AikenheadGlen. Science in Social Issues: Implications for Teaching. Discussion paper for Science Council of Canada, Ottawa, 1982.
2.
AtkinJ.M., and RobertKarplus. “Discovery or Invention?” The Science Teacher29, 45-51 (1962).
3.
BybeeRodger. “Science Education and the Science-Technology-Society Theme.” Science Education 71(5) 667-683 (1987).
4.
CareySusan. “Cognitive Science and Science Education.” American Psychologist 41(10) 1123-1130 (1986).
5.
HurdPaul DeHart. “A Nation Reflects: The Modernization of Science Education.” Bull, of Science, Technology and Society7(2) 9-13 (1987).
6.
HurdPaul DeHart. “Biology for Life and Living: Perspectives for the 1980s” in HickmanF. and KahleJ.New Directions in Biology Teaching. Reston, VA: National Association of Biology Teachers (1982).
7.
HurdPaul DeHart. “Science, Technology and Society: New Goals for Interdisciplinary Teaching,” The Science Teacher42(2) 27-30 (February 1975).
8.
MooreJohn. Science as a Way of Knowing. Evolutionary Biology Vol. I. Baltimore: American Society of Zoologists (1983).
9.
MooreJohn. Science as a Way of Knowing. Human Ecology Vol. II. Baltimore: American Society of Zoologists (1985).
10.
MooreJohn. Science as a Way of Knowing. Genetics, Vol. II. Baltimore: American Society of Zoologists (1985).
11.
MooreJohn. Science as a Way of Knowing. Developmental Biology, Vol. IV. Baltimore: American Society of Zoologists (1987).
12.
National Science Board Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology. Educating Americans for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Science Foundation (1983).
13.
RoyRustum. “The Science/Technology/Society Connection,” Curriculum Review 24(3) 12-16 (January/February 1985).
14.
School Health Education Study.Health Education: A Conceptual Approach to Curriculum Design. Washington, DC (1967) p. 10.
15.
Shamos, MorrisH. “A False Alarm in Science Education.” Issues in Science and Technology IV(3) 65-69 (1988).
