Civil-Military Integration: The Politics of Outsourcing National Security

Abstract

The post 9/11 environment has been characterized by domestic policy actors being incorporated into a globalizing defense industrial sector through the concept of civil-military integration. From administration to administration, the push for increased civil-military integration has spread beyond its original boundaries and has reached the frontlines of the American military. This begs the question, can the market-driven logic of the commercial sector be integrated into the objectives and values of the noncivilian, military sector? More precisely, is civil-military integration the appropriate solution to the post 9/11 strategic shift? The purpose of this study is not to address the detailed merits or limitations of the increased reliance on private contractors. Rather, this study’s primary focus is to examine the policies that set into motion and continue to promote the cornerstone of civil-military integration: strategic outsourcing. This study argues that in today’s threat environment, the extent of civil-military integration poses unique challenges for U.S. strategic policy. With contactors on the battlefield, basic doctrinal issues emerge. The most basic of these is the notion that in a war zone military members are asked to risk their lives for their country. But, while people are willing to risk their lives for their country, they may not be willing to risk their lives for their company.

Keywords

civil-military integration strategic outsourcing defense reform initiative

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics. ( 2001). A blue-print for action final report. Washington, DC: DFI International.

Belasco, A. ( 2006, September 22). The cost of Iraq, Afghanistan, and other global war on terror operations since 9/11. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

Bennett, J. ( 2009, September 2). Carter: DoD plans must consider industry’s health. DefenseNews. Retrieved from http://www.defensenews.com/story.php?i=4261929

Defense Science Board. (2008, July). Creating an effective national security industrial base for the 21st century: An action plan for the coming crisis. Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology.

Defense Science Board. (2009, February). Buying commercial: Gaining the cost/schedule benefits for defense systems . Washington, DC: Office of the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition and Technology.

Department of Defense. (1997a). Defense reform initiative report. Washington, DC: Office of Secretary of Defense.

Department of Defense. (1997b). Secretary Cohen reshapes defense for the 21st century. Washington, DC: Office of Assistant Secretary of Defense, Public Affairs.

Department of Defense. (1998). Annual report to the President and Congress on defense reform. Washington, DC: Office of Secretary of Defense.

Department of Defense. (2001a, July 31). Overview of the defense reform initiative. Washington, DC: Office of Secretary of Defense.

10.

Department of Defense. (2001b). DRI transition report. Washington, DC: Office of Secretary of Defense.

11.

Francis, D. , Walther, R. , Brook, D. , & Hudgens, B. ( 2006, December 15). A comparative history of Department of Defense management reform from 1947 to 2005. Monterey, CA: Center for Defense Management Reform Naval Postgraduate School.

12.

Garamone, J. ( 2001, September 10). Rumsfeld attacks Pentagon bureaucracy, vows change (American Forces Press Service News Articles). Washington, DC: Office of Secretary of Defense.

13.

Garamone, J. ( 2009, May 23). Defense official outlines hurdles in defense acquisition reform (American Forces Press Service News Articles). Washington, DC: Office of Secretary of Defense.

14.

General Accountability Office. (2002a, October 25). Nonproliferation strategy needed to strengthen multilateral export control regimes. Washington, DC: Auhtor.

15.

General Accountability Office. (2002b, December). Defense management: New management reform program still evolving . Washington, DC: Author.

16.

General Accountability Office. (2007a, September). Defense business transformation: Achieving success requires a chief management officer to provide focus and sustained leadership. Washington, DC: Author.

17.

General Accountability Office. (2007b, May). Defense acquisitions: Improved management and oversight needed to better control DoD’s acquisition of services. Washington, DC: Author.

18.

General Accountability Office. (2008, March). Defense management: DoD needs to reexamine its extensive reliance on contractors and continue to improve management and oversight. Washington, DC: Author.

19.

Grasso, V. ( 2002, January 9). Defense acquisition reform: Status and current issues. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

20.

House Subcommittee on Government Efficiency and Financial Management on House Government Reform. (2003, June 25). Hearing on Defense Department restructuring. Washington, DC: Author.

21.

House Subcommittee on Military Readiness. ( 1999, March 2). Hearings on "DoD Competitive Sourcing: Questions About Goals, Pace, Risk of Key Reform Initiative" (Committee on Armed Services) . Washington, DC: Author.

22.

Miles, D. ( 2009, February 24). Obama nominates defense acquisition undersecretary (American Forces Press Service News). Washington, DC: Office of Under Secretary of Defense.

23.

The military-consumer complex. (2009, December 12). The Economist, p. 16.

24.

Office of Management and Budget. (2003, May 29). OMB Circular No. A-76 Revised. Washington, DC: Author.

25.

Office of Technology Assessment. (1995, September). Assessing the potential of civil-military integration: Selected case studies. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.

26.

Schwartz, M. ( 2009a, July 10). Defense acquisitions: How DoD acquires weapon systems and recent efforts to reform the process. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

27.

Schwartz, M. ( 2009b, September 29). The Department of Defense’s use of private security contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan: Background, analysis, and options for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.

28.

Senate Armed Services Committee. (2008, February 6). Hearing on "Fiscal Year 2009 Defense Authorization Request and Request for Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan." 111th Senate, 1st Session .

29.

Shanker, T. , & Schmitt, E. ( 2005, May 11). Rumsfeld seeks leaner army, and a full term. The New York Times, pp. A1, A15.

30.

Singer, P.W. ( 2003). Corporate warriors: The rise of the privatized military industry. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

31.

Singer, P.W. ( 2008). Bent but not broken: The military challenge for the next commander-in chief. Washington, DC: Brookings Institute.