Bonnstetter, R.J. (1984). Characteristics of teachers associated with an exemplary program compared with science teachers in general. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, The University of Iowa.
2.
Brunkhorst, B.J. and Padilla, M.J. (1986). Science Education for Middle and Junior High Students, a position statement of the National Science Teachers Association , Washington, DC.
3.
Champagne, A. and Klopfer, L. (1984). Research in science education: The cognitive perspective. Research within reach: Science Education Research and Development Interpretation Service, Appalachia Educational Laboratory, Inc., P.O. Box 1348, Charleston, WV 25325.
4.
Dagher, Zubeida (1986). Science and Society, Unpublished questionnaire, Science Education Center, The University of Iowa.
5.
Harms, N., Bybee R., and Yager, R. (1979). Science and Society: A Review of NAEP Data with Implications for Policies and Research. Interpretative Summary, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), Denver, Colorado.
6.
Harms, N.C. and Yager, R.E. (1981). What research says to the science teacher, Vol, 3. National Science Teachers Association , #471-14776, Washington, D.C.
7.
Helgeson, S.L., Blosser, P.E., and Howe, R.W. (1977). The status of pre-college science, mathematics, and social science education: 1955-75. The center for Science and Mathematics Education, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock No. 038- 000=00362-2, Washington, D.C. 20402.
8.
Hieronymus, A.N., Hoover, H.D., Lindquist, E.F., et al. (1986). The Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Science Supplement, The University of Iowa, Riverside Publishing Company.
9.
Hieronymus, A.N., Hoover, H.D., Lindquist, E.F., et al. (1986). The Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Preliminaiy Teacher's Guide, Multilevel Battery , Levels 9-14, Forms G/H, The University of Iowa, Riverside Publishing Company.
10.
Hieronymus, A.N., Hoover, H.D., Lindquist, E.F., et al. (1986). The Iowa Tests of Basic Skills, Social Studies and Science, Levels 9-14, Preliminary Teachers Guide, Supplement to Forms G/H, The University of Iowa, Riverside Publishing Company.
11.
Hoover, H.D., Director, Iowa Tests of Basic Skills (1987) in Consultation, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
12.
Hough, L. and Piper, M. (1982). The relationship between attitudes toward science and science achievement. Journal of Research in Science Teaching , 19/133-38.
13.
Hueftle, S., Rakow, S. and Welch, W. (1983). Images of science: A summary of results from the 1981-82 National Assessment in Science. Minnesota Research and Evaluation Center, University of Minnesota, June.
14.
Hurd, P. D.; ed. (1978). Early Adolescence: Perspectives and Recommendation to the National Science Foundation . National Science Foundation Directorate for Science Education: Office of Program Integration, Washington, DC 20402, Stock No. 038-000-003900-9.
15.
Hurd, P.D., et al. (1981) The Status of Middle School and Junior High School Science. Center for Educational Research and Evaluation , Boulder, Colorado.
16.
Hurd, P.D. (1982). Transformation of science education: Challenges and criteria. Science Education, 66(2), 281-285.
17.
Klopfer, Leo (1984). Research in science education: The cognitive perspective. Research within reach: Science Education. Research and Development Interpretation Service, Appalachia Educational Laboratory, Inc., P.O. Box 1348, Charleston, WV 24325.
18.
Lawrenz, F. (1975). The relationship between science teacher characteristics and student achievement and attitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 12, (4), 433-437.
19.
National Assessment of Educational Progress. ( 1978). The Third Assessment of science, 1976-77: 08-s-08 released exercise set (May). 1860 Lincoln St., Denver, Colorado .
20.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. ( 1983). A Nation at risk The imperative for educational reform. A report to the Nation and Secretary of Education, United States Department of Education, April.
21.
National Science Foundation. (1979). What are the needs in pre-college science, mathematics, and social science education? Views from the field. SE 80-9 NSF, Washington, DC.
22.
National Science Foundation. (1983). Educating Americans for the 21st Century; A plan of action for improving mathematics, science and technology education for all American elementary and secondary students so that their achievement is the best in the world by 1985. A report to the American People and the National Science Board. NSF , Washington, DC, 20-50a.
23.
National Science Foundation. (1983). A revised and intensified science and technology curriculum grades K-12 urgently need for our future. Recommendation of Conference on goals for science and technology education, K-12. Report to NSB Commission on Pre- college Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology. NSF, Washington, DC, March 11-13(b).
24.
National Science Teachers Association Position Statement. (1982). Science-Technology-Society: Science Education for the 1980s. NSTA, 1742 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20009.
25.
Ochs, V. D., ed. (1982). Improving Practices in Middle School Science: 1981 AETS Yearbook. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education.
26.
Penick, J. and Krajcik, J. , ed. (1985). Focus in Excellence Middle School/Junior High Science, Vol. 2 (2), National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC.
27.
Penick, J.E. and Yager, R.E. (1983). The search for excellence in science education. Phi Delta Kappan,64, (9), 621-623.
28.
Rakow, S.J., Hueftle, S.J., Welch, W.W. (1983). Images of Science: A Summary of Results from the 1981-82 National Assessment in Science. Minnesota Research and Evaluation Center, University of Minnesota.
29.
Rakow, S.J. (1983). The results of the 1982-83 National Assessment of Educational Progress in Science. Proceedings of Iowa Curriculum Update Conference, Science Education Center, The University of Iowa, July.
30.
Rothman, A.I. (1969). Teacher characteristics and student learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 6, (4), 340-348.
31.
Simmons, P.E. and Yager, R.E.Comparison of Student Attitudes About Science in a District With Multiple Exemplary Programs With Those Found Generally. Manuscript submitted for publication.
32.
Simpson, R.D. (1977). Relating student feelings to achievement in science, What Research Says to the Science Teacher, Vol. 1, National Science Teachers Association, Washington, DC.
33.
Stake, R.E., and Easley, J. (1987). Case studies in Science Education, Volumes I and II; Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champagne ; U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock No. 038-000-00376-3, Washington, DC 20402, 1978.
34.
Vargas, R.G. and Yager, R.E. (1987). Attitude of students in exemplary programs toward their science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. Vol. 24(1), 87-91.
35.
Vargas-Gomez, R.G. (1984). Comparison of science teacher opinions and student attitudes between samples drawn from schools with exemplary science programs and randomly selected ones. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52252.
36.
Voelker, A.M. (1982). The development of an attentive public for science: implications for science teaching. What Research Says to the Science Teacher , Vol. 4. national Sciences Teachers Association, Washington, DC. NSTA #471-14784.
37.
Weiss, I.R. (1978). Report of the 1977 Natural Survey of Science Mathematics, and Social Studies Education Teachers. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38.
Weiss, I.R. (1978). Report of the 1977 National Survey of Science, Mathematics, and Social Studies Education; Center for Educational Research and Evaluation, research Triangle Park, North Carolina ; U.S. Government Printing Office, Stock No. 038-000-00364. Washington, DC 20402.
39.
Welch, W.W. and Pella, M.O. (1967). The development of an instrument for inventorying knowledge of the processes of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, 64-68.
40.
Yager, R.E. (1981). What is known that should affect science education in the next decade. Iowa Curriculum Bulletin, 5, (2) 17-21.
41.
Yager, R.E. (1986). Personal relevance as a science curriculum focus in schools. Paper presented as part of a symposium at the 1986 Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, March 28-31. San Francisco.
42.
Yager, R.E. and Bonnstetter, R.J. (1984). Preferences and Understandings , Unpublished questionnaire. Science Education Center , The University of Iowa.
43.
Yager, R.E. and Bonnstetter, R.J. (1984). Student perceptions of science teachers, classes course content. School Science and Mathematics, 84, (5), 406-414.
44.
Yager, R.E. and Bonnstetter, R.J. (1985). Changes in perceptions for third, seventh, and eleventh grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22/4347-358.
45.
Yager, R.E. and Yager, S.O. (1985). Changes in perceptions of science for third, seventh, and eleventh grade students. Journal of research in Science accepted for publication in 1985.
46.
Yager, S.O. and Yager, R.E. (1984). The effects of school science upon select student perceptions across grade levels. The Ohio Journal of Elementary Science, 15, (1), 14-18.