (January)3-24, (1979).
22.
FullerBuckminster, Excerpt from “Utopia and Oblivion,” in A. Teich ed., Technology and Man's Future, St. Martin's Press, NY, 137-155 (1977).
23.
Galbraith, JohnK., The New Industrial State (4th Ed.), Houghton Mifflin, Boston (1967).
24.
GreeleyHorace (ed.), Art and Industry in the Crystal Palace, New York (1853).
25.
Gunnell, JohnG., “The Technocratic Image and the Theory of Technocracy,” Technology and Culture 23(3) (July)392-416 (1982).
26.
Hewlett, RichardG. and FrancisDuncan, Atomic Shield, 1947-1952, A History of the United States Atomic Energy Commission, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA (1969).
27.
Hewlett, RichardG. and OscarE. AndersonJr., A. History of the United States Atomic Commission: The New World. 1939/1946 1, Pennsylvania State University Press, University Park, PA (1962).
28.
Hughes, ThomasP., Networks of Power: Electrification of Western Society, 1880-1930, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD (1983).
29.
Hyman, LeonardS., America's Electric Utilities: Past, Present and Future, 2nd edition, Public Utilities Reports, Burlington, VA (1985).
30.
India Today, “The Ultimate Dream” (May 15)87 (1988).
31.
IsardWalter and VincentWhitney, “Atomic Power and Economic Development,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 5(2) (March 1949).
32.
Kevles, DanielJ., The Physicists: The History of a Scientific Community in Modern America, Alfred A. Knopf New York (1977).
33.
KranzbergMelvin, “Can technological progress continue to provide for the future?,” in A. Weintraub et al., eds., The Economic Growth Controversy, International Arts & Science Press, White Plains, NY (1973).
34.
KranzbergMelvin and CarrolW. PursellJr., “Technology's Challenge,” in KranzbergM. and PursellC.Jr., eds., Technology in Western Civilization II, Oxford University Press, London695-707 (1967).
35.
KumarKrishan, Prophecy and Progress: The Sociology of Industrial and Post-Industrial Society, Penguin Books, New York (1978).
36.
Lilienthal, DavidE., Atomic Energy: A New Start, Harper & Row, New York (1980).
37.
Lilienthal, DavidE., This I Do Believe, Harper & Row, New York (1949).
38.
Los Angeles Times, “$2.1 Billion Nuclear Plant, Never Used, STands at Core of Philippines' Debt Crises,” 12-13 (June 12, 1986).
39.
MessingMarc, and Paul FriesemaH. and DavidMorell, Centralized Power: The Politics of Scale in Electricity Generation, Oeleschlager, Gunn and Hain, Cambridge (1979).
40.
MishanE.J., Technology and Growth: The Price We Pay, Praeger, NY (1971).
41.
MumfordLewis, “Authoritarian and Democratic Technics,” Technology and Culture 5(1) (January)1-8 (1964).
42.
Nuclear News, “Nuclebras privatized; CNEN made fully civilian” (October1988, 59); “Another year of growth,” (March 1988, 86); “Sixth Pacific Basin Nuclear Conference,” (November 1987, 98-110); “The changing world of nuclear power,” (January 1987, 83-90) (1987 and 1988).
43.
OppenheimerJ. Robert, “Atomic Explosives,” 3-17, in The Open Mind, Simon and Schuster, New York (1955) Transcript of a lecture delivered to the George Westinghouse Centennial ForumMay16, 1946.
44.
OrlansHarold, Contracting for Atoms, Brookings Institution, Washington, DC (1967).
45.
PathakK.K., Nuclear Policy of India: A Third World Perspective, Gitanjali Prakashan, New Delhi, India (1980).
PerrowCharles, Normal Accidents, Basic Books, New York (1984).
49.
Petterson, JohnS., “Perception vs. reality of radiological impact: The oiania model,” Nuclear News (November) 84-90 (1984).
50.
PonemanDaniel, Nuclear Power in the Developing World, George Allen & Unwin, Boston (1982).
51.
Power Engineering, “Nuclear Power Engineering,” (April) 10 (1988).
52.
Pursell, CarrolW.Jr. and MelvinKranzberg, “The Promise of Technology for the Twentieth Century,” in KranzbergM. and PursellC.Jr., eds., Technology in Western Civilization IIOxford University Press, London, 3-10 (1967).
53.
RambergBennet, “Learning From Chernobyl,” Foreign Affairs (Winter) 304-328 (1986/1987).
54.
SchumpeterJoseph, Capitalism. Socialism and DemocracyHoughton, Mifflin and CompanyNew York, NY (1955).
55.
SeidelRobert, “A Home for Big Science: The Atomic Energy Commission's Laboratory System,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences 16 (1), 135-175 (1986).
56.
Spector, LeonardS., “New players in the nuclear game,” Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists 45 (1), (January/February) 29-32 (1989).
57.
TaylorKeith, Ed. and trans., Henri Saint-Simon: Selected Writings on Science, Industry and Social Organisation, Croom Helm, London (1975).
58.
U.S. Congress, Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Energy Proliferation and Government Processes, of the Committee on Government Affairs (Senate)June 30 (1986).
59.
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Security: A Report to the President of the United States (1987).
60.
Weinberg, AlvinM., “Energy Policy in an Age of Uncertainty,” Issues in Science and Technology (Winter) 81-85 (1988-1989).
61.
Weinberg, AlvinM., “Nuclear Energy: Salvaging the Atomic Age,” The Wilson Quarterly (Summer) 88-115 (1979).