The author argues economic analysis needs to be explicitly included in an overall theory of law and technology. Differing approaches to the economics of information are considered, and the copyright policy environment of the 1990s is taken as an example of how the lack of substantive economic analysis resulted in poor policy-making.
Bettig, R.V. ( 1996). Copyrighting culture: The political economy of intellectual property. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
2.
Drahos, P. ( 2002). Information feudalism: Who owns the knowledge economy?London: Earthscan.
3.
Electronic Frontier Foundation. (2008). Unintended consequences: Ten years under the DMCA. Retrieved December 1, 2009, from http://www.eff.org/wp/unintended-consequences-ten-years-under-dmca
4.
Geist, M. ( 2007). DMCA architect acknowledges need for a new approach. Retrieved December 1, 2009, from http://www.michaelgeist.ca/content/view/1826/
5.
Mosco, V. ( 1996). The political economy of communication: Rethinking and renewal. London: Sage.
6.
Perelman, M. ( 2002). Steal this idea: Intellectual property rights and the corporate confiscation of creativity. New York: Palgrave.
7.
Samuelson, P. ( 1999). Intellectual property and the digital economy: Why the anti-circumvention regulations need to be revised. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, 14, 519.
8.
Schiller, D. ( 2000). Digital capital: Networking the global market system . Cambridge: MIT Press.
9.
Thurow, L.C. ( 1997). Needed: A new system of intellectual property rights . Harvard Business Review, 75(5), 95-103.
10.
Trosow, S. ( 2003a). Fast-track trade authority and the free trade agreements: Implications for copyright law. Canadian Journal of Law & Technology, 2, 135-149.
11.
Trosow, S. ( 2003b). The illusive search for justificatory theories: Copyright, commodification and capital. Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence, 16, 217-241.