The interaction between the concepts of character attachment, agency, and choice in a video game narrative was investigated using BioWare’s Mass Effect trilogy. Posts on a BioWare forum discussing the depiction of their player characters in the ending sequences of Mass Effect 3, the final game in the trilogy, were downloaded and analyzed using thematic analysis. Players demonstrated emotional attachment for the characters and narrative and expected to see the consequences of their choices play out, as in the previous games. Furthermore, players conflated winning the game with achieving a narratively satisfactory ending for the game world and its characters indicating emotional consequences for players that developers should consider when designing games with a high degree of player choice and agency. However, for some players character attachment is incongruous as they described Shepard as “acting out of character,” which needs further research.
AsheD. D.McCutcheonL. E. (2001). Shyness, loneliness, and attitude towards celebrities. Current Research in Social Psychology, 6, 124-133.
2.
AtkinsB. (2003). More than a game: The computer game as fictional form. Manchester, England: Manchester University Press.
3.
BackeH. J. (2012). Narrative rules? Story logic and the structures of games. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 27, 243-260.
4.
BanksJ.BowmanN. D. (2013, October). Close intimate playthings? Understanding player-avatar relationships as a function of attachment, agency, and intimacy. Paper presentation at IR14, the annual conference of the Association of Internet Researchers, Denver, CO.
5.
BanksJ.BowmanN. D. (2016). Avatars are (sometimes) people too: Linguistic indicators of parasocial and social ties in player–avatar relationships. New Media & Society, 18, 1257-1276.
6.
BizzocchiJ.Ben LinM. A.TanenbaumJ. (2011). Games, narrative and the design of interface. International Journal of Arts and Technology, 4, 460-479. doi:10.1504/IJART.2011.043445
7.
BizzocchiJ.TanenbaumJ. (2012). Mass Effect 2: A case study in the design of game narrative. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32, 393-404.
8.
BowmanN.SchultheissD.SchumannC. (2012). “I’m attached, and I’m a good guy/gal!” How character attachment influences pro- and anti-social motivations to play massively multiplayer online role-playing games. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 15, 169-174.
9.
BraunV.ClarkeV. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77-101.
10.
BurgessJ.JonesC. (2018). Media fans’ alignment with branding: A rich and under-explored research domain. Journal of New Business Ideas & Trends, 16(1), 1-15.
11.
CarvalhoV. (2015). Leaving earth, preserving history: Uses of the future in the mass effect series. Games and Culture, 10, 127-147.
12.
CohenJ. (2001). Defining identification: A theoretical look at the identification of audiences with media characters. Mass Communication and Society, 4, 245-264.
13.
CohenJ. (2003). Parasocial breakups: Measuring individual differences in response to the dissolution of parasocial relationships. Mass Communication and Theory, 6, 191-202.
14.
CoulsonM.BarnettJ.FergusonC.GouldR. L. (2012). Real feelings for virtual people: Emotional attachments and interpersonal attraction in video games. Psychology of Popular Media Culture, 1, 176-184.
15.
CrawfordC. (2005). Chris Crawford on interactive storytelling. Berkeley, CA: New Riders.
16.
DaviaultC. (2012). Does game playing experience have an impact on the player-PNPC relationship?Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 32, 441-446.
17.
Egenfeldt-NielsenS.SmithH. J.ToscaP. S. (2008). Understanding video games: The essential introduction. New York, NY: Routledge.
18.
ErmiL.MäyräF. (2005, June). Fundamental components of the gameplay experience analysing immersion. Proceedings of the DiGRA Conference Changing views: Worlds in Play, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/06276.41516.pdf
FrascaG. (2003, November). Ludologists love stories, too: Notes from a debate that never took place. Proceedings of the DiGRA Conference Level Up, Utrecht, Netherlands. Retrieved from https://www.ludology.org/articles/Frasca_LevelUp2003.pdf
21.
GlasR. (2012). Battlefields of negotiation. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Amsterdam University Press.
22.
GoodmanL. (2015). Disappointing fans: Fandom, fictional theory and the death of the author. Journal of Popular Culture, 48, 662-676.
HjorthL. (2011). Games and gaming. London, England: Berg.
25.
HuangL.YehY. (2016). Mediated enactive experience versus perceived mastery experience: An enhancing mechanism versus a mediator of character attachment and internal political efficacy in serious games. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1085-1096.
26.
HunterR. (2011). Erasing “property lines”: A collaborative notion of authorship and textual ownership on a fan Wiki. Computers and Composition, 28, 40-56.
27.
JenkinsH. (2006). Fans, bloggers and gamers: Exploring participatory culture. New York: New York University Press.
28.
JenkinsH. (2012). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture (Updated Twentieth Anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
29.
JenningsS. (2016). Co-creation and the distributed authorship of video games. In ValentineK. D.JensenL. J. (Eds.), Examining the evolution of gaming and its impact on social, cultural, and political perspectives (pp. 123-146). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
30.
JohnsonD. (2015). Animated frustration or the ambivalence of player agency. Games and Culture, 10, 593-612.
31.
JørgensenK. (2010). Game characters as narrative devices. A comparative analysis of Dragon Age: Origins and Mass Effect 2. Eludamos. Journal for Computer Game Culture, 4, 315-331.
32.
JoyceL. (2015). Creating collaborative criteria for agency in interactive narrative game analysis. Computer Games Journal, 4, 47-58.
33.
JuulJ. (2013). The art of failure: An essay on the pain of playing video games. Cambridge: MIT Press.
34.
KlimmtC.HefnerD.VordererP. (2009). The video game experience as “true” identification: A theory of enjoyable alterations of players’ self-perception. Communication Theory, 19, 351-373.
35.
LankoskiP. (2011). Player character engagement in computer games. Games and Culture, 6, 291-311.
36.
LewisM. L.WeberR.BowmanN. D. (2008). They may be pixels, but they’re MY pixels: Developing a metric of character attachment in role-playing video games. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 11, 515-518.
MallonB. (2007). Towards a taxonomy of perceived agency in narrative game-play. Computers in Entertainment, 5(4), 1-15.
39.
MallonB.LynchR. (2014). Stimulating psychological attachments in narrative games. Engaging players with game characters. Simulation & Gaming, 45, 508-527.
40.
MoserC.FangX. (2015). Narrative structure and player experience in role-playing games. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 31, 146-156.
41.
MurielD.CrawfordG. (2018). Video games as culture. Abingdon, England: Routledge.
42.
MurrayJ. H. (1997). Hamlet on the holodeck: The future of narrative in cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: Free Press.
O’DonnellC. (2012). The North American game industry. In ZackariassonP.WilsonT. (Eds.), The video game industry formation, present state and future (pp. 99-115), New York, NY: Routledge.
45.
PearceC. (2002). Emergent authorship: The next interactive revolution. Computers & Graphics, 26, 21-29.
46.
PostigoH. (2007). Of mods and modders: Chasing down the value of fan-based digital game modifications. Games and Culture, 2, 300-313.
47.
RiedlM. O. (2010, June18). A comparison of interactive narrative system approaches using human improvisational actors. Proceedings of 5th International Conference Foundations of Digital Games: Intelligent Narrative Technologies III Workshop, Monterey, CA.
48.
RigbyS.RyanR. M. (2011). Glued to games: How video games draw us in and hold us spellbound. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
49.
RyanM. (2009). From narrative games to playable stories: Towards a poetics of interactive narrative. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 1, 43-59.
50.
SalenK.ZimmermanE. (2004). Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. Cambridge: MIT Press.
51.
TanenbaumK.TanenbaumJ. (2010). Agency as commitment to meaning: Communicative competence in games. Digital Creativity, 21(1), 11-17.
52.
TreptreS.ReineckeL. (2010). Avatar creation and video game enjoyment: Effects of life-satisfaction, game competitiveness and identification with the avatar. Journal of Media Psychology, 22, 171-184.
53.
WardN. (2008). Mass(ively) effect(ive): Emotional connections, choice, and humanity. Eludamos: Journal for Computer Game Culture, 2, 289-292.
54.
WirmanH. (2007, September). “I am not a fan, I just play a lot”: If power gamers aren’t fans, who are?Proceedings of the 2007 DiGRA International Conference: Situated Play, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. Retrieved from http://www.digra.org/wp-content/uploads/digital-library/07311.40368.pdf
55.
ZakowskiS. (2014). Time and temporality in the Mass Effect series: A narratological approach. Games and Culture, 9, 58-79.
