There are three approaches to the Kuhn-Polanyi relationship: their ideas are the same, can be reconciled, or profoundly diverge. This article seeks to show that both share a tradition of paideia. Kuhn espouses scientific revolutions while Polanyi stresses reform and continuity within a Platonic worldview.
Amsterdamski, S. ( 1980). Paradigma. In R. Romano (Ed.), Enciclopedia (Vol. 10, p. 347). Torino, Italy: Giulio Einaudi.
2.
Cohen, B. ( 1976). The eighteenth-century origins of the concept of scientific revolution. Journal of the History of Ideas, 37, 257-260.
3.
Crombie, A. (Ed.). (1963). Scientific change. New York, NY: Basic Books .
4.
Gelwich, R. (Ed.). (1997). From Polanyi to the 21st century: Proceedings of the Centennial Conference, Kent State University. Biddeford, ME: University of New England. These cyclostyled proceedings were distributed to participants. Hereafter Gelwich.
5.
Grant, P. ( 1974). Michael Polanyi: The Augustinian component. New Scholasticism, 48, 438-463.
6.
Greshake, G. ( 1973). Changes in the model of salvation in the history of theology [Der Wandel der Erlösungsvorstellung in der Theologiegeschichte]. In L. Scheffczyk (Ed.), Salvation and emancipation [Erlösung und Emanzipation]. (pp. 69-101). Freiburg , Germany: Herder.
7.
Gutting, G. (Ed.). (1980). Paradigms and revolution. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
8.
Jaeger, W. ( 1939-1944). Paideia: The ideals of Greek culture (Vols. 1-3). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
9.
Kuhn, T.S. ( 1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10.
Kuhn, T.S. ( 1977). The essential tension. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
11.
Kuhn, T.S. ( 2000). The road since structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
12.
Küng, H., & Tracy, D. (Eds.). (1989). Paradigm change in theology . New York, NY: Crossroad.
13.
Lakatos, I., & Musgrave, A. (Eds.). (1978). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14.
MacIntyre, A. ( 1977). Epistemological crises, dramatic narrative and the philosophy of science. Monist, 60, 453-472.
15.
MacIntyre, A. ( 1988). Whose justice? Which rationality?Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
16.
MacIntyre, A. ( 1990). Three rival versions of moral enquiry. London, England: Duckworth.
17.
Pepper, S.T. ( 1973). Metaphor in philosophy. In P. Wiener (Ed.), Dictionary of the history of ideas (Vol. 3, p. 200). New York, NY: Charles Scribner.
18.
Polanyi, M. ( 1958). Personal knowledge. London, England: Rout-ledge and Kegan Paul.
19.
Polanyi, M. ( 1969). Knowing and being. London, England: Rout-ledge and Kegan Paul.
20.
Polanyi, M. ( 1974). Scientific thought and social reality. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
21.
Rentsch, Th. ( 1989). Paradigm [Paradigma]. In J. Ritter & K. Gründer (Eds.), Historical dictionary of philosophy [Historisches Wörterbuch der Philosophie] (Band 7, p. 78). Darmstadt, Germany: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
