Abrams, J.J. (Producer/Director). (2009). Star trek [Motion Picture]. United States: Paramount Pictures.
2.
Ang, I. ( 1985). Watching Dallas: Soap opera and the melodramatic imagination . New York, NY: Routledge.
3.
boyd, d. ( 2006). Friends, Friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1418/1336
4.
boyd, d. ( 2007). Why youth (heart) social network sites: The role of networked publics in teenage social life. In D. Buckingham (Ed.), The MacArthur Foundation series on digital learning- Youth, identity and digital media volume (pp. 119-142). Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
Bradner, E., Kellogg, W.A., & Erickson, T. ( 1999). The adoption and use of "Babble": A field study of chat in the workplace. In Proceedings of the Sixth European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 139-158). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.
6.
Carroll, B., & Landry, K. ( 2010). Logging on and letting out: Using online social networks to grieve and to mourn. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 341-349.
7.
Castells, M. ( 2001). The Internet galaxy: Reflections on the Internet, business, and society. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8.
Dutton, W., Helsper, E.J., & Gerber, M.M. ( 2009). The Internet in Britain: 2009. Oxford , England: Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford.
9.
Ellison, N.B., Steinfield, C., & Lampe, C. ( 2007). The benefits of Facebook "friends:" Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4), Article 1. Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/ellison.html
10.
Erickson, I. (IN PRESS). Documentary with ephemeral media: Curation practices in online social spaces. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society .
11.
Fiske, J. ( 1987). Television culture. New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
Gaver, W. ( 1996). Situating Action II: Affordances for Interaction: The Social Is Material for Design. Ecological Psychology, 8, 111-129.
13.
Gibson, J.J. ( 1986). The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
Goffman, E. ( 1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience . London, England: Harper & Row.
15.
Gross, R., & Acquisti, A. ( 2005, November). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2005 ACM workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society, Alexandria, VA.
16.
Ha, L., & James, E.L. ( 1998). Interactivity re-examined: A baseline analysis of early business websites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 42, 457-474.
17.
Hampton, K., Sessions, L., Her, E.J., & Rainie, L. ( 2009). Social isolation and new technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project .
18.
Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. ( 2002). The Internet in everyday life: An introduction. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 3-41). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
19.
Herring, S.C. ( 2004). Slouching toward the ordinary: Current trends in computer-mediated communication. New Media & Society, 6(1), 26-36.
20.
Herring, S.C., & Martinson, A. ( 2002, January). Designing for community-The effects of gender representation in videos on a web site. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 35th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences , Waikoloa, Big Island, HI.
21.
Hogan, B. (IN PRESS).The Presentation of Self in the Age of Social Media: Distinguishing Performances and Exhibitions online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society.
22.
Ifukor, P. (IN PRESS). "Elections" or "selections"? Blogging and Twittering the Nigerian 2007 General Elections. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society.
23.
Latzko-Toth, G. ( 2010). Metaphors of synchrony: Emergence and differentiation of online chat devices. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 362-374.
24.
Leiner, B.M., Cerf, V.G., David, D.C., Kahn, R.E., Kleinrock, L., Lynch, D.C., . . . Wolff, S.S. ( 1997). The past and future history of the internet. Communications of the ACM, 40, 102-108.
25.
Lewis, K., Kaufman, J., Gonzalez, M., Wimmer, A., & Christakis, N. (2008). Tastes, ties, and time: A new social network dataset using facebook.com. Social Networks , 30, 330-342.
26.
Nardi, B.A., Whittaker, S., & Bradner, E. ( 2000, December). Interaction and outeraction: Instant messaging in action. Paper presented at the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), Pennsylvania, PA.
27.
Norman, D.A. ( 1990). The design of everyday things. New York, NY: Basic Books.
28.
Park, H.W. ( 2003). Hyperlink network analysis: A new method for the study of social structure on the web. Connections, 25(1), 49-61.
29.
Quan-Haase, A. ( 2008). University students’ local and distant social ties: Using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 671-693.
30.
Quan-Haase, A., & Collins, J.L. ( 2008). "I’m there, but I might not want to talk to you": University students’ social accessibility in instant messaging. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 526-543.
31.
Quan-Haase, A., & Young, A.L. ( 2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 350-361.
32.
Rafaeli, S., & LaRose, R. (1993). Electronic bulletin boards and "public goods" explanations of collaborative mass media. Communication Research, 20, 277-277.
33.
Reed, A. ( 2005). "My blog is me": Texts and persons in UK online journal culture (and anthropology). Ethnos, 70, 220-242.
34.
Roberts, S., Dunbar, R., Pollet, T., & Kuppens, T. ( 2009). Exploring variation in active network size: Constraints and ego characteristics. Social Networks, 31, 138-146.
35.
Sanderson, J., & Cheong, P.H. ( 2010). Tweeting prayers and communicating grief over Michael Jackson online. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society , 30(5), 328-340.
36.
Shirky, C. ( 2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York, NY: Penguin Books.
37.
Sundén, J. ( 2003). Material virtualities: Approaching online textual embodiment . New York, NY: Peter Lang.
38.
Thelwall, M. ( 2004). Link analysis: An information science approach. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
39.
Tufekci, Z. ( 2008). Can you see me now? Audience and disclosure regulation in online social network sites. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 28(20), 20-36.
40.
Turkle, S. ( 1997). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet . New York, NY: Simon & Schuster .
41.
Turner, F. ( 2006). From counterculture to cyberculture. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
42.
Van Cleemput, K. ( 2010) "I’ll see you on IM, text or call you": A social network approach of adolescents’ use of communication media. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30, 75-85. doi:10.1177/0270467610363143
43.
Wajcman, J. ( 2008). Life in the fast lane? Towards a sociology of technology and time. British Journal of Sociology, 59(1), 59-77.
44.
Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2002). The Internet in everyday life. Oxford, England: Blackwell .
45.
Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Boase, J., Chen, W., Hampton, K., Isla de Diaz, I., & Miyata, K. ( 2003). The social affordances of the Internet for net-worked individualism. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication , 8(3). Retrieved from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol8/issue3/wellman.html
46.
Wellman, B., Quan-Haase, A., Witte, J., & Hampton, K. ( 2001). Does the internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 437-456.
47.
Wilks, Y. (Ed). (2010). Close engagements with artificial companions: Key social, psychological, ethical and design issues. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
48.
Woolgar, S. ( 1991). Configuring the user: The case of usability trials. In J. Law (Ed.), A sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 58-97). London , England: Routledge.
49.
Yardi, S., & boyd, d. (2010). Dynamic debates: An analysis of group polarization over time on Twitter. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 30(5), 316-327.
50.
Young, A.L., & Quan-Haase, A. (2009, June). Information revelation and internet privacy concerns on social network sites: A case study of Facebook . Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Communities and Technologies, University Park, PA.