The literature on the impact of urban form design on travel behavior reveals mixed results. Instead of interpreting this finding as an insufficient basis for warranting action, this article suggests that a precautionary approach be introduced. This approach should be based on two interdependent modes of knowing and doing to establish and evolve design exemplars in conjunction with discipline-based analytical exemplars. Even if trends, including the digitization of human life and society, peak oil and climate change turn out to have smaller negative effects than is currently anticipated, we will be ahead with more livable and sustainable urban forms.
Badoe, D.A., & Miller, E.J. ( 2000). Transportation-land-use interaction: Empirical findings in North America, and their implications for modeling. Transportation Research Part D, 5, 235-263.
2.
Bagley, M.N., & Mokhtarian, P.L. (2002). The impact of residential neighbourhood type on travel behaviour: A structural equations modeling approach . Annals of Regional Science, 6, 279-297.
3.
Cervero, R., & Duncan, M. ( 2003). Walking, bicycling and urban landscapes: Evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. American Journal of Public Health , 93, 1478-1483.
4.
Cervero, R., & Gorham, R. ( 1995). Commuting in transit versus automobile neighborhoods . Journal of the American Planning Association, 61, 210-225.
5.
Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. ( 1996). Travel demand and the three Ds: Density, diversity and design (Working Paper No. 674). Berkeley: Institute of Urban and Regional development, University of California.
6.
Deacon, T.W. ( 1997). The symbolic species. New York: W. W. Norton. Ellul, J. (1967). Métamorphose du bourgeois. Paris: Calmann-Lévy . Ellul, J. (1975). The new demons. New York: Seabury.
7.
Ewing, R. ( 1997). Is Los Angeles style sprawl desirable? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 107-126.
8.
Ewing, R., Haliyur, P., & Page, G. ( 1994). Getting around a traditional city, a suburban planned unit development, and everything in between. Transportation Research Record, 1466, 53-62.
9.
Gordon, P., & Richardson, H. (1997). Are compact cities a desirable goal? Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 95-106.
10.
Griffith, C. ( 2009). Urbanization: A critical human dimension of global environmental change: Introduction to the issue. UGEC Viewpoints, 2, 4.
11.
Handy, S.L. ( 1996). Methodologies for exploring the link between urban form and travel behavior. Transportation Research Record, 1400, 58-66.
12.
Hess, P.M., Moudon, A.V., Snyder, M.C., & Stanilov, K. ( 1999). Site design and pedestrian travel. Transportation Research Record, 1674, 9-19.
13.
Holtzclaw, J. ( 1994). Using residential patterns and transit to decrease auto dependence and costs. San Francisco: Natural Resources Defense Council.
14.
Jacobs, J. ( 1961). The death and life of great American cities. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: Vintage Books.
15.
Kitamura, R., Mokhtarian, P.L., & Laider, L. ( 1997). A microanalysis of land use and travel in five neighborhoods in the San Francisco Bay area. Transportation, 24, 125-158.
16.
Krizek, K.J. ( 2003). Residential relocation and changes in urban travel: Does neighborhood-scale urban form matter? Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 265-281.
17.
Lund, H. ( 2003). Testing the claims of new urbanism: Local access, pedestrian travel, and neighbouring behaviors. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69, 414-429.
18.
McNally, M.G., & Kulkarni, A. ( 1997). Assessment of influence of land use-transportation system on travel behavior. Transportation Research Record, 1607, 105-115.
19.
Messenger, T., & Ewing, R. ( 1996). Transit-oriented development in the sun belt. Transportation Research Record, 1552, 145-153.
20.
Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. ( 1989). Cities and automobile dependence: A sourcebook. Brookfield, VT: Gower Technical.
21.
Newman, P., & Kenworthy, J. ( 1999). Sustainability and cities: Overcoming automobile dependence . Washington, DC: Island Press.
22.
Parsons Brinkerhoff Quade & Douglas Inc. ( 1996, March). Influence of land-use mix and neighborhood design on transit demand (Unpublished report for TCRP H-1 project). Washington, DC: Transit Cooperative Research Program, Transportation Research Board.
23.
Pawlick, T. ( 2009). War in the country. Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Greystone Books.
24.
Schwanen, T., & Mokhtarian, P. (2005). What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transportation Research Part D, 10, 127-151.
25.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 1985). The growth of minds and cultures: A unified theory of the structure of human experience. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
26.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2000). The labyrinth of technology. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
27.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2005). Living in the labyrinth of technology. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
28.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2006a). Can the university escape from the labyrinth of technology? Part 1: Rethinking the intellectual and professional division of labor and its knowledge infrastructure. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 26, 171-177.
29.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2006b). Can the university escape from the labyrinth of technology? Part 2: Intellectual map making and the tension between breadth and depth . Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 26, 178-188.
30.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2006c). Can the university escape from the labyrinth of technology? Part 3: A strategy for transforming the profession, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 26, 189-203.
31.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2006d) Can the university escape from the labyrinth of technology? Part 4: Extending the strategy to medicine, the social sciences and the university . Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 26, 204-216.
32.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2009a). Rethinking engineering design and decision making in response to economic, social, and environmental crises. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29, 421-432.
33.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2009b). The anti-economy hypothesis. Part 1: From wealth creation to wealth extraction Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29, 48-56.
34.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2009c). The anti-economy hypothesis. Part 2: Theoretical roots . Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29, 57-65.
35.
Vanderburg, W.H. ( 2009d). The anti-economy hypothesis. Part 3: Toward a solution . Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 29, 66-74.
