Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The growing prominence of ChatGPT has sparked interest in its potential to improve both the quality and productivity of academic writing. This study aims to fill the knowledge gap regarding how research scholars perceive and engage with ChatGPT in the context of academic research writing. The primary objective was to assess scholars’ views on ChatGPT's efficiency, usefulness, and effectiveness in academic research writing, while also identifying possible improvements to better align with the scholars’ needs. A sequential explanatory mixed-methods approach was adopted, beginning with a quantitative phase and was subsequently followed by a qualitative phase involving semi-structured interviews. A sample of 317 research scholars drawn from diverse Indian higher education institutions. The findings reveal that research scholars generally perceive ChatGPT as moderately effective and useful in academic writing, though their perceptions of its usefulness vary. Although the overall user experience, certain ethical concerns were identified. Qualitative analysis showed that ChatGPT has the potential to enhance research writing, streamline processes, facilitate scholarly interactions, and support research writing challenges. However, areas needing improvement were also highlighted, including comprehensive topic coverage, cultural sensitivity, multilingual capabilities, and personalized support.

Keywords

artificial intelligence ChatGPT academic research writing research scholars mixed-method research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adamopoulou

Moussiades

(2020). Chatbots: History, technology, and applications. Machine Learning with Applications, 2, 100006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlwa.2020.100006

Akiba

Fraboni

M. C.

(2023). AI-supported academic advising: Exploring ChatGPT’s current state and future potential toward student empowerment. Education Sciences, 13(9), 885. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13090885

Aljanabi

(2023). ChatGPT: Future directions and open possibilities. Mesopotamian Journal of Cyber Security, 2023, 16–17. https://doi.org/10.58496/mjcs/2023/003

Alqahtani

(2024). Benefits, challenges, and attitudes toward ChatGPT in English writing courses at Saudi universities. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 6(2), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v6i2.1739

Asok

(2025). Decolonizing English language teaching: Integrating Indian cultural traditions through digital platforms. Digital Crossroads: Integrating Humanities, Science and Technology Edition, 1, 188–195. https://doi.org/10.9734/bpi/mono/978-93-48859-10-5/CH16

Azaria

Azoulay

Reches

(2023). ChatGPT is a remarkable tool – for experts. ArXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.03102

Baidoo-Anu

Leticia

O. A.

(2023). Education in the era of generative artificial intelligence (AI): Understanding the potential benefits of ChatGPT in promoting teaching and learning. Journal of AI, 7(1), 52–62. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4337484

Balcombe

(2023). AI Chatbots in digital mental health. Informatics, 10(4), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics10040082

Balhorn

L. S.

Weber

J. M.

Buijsman

Hildebrandt

J. R.

Ziefle

Schweidtmann

A. M.

(2024). Empirical assessment of ChatGPT’s answering capabilities in natural science and engineering. Scientific Reports, 14(1), https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54936-7

10.

Balta

(2023). Ethical considerations in using AI in educational research. Journal of Research in Didactical Sciences, 2(1), 51–53. https://doi.org/10.51853/jorids/14204

11.

Banerjee

(2023). Witnessing a paradigm shift: Assessing the role of artificial intelligence in the domain of education. International Journal of Advanced Research, 11(07), 553–557. https://doi.org/10.21474/ijar01/17259

12.

Bansal

Chamola

Hussain

Guizani

Niyato

(2024). Transforming conversations with AI - A comprehensive study of ChatGPT. Cognitive Computation, 16, 2487–2510. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-023-10236-2

13.

Barnwal

S. K.

Gupta

(2022). Evaluation of AI system’s voice recognition performance in social conversation. 5th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), 804–808. https://doi.org/10.1109/IC3I56241.2022.10073242

14.

Bolger

Wright

(2007). Reliability and validity in expert judgment. In Springer eBooks (pp. 47–76). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-34290-0_4

15.

Brotchie

E. A.

(2014). Academic publishing in India: Sites of reform and resistance. Publishing Research Quarterly, 30(1), 115–134. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-014-9347-6

16.

Burger

Kanbach

D. K.

Kraus

Breier

Corvello

(2023). On the use of AI-based tools like ChatGPT to support management research. European Journal of Innovation Management, 26(7), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-02-2023-0156

17.

Castleberry

Nolen

(2018). Thematic analysis of qualitative research data: Is it as easy as it sounds? Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 10(6), 807–815. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2018.03.019

18.

Castro

(2019). Blended learning in higher education: Trends and capabilities. Education and Information Technologies, 24(4), 2523–2546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09886-3

19.

Chukwuere

J. E.

(2024). Today’s academic research: The role of ChatGPT writing. Journal of Information Systems and Informatics, 6(1), 30–46. https://doi.org/10.51519/journalisi.v6i1.639

20.

Cortina

J. M.

(1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98

21.

Creswell

J. W.

(1999). Mixed-method research. In Elsevier eBooks. (pp. 455–472). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-012174698-8/50045-x

22.

Creswell

J. W.

Creswell

J. D.

(2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Sage Publications, Incorporated.

23.

Das

S. R.

J. V

(2024). Perceptions of higher education students towards ChatGPT usage. International Journal of Technology in Education, 7(1), 86–106. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijte.583

24.

Dawadi

Kukulska-Hulme

Seargeant

(2024). English For the Edi generation: Predicting and tracking the role of English and digital/mobile technologies in higher education across east and south Asia. INTED Proceedings, 1, 3091. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2024.0831

25.

De Blanes Sebastián

M. G.

Guede

J. R. S.

Antonovica

(2022). Application and extension of the UTAUT2 model for determining behavioral intention factors in use of the artificial intelligence virtual assistants. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.993935

26.

Deng

Lin

(2023). The benefits and challenges of ChatGPT: An overview. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 2(2), 81–83. https://doi.org/10.54097/fcis.v2i2.4465

27.

Dergaa

Chamari

Zmijewski

Saad

H. B.

(2023). From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: Examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biology of Sport, 40(2), 615–622. https://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623

28.

Teng

Chen

Wang

Gou

Wang

(2023). Chat with ChatGPT on intelligent vehicles: An IEEE TIV perspective. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Vehicles, 8(3), 2020–2026. https://doi.org/10.1109/tiv.2023.3253281

29.

Dwivedi

Y. K.

Kshetri

Hughes

Slade

E. L.

Jeyaraj

Kar

A. K.

, et al. (2023). Opinion paper: “so what if ChatGPT wrote it?” multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102642

30.

Essel

H. B.

Vlachopoulos

Essuman

A. B.

Amankwa

J. O.

(2024). ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100198

31.

Fang

Che

Mao

Zhang

Zhao

(2024). Bias of AI-generated content: an examination of news produced by large language models. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55686-2

32.

Følstad

Araujo

Law

E. L.

Brandtzaeg

P. B.

Papadopoulos

Reis

Luger

(2021). Future directions for chatbot research: An interdisciplinary research agenda. Computing, 103(12), 2915–2942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00607-021-01016-7

33.

García-Avilés

J. A.

(2020). Diffusion of innovation. In The international encyclopedia of Media psychology (pp. 1–8). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119011071.iemp0137

34.

Gayed

J. M.

Carlon

M. K. J.

Oriola

A. M.

Cross

J. S.

(2022). Exploring an AI-based writing assistant’s impact on English language learners. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100055. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100055

35.

Ghafouri

(2024). ChatGPT: The catalyst for teacher-student rapport and grit development in L2 class. System, 120, 103209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2023.103209

36.

Ghosh

Ness

Salunkhe

(2024). The role of AI enabled chatbots in omnichannel customer service. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 26(6), 327–345. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2024/v26i61184

37.

Golan

Reddy

Muthigi

Ramasamy

(2023). Artificial intelligence in academic writing: A paradigm-shifting technological advance. Nature Reviews Urology, 20(6), 327–328. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41585-023-00746-x

38.

Green

Willis

Hughes

Small

Welch

Gibbs

Daly

(2007). Generating best evidence from qualitative research: The role of data analysis. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 31(6), 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00141.x

39.

Guarte

J. M.

Barrios

E. B.

(2006). Estimation under purposive sampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 35(2), 277–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610910600591610

40.

Hackl

(2024). Assessing ChatGPT’s use of person-first language in healthcare conversations. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-023-00099-9

41.

Hammersley

(2015). On ethical principles for social research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 18(4), 433–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2014.924169

42.

Heigham

Croker

R. A.

(2009). Qualitative research in applied Linguistics. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517

43.

Hongxia

Razali

A. B.

(2025). Impact of ChatGPT on English academic writing ability and engagement of Chinese EFL undergraduates. International Journal of Instruction, 18(2), 323–346. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.18218a

44.

Huang

Tan

(2023). The role of ChatGPT in scientific communication: Writing better scientific review articles. American Journal of Cancer Research, 13(4), 1148–1154. PMID: 37168339; PMCID: PMC10164801.

45.

Israel

G. D.

(1992). Determining sample size. PEOD-6, Florida Cooperative Extension Services, Institue of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville [Preprint]. https://www.gjimt.ac.in/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/2_Glenn-D.-Israel_Determining-Sample-Size.pdf

46.

Ivankova

N. V.

Creswell

J. W.

Stick

S. L.

(2006). Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods, 18(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822(05282260

47.

İpek

Z. H.

Gözüm

AİC

Papadakis

Kallogiannakis

(2023). Educational applications of the ChatGPT AI system: Systematic review research. Educational Process International Journal, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.22521/edupij.2023.123.2

48.

Jarrah

A. M.

Wardat

Fidalgo

(2023). Using ChatGPT in academic writing is (not) a form of plagiarism: What does the literature say? Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies, 13(4). https://doi.org/10.30935/ojcmt/13572

49.

Javaid

Haleem

Singh

R. P.

Khan

I. H.

(2023). Unlocking the opportunities through ChatGPT tool towards ameliorating the education system. BenchCouncil Transactions on Benchmarks, Standards and Evaluations, 3(2), 100115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100115

50.

Jose

B. C.

Kumar

M. A.

UdayaBanu

Nagalakshmi

(2024). Assessing the effectiveness of adaptive learning systems in K-12 education. International Journal of Advanced IT Research and Development (IJAITRD), 1(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.69942/1920184/20240101/02

51.

A. N.

(2024, October 16). Understanding Likert scales: Advantages, limitations, and questions. entropik. https://www.entropik.io/blogs/understanding-likert-scales-advantages-limitations-and-questions

52.

Kabir

Shah

Haddad

Raper

D. M. S.

(2024). Introducing our custom GPT: An example of the potential impact of personalized GPT builders on scientific writing. World Neurosurgery, 193, 461–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2024.10.041

53.

Kamal

M. A. A.

Khaidzir

M. F. S.

(2024). Publish or perish: The impact of ChatGPT on future academics. Arab World English Journal, 1(1), 319–330. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/chatgpt.22

54.

Kamalov

Calonge

D. S.

Gurrib

(2023). New era of artificial intelligence in education: Towards a sustainable multifaceted revolution. Sustainability, 15(16), 12451. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151612451

55.

Kavitha

Joshith

V. P.

Sharma

(2024). Beyond text: ChatGPT as an emotional resilience support tool for Gen Z – A sequential explanatory design exploration. E-Learning and Digital Media, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/20427530241259099

56.

Khalifa

Albadawy

(2024). Using artificial intelligence in academic writing and research: An essential productivity tool. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine Update, 5, 100145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpbup.2024.100145

57.

Khampusaen

(2025). The impact of ChatGPT on academic writing skills and knowledge: An investigation of its use in argumentative essays. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 18(1), 963–988. https://doi.org/10.70730/PGCQ9242

58.

Knott

Rao

A. H.

Summers

Teeger

(2022). Interviews in the social sciences. Nature Reviews Methods Primers, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-022-00150-6

59.

Kohli

S. S.

(2023). Using chat GPT to write scientific manuscripts: Frame of reference. Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics, 7(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2023.001

60.

Kökver

Pektaş

H. M.

Çelik

(2024). Artificial intelligence applications in education: Natural language processing in detecting misconceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 3035–3066. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12919-1

61.

Leech

N. L.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

(2007). A typology of mixed methods research designs. Quality & Quantity, 43(2), 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3

62.

Liu

Kong

Merve

(2025). ChatGPT applications in academic writing: A review of potential, limitations, and ethical challenges. Arquivos brasileiros de oftalmologia, 88(3). https://doi.org/10.5935/0004-2749.2024-0269

63.

Livberber

Ayvaz

(2023). The impact of artificial intelligence in academia: Views of turkish academics on ChatGPT. Heliyon, 9(9), e19688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19688

64.

C. K.

(2023). What is the impact of ChatGPT on education? A rapid review of the literature. Education Sciences, 13(4), 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13040410

65.

Liu

(2005). The technology acceptance model. In Advanced topics in End user computing, volume 4 (1st ed, Vol. 16, pp. 59–72). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/9781591404743.ch006.ch000

66.

Malmqvist

Hellberg

Möllås

Rose

Shevlin

(2019). Conducting the pilot study: A neglected part of the research process? Methodological findings supporting the importance of piloting in qualitative research studies. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 160940691987834. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919878341

67.

Marzuki

Rusdin

Darwin

Indrawati

(2023). The impact of AI writing tools on the content and organization of students’ writing: EFL teachers’ perspective. Cogent Education, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186x.2023.2236469

68.

McIntosh

T. R.

Liu

Susnjak

Watters

Halgamuge

M. N.

(2024). A culturally sensitive test to evaluate nuanced GPT hallucination. IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 5(6), 2739–2751. . https://doi.org/10.1109/tai.2023.3332837 .

69.

Mhlanga

(2023). Open AI in education, the responsible and ethical use of ChatGPT towards lifelong learning. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4354422

70.

Miller

Thompson

(2022). Challenges and ethical considerations of AI in academic publishing. International Journal of Academic Integrity, 18(4), 234–250.

71.

Moussaoui

(2024). Enhancing writing quality and self-efficacy beliefs through process-oriented task-based instruction and multiple feedback forms. Journal of Educational and Psychological Studies, 18(1), 96–116. https://doi.org/10.53543/jeps.vol18iss1pp96-116

72.

Nazari

Shabbir

M. S.

Setiawan

(2021). Application of artificial intelligence powered digital writing assistant in higher education: Randomized controlled trial. Heliyon, 7(5), e07014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07014

73.

Negoiță

D. O.

Popescu

M. A. M.

(2023). The use of artificial intelligence in education. International Conference of Management and Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.56177/11icmie2023.43

74.

Obaid

O. I.

Ali

A. H.

Yaseen

M. G.

(2023). Impact of ChatGPT on scientific research: Opportunities, risks, limitations, and ethical issues. Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics, 4(4), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.52866/ijcsm.2023.04.04.002

75.

Ortiz-Garces

Govea

Andrade

R. O.

Villegas-Ch

(2024). Optimizing chatbot effectiveness through advanced syntactic analysis: A comprehensive study in natural language processing. Applied Sciences, 14(5), 1737. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14051737

76.

Parray

A. A.

Inam

Z. M.

Ramonfaur

Haider

S. S.

Mistry

S. K.

Pandya

A. K.

(2023). ChatGPT and global public health: Applications, challenges, ethical considerations and mitigation strategies. Global Transitions, 5, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glt.2023.05.001

77.

Phillipson

(2012). English: From British empire to corporate empire. Sociolinguistic Studies, 5(3), 441–464. https://doi.org/10.1558/sols.v5i3.441

78.

Piizzi

Vavallo

Lazzo

Dimola

Zazzera

(2024). A natural language processing model for the development of an Italian-language chatbot for public administration. Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning. Preprints. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202406.1859.v1

79.

Rahimi

Talebi Bezmin Abadi

(2023). ChatGPT and publication ethics. Archives of Medical Research, 54(3), 272–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcmed.2023.03.004

80.

Ray

P. P.

(2023). ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope. Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems, 3, 121–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003

81.

Rolfe

Freshwater

Jasper

(2001). Critical reflection for nursing and helping professions: A user’s guide. Palgrave.

82.

Royani

N. I.

Sihombing

M. R.

(2024). ChatGPT in the academic writing classroom. Esteem Journal of English Education Study Programme, 7(2), 630–638. https://doi.org/10.31851/esteem.v7i2.15615

83.

Salvagno

Taccone

F. S.

Gerli

A. G.

(2023). Can artificial intelligence help for scientific writing? Critical Care, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-023-04380-2

84.

Sandhu

H. S.

Arora

Brasch

Streiner

D. L.

(2019). Mental health stigma: Explicit and implicit attitudes of Canadian undergraduate students, medical school students, and psychiatrists. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 64(3), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1177/0706743718792193

85.

Saragih

(2025). Student perception of the advantages and challenges of using ChatGPT (artificial intelligence) for academic assignments. Journal of Information Technology, Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, 2(1), 16–22. https://explodingtopics.com/blog/chatgpt-users?utm_source=chatgpt.com

86.

Semrl

Feigl

Taumberger

Bracic

Fluhr

Blockeel

Kollmann

(2023). AI Language models in human reproduction research: Exploring ChatGPT’s potential to assist academic writing. Human Reproduction, 38(12), 2281–2288. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dead207

87.

Siegerink

Pet

L. A.

Rosendaal

F. R.

Schoones

J. W.

(2023). ChatGPT as an author of academic papers is wrong and highlights the concepts of accountability and contributorship. Nurse Education in Practice, 68, 103599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103599

88.

Song

(2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: Assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14, 1260843. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843

89.

Sullivan

Kelly

McLaughlan

(2023). ChatGPT in higher education: Considerations for academic integrity and student learning. Journal of Applied Learning and Teaching, 6(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.37074/jalt.2023.6.1.17

90.

Susanti

Azizan

A. T.

(2025). Proceeding of international joint conference on UNESA enhancing writing skills through Chat GPT: a literature review enhancing writing skills through ChatGPT: A literature review. PIJCU, 2(2), https://proceeding.unesa.ac.id/index.php/pijcu

91.

Švab

Klemenc-Ketiš

Zupanič

(2023). New challenges in scientific publications: Referencing, artificial intelligence and ChatGPT. Slovenian Journal of Public Health, 62(3), 109–112. https://doi.org/10.2478/sjph-2023-0015

92.

Taecharungroj

(2023). What can ChatGPT do?” analyzing early reactions to the innovative AI chatbot on twitter. Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 7(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/bdcc7010035

93.

Ullah

Baber

M. U.

Arshad

(2024). Assessing the transformative influence of ChatGPT on research practices among scholars in Pakistan. Mesopotamian Journal of Big Data, 2024, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.58496/mjbd/2024/001

94.

Van Dis

E. A. M.

Bollen

Zuidema

Van Rooij

Bockting

C. L.

(2023). ChatGPT: Five priorities for research. Nature, 614(7947), 224–226. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-023-00288-7

95.

van Niekerk

Delport

P. M. J.

Sutherland

(2025). Addressing the use of generative AI in academic writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100342

96.

Venkatesh

Morris

M. G.

Davis

G. B.

Davis

F. D.

(2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

97.

Von Garrel

Mayer

(2023). Artificial intelligence in studies - use of ChatGPT and AI-based tools among students in Germany. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-02304-7

98.

Wibowo

G. A.

Rahman

Anis

(2023). The impact of ChatGPT use on the quality of academic support for students. Technology and Society Perspectives (TACIT), 1(3), 132–138. https://doi.org/10.61100/tacit.v1i3.69

99.

Zhang

Zhao

Zhou

Kim

J. H.

(2024). Do you have AI dependency? The roles of academic self-efficacy, academic stress, and performance expectations on problematic AI usage behavior. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00467-0

Is ChatGPT the Future of Academic Writing? A Sequential Explanatory Study to Explore Generative Conversational AI as an Academic Writing Support Tool for Research Scholars

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References