This study explores some possibilities of social network analysis for studying adolescents’ communication patterns. A full network analysis was conducted on third-grade high school students (15 year olds, 137 students) in Belgium. The results pointed out that face-to-face communication was still the most prominent way for information to flow through the network. Interactions through communication media (e-mail, instant messaging, text messaging, mobile phone, and landline phone), however, supplemented this flow of information in a substantive way. Communication media use patterns were characterized by multiplexity and could be placed on a unidimensional scale indicating a media hierarchy. Close friends (strong ties) used all communication media at their disposal to connect with each other; students who were just friends (weak ties) preferred face-to-face communication and social network sites. In the discussion, some other possibilities of social network analysis for studying adolescents’ communication media are discussed.
Bagwell, C.L., Coie, J.D., Terry, R.A., & Lochman, J.E. ( 2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence . Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46, 280-305.
2.
Baym, N.K., Zhang, Y.B., & Lin, M.-C. (2004). Social interaction across media. New Media & Society, 6, 299-318.
3.
Boase, J. ( 2008). Personal networks and the personal communication system. Using multiple media to connect. Information, Communication & Society, 11, 490-508.
4.
Boase, J., Horrigan, J.B., Wellman, B., & Rainie, L. ( 2006). The strength of Internet ties (Pew Internet & American Life Project). Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2006/The-Strength-of-Internet-Ties.aspx?r=1
5.
Boneva, B.S., & Kraut, R.E. ( 2002). Email, gender, and personal relationships. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 372-403). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
6.
Boneva, B.S., Quinn, A., Kraut, R.E., Kiesler, S., & Shklovski, I. ( 2006). Teenage communication in the instant messaging era. In R. E. Kraut, M. Brynin, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones, and the Internet. Domesticating information technology (pp. 201-218). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Borgatti, S., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. ( 2002). Ucinet 6 for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis [Computer software]. Natick, MA: Analytic Technologies.
10.
Boyd, D.M., & Ellison, N.B. ( 2007). Social network sites: Definition, history and scholarship . Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html
11.
Brown, B.B., & Klute, C. ( 2003). Friendships, cliques, and crowds. In G. R. Adams & M. D. Berzonsky (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of adolescence (pp. 330-348). Malden, MA:: Blackwell.
12.
Brown, B.B., Mory, M.S., & Kinney, D. ( 1994). Casting adolescent crowds in a relational perspective: Caricature, channel and context. In R. Montemayor , G. R. Adams, & T. P. Gullotta (Eds.), Personal relationships during adolescence (pp. 123-167). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
13.
Bryant, A.J., Sanders-Jackson, A., & Smallwood, A.M.K. (2006). IMing, text messaging, and adolescent social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(2). Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol11/issue2/bryant.html
14.
Coleman, J.C. ( 1980). Friendship and the peer group in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 408-431). New York: John Wiley.
15.
Coleman, J.S. ( 1963). The adolescent society. The social life of the teenager and its impact on education. New York: Free Press.
16.
Cotterell, J. ( 2007). Social networks in youth & adolescence. London: Routledge.
17.
Cross, R., Borgatti, S., & Parker, A. ( 2001). Beyond answers: Dimensions of the advice network. Social Networks, 23, 215-235.
18.
de la Haye, K., Robins, G., Mohr, P., & Wilson, C. (in press). Obesity-related behaviors in adolescent friendship networks . Social Networks.
19.
Dunphy, D.C. ( 1963). The social structure of urban adolescent peer groups . Sociometry, 26, 230-246.
20.
Ennet, S.T., & Bauman, K.E. ( 1993). Peer group structure and adolescent cigarette smoking: A social network analysis. Journal of Health and Social Behavior , 34, 226-236.
21.
Ennet, S.T., & Bauman, K.E. ( 1996). Adolescent social networks: School, demographic and longitudinal considerations. Journal of Adolescent Research, 11, 194-215.
22.
Erikson, E.H. ( 1968). Identity, youth and crisis. New York : W.W. Norton.
23.
Garton, L., Haythornthwaite, C., & Wellman, B. ( 1997). Studying online social networks. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 3(1). Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol3/issue1/garton.html
24.
Grannovetter, M. ( 1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited . Sociological Theory, 1, 201-233.
25.
Grinter, R.E., & Elridge, M.A. ( 2001, September). Y do tngrs luv 2 txt msg?Paper presented at the Seventh European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work (ECSCW), Bonn, Germany.
26.
Grinter, R.E., & Palen, L. ( 2002, November). Instant messaging in teen life. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, New Orleans, LA.
27.
Hansell, S. ( 1985). Adolescent friendship networks and distress in school . Social Forces, 63, 698-715.
28.
Harter, S. ( 1999). The construction of the self. A developmental perspective . New York: Guilford Press.
29.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2001). Exploring multiplexity: Social network structures in a computer-supported distance learning class. Information Society, 17, 211-226.
30.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2003). Supporting distributed relationships: Relationship development and media use in two classes of Internet-based learners. Electronic Journal of Communication/ La Revue Electronique de Communication, 13(1). Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/013/1/01313.HTML
31.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2005). Social networks and internet connectivity effects. Information, Communication & Society, 8, 125-147.
32.
Haythornthwaite, C. ( 2007). Social networks and online community. In A. N. Joinson, K. Y. A. McKenna, T. Postmes, & U.-D. Reips (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Internet psychology (pp. 122-137). New York: Oxford University Press.
33.
Haythornthwaite, C., Wellman, B., & Garton, L. ( 1998). Work and community via computer-mediated communication . In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet. Intrapersonal, interpersonal and transpersonal implications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34.
Ishii, K. ( 2006). Implications of mobility: The uses of personal communication media in everyday life. Journal of Communication, 56, 346-365.
35.
Kim, H., Kim, G.J., Park, H.W., & Rice, R.E. ( 2007). Configurations of relationships in different media: FtF, email, instant messenger, mobile phone and SMS. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(4). Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol12/issue4/kim.html
36.
Koivusilta, L.K., Lintonen, T.P., & Rimpela, A.H. ( 2007). Orientations in adolescent use of information and communication technology: A digital divide by sociodemographic background, educational career, and health. Scandinavian Journal of Public Health, 35, 95-103.
37.
Kruskal, J.B., & Wish, M. ( 1978). Multidimensional scaling (Vol. 11). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
38.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., & Hitlin, P. ( 2005). Teens and technology (Pew Internet and American Life Project). Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2005/Teens-and-Technology.aspx?r=1
39.
Lenhart, A., Madden, M., Macgill, A.R., & Smith, A. ( 2007). Teens and social media (Pew Internet & American Life Project). Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2007/Teens-and-Social-Media.aspx?r=1
40.
Ling, R., & Yttri, B. ( 2006). Control, emancipation, and status. The mobile telephone in teens’ parental and peer relationships. In R. E. Kraut, M. Brynin, & S. Kiesler (Eds.), Computers, phones and the Internet. Domesticating information technology (pp. 219-234). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
41.
Livingstone, S., & Bober, M. ( 2003). UK children go online. Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://www.citizensonline.org.uk/site/media/documents/1521_UKCGO-final-report.pdf
42.
Madell, D., & Muncer, S. ( 2004). Back from the beach but hanging on the telephone? English adolescents’ attitudes and experiences of mobile phones and the Internet . CyberPsychology & Behavior, 7, 359-367.
43.
Marcia, J.E. ( 1980). Identity in adolescence. In J. Adelson (Ed.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (pp. 159-187). New York: John Wiley.
44.
McIver, J., & Carmines, E.G. (1981). Unidimensional scaling (Vol. 24). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE .
45.
Mesch, G. ( 2005). A study of adolescents’s online and offline social relationships (Oxford Internet Institute Report No. 8). Retrieved January 30, 2010, from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1308494#
46.
Mesch, G., & Talmud, I. ( 2006). Online friendship formation, communication channels, and social closeness. International Journal of Internet Science , 1, 29-44.
47.
Mesch, G.S. ( 2009). Social context and communication channels choice among adolescents. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 244-251.
48.
Monge, P.R., & Contractor, N.S. (2003). Theories of communication networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
49.
Neal, J.W. ( 2007). Why social networks matter: A structural approach to the study of relational aggression in middle childhood and adolescence. Child Youth Care Forum, 36, 195-211.
50.
Nichols, J.D., & White, J. ( 2001). Impact of peer networks on achievement of high school algebra students. Journal of Educational Research, 94, 267-273.
51.
Pearson, M., & Michell, L. ( 2000). Smoke rings: Social network analysis of friendship groups, smoking and drug-taking. Drugs: Education, Prevention and Policy, 7, 21-37.
52.
Quan-Haase, A. ( 2007). University students’ local and distant social ties. Using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Information, Communication & Society, 10, 671-693.
53.
Quan-Haase, A., Wellman, B., Witte, J.C., & Hampton, K. ( 2002). Capitalizing on the net. Social contact, civic engagement, and sense of community. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The Internet in everyday life (pp. 291-324). Oxford, UK: Blackwell .
54.
Robins, G., Pattison, P., Kalish, Y., & Lusher, D. ( 2007). An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 173-191.
55.
Robins, G., Snijders, T.A.B., Wang, P., Handcock, M., & Pattison, P. ( 2007). Recent developments in exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks, 29, 192-219.
56.
Ryan, A.M. ( 2001). The peer group as a context for the development of young adolescent motivation and achievement. Child Development, 72, 1135-1150.
57.
Stern, S.T. ( 2007). Instant identity. Adolescent girls and the world of instant messaging. New York: Peter Lang .
58.
Urberg, K.A., Degirmencioglu, S.M., Tolson, J.M., & Halliday-Scher, K. (1995). The structure of adolescent peer networks. Developmental Psychology, 31, 540-547.
59.
Urberg, K.A., Degirmencioglu, S.M., Tolson, J.M., & Halliday-Scher, K. (2000). Adolescent social crowds: Measurement and relationship to friendships. Journal of Adolescent Research, 15, 427-445.
60.
Valkenburg, P. ( 2004). Children’s responses tot the screen. A media psychological approach. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum .
61.
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. ( 1998). Social network analysis: Method and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
62.
Wellman, B. ( 1988). Thinking structurally. In B. Wellman & S. D. Berkowitz (Eds.), Social structures: A network approach (pp. 15-18). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
63.
Wellman, B. ( 1997). An electronic group is virtually a social network. In S. Kiesler (Ed.), Culture of the Internet (pp. 179-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
64.
Wellman, B., Hogan, B., Berg, K., Boase, J., Carrasco, J.-A., Rochelle, C., et al. (2005). Connected lives: The project. In P. Purcell (Ed.), Networked neighbourhoods (pp. 161-216). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
