Stuart S. Blume , Toward a Political Sociology of Science. New York: The Free Press, 1974.
2.
Brendan Gillespie, DaveEva and Ron Johnston, "Carcinogenic Risk Assessment in the United States and Great Britain: The Case of Aldrin/ Dieldrin ," Social Studies of Science, Vol. 9 (1979), 265-301.
3.
Carolyn Kopp, "The Origins of the American Scientific Debate over Fallout Hazards ," Social Studies of Science, Vol. 9 (1979), 403-422.
4.
Dorothy Nelkin , "The Political Impact of Technical Expertise ," Social Studies of Science, Vol. 5, No. 1, 35-54; Allan Mazur, "Disputes Between Experts," Minerva, Vol. 11 (1973), 243-262; D. Robbins and Ron Johnston, "The Role of Cognitive and Occupational Differentiation in Scientific Controversies," Social Studies of Science, Vol. 6 ( 1976), 349-368.
5.
Helga Nowotny, Kernenergie: Gefahr oder Notwendigkeit, Frankfurt/Main : Suhrkamp Verlag1979. Non-German speaking readers are referred to short extracts, H. Nowotny and H. Hirsch, "Information and Opposition in Austria's Nuclear Energy Policy," Minerva, XV, 3-4 (1978), 314-334; and H. Nowotny, "Experts in a Participatory Experiment: The Austrian Debate on Nuclear Energy," in Hans Skoie (Ed.): Scientific Expertise and the Public, Studies in Research and Higher Education, Oslo, 1979. H. Nowotny, "The Role of Experts in Developing Public Policy: The Austrian Debate on Nuclear Power, Science, Technology & Human Values, No. 32 (Summer 1980), 10-18.
6.
Helga Nowotny , "Scientific Purity and Nuclear Danger: The Case of Risk Assessment," in: E. Mendelsohn et al. (Eds.), The Social Production of Scientific Knowledge. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co. ( 1977), 243-264.
