What Can Students Learn in an Extended Role-Play Simulation on Technology and Society?

Abstract

In a small course on technology and society, students participated in an extended role-play simulation for two weeks. Each student played a different adult character in a fictional community, which faces technological decisions in three scenarios set in the near future. The three scenarios involved stem cell research, nanotechnology, and privacy. Each student had an active role in two scenarios and served as an observer for the third. At the beginning, students were apprehensive, excited, and uncertain. During the first and second sessions, they experienced some frustration, but by the end, they were generally satisfied with the outcomes. Over the two weeks, students changed their definitions of success: Initially they tried to convince others to agree with their positions; at the end, they felt that a consensus represented success. In their final reflective essays, students reported that the role-play experience helped them learn to understand the perspectives of others.

Keywords

role-play simulation pedagogy technology and society course assessment qualitative analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Andrianoff, S.K. , & Levine, D.B. (2002). Role-playing in an object-oriented world. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 34(1), 121-125.

Asal, V. , & Blake, E.L. (2006). Creating simulations for political science education . Journal of Political Science Education, 2(1), 1-18.

Bartz, M. , & Deaton, R.J. (1996, June 23-26). Role playing in engineering education . Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Session 1532). Washington, DC.

Bernstein, J.L. , & Meizlish, D.S. (2003). Becoming Congress: A longitudinal study of the civic engagement implications of a classroom simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 34, 198-219.

Brown, K.M. (1994). Using role plays to integrate ethics into the business curriculum: A financial management example. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(2), 105-110.

Carnes, M.C. (2005). Inciting speech. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 37(2), 6-11.

Cooley, W.L. , Klinkhachorn, P. , McConnell, R.L. , & Middleton, N.T. (1991). Developing professionalism in the electrical-engineering classroom. IEEE Transactions on Education, 34, 149-154.

Didier, C. (2000). Engineering ethics at the Catholic University of Lille (France): research and teaching in a European context. European Journal of Engineering Education, 25, 325-335.

Easton, T. A. (Ed.). (2006). Taking sides: Clashing views on controversial issues in science, technology, and society (7th ed.). Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill/Dushkin.

10.

Herkert, J.R. (1997). Collaborative learning in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 447-462.

11.

Hertel, J.P. , & Millis, B.J. (2002). Using simulations to promote learning in higher education: An introduction. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

12.

Krain, M. , & Lantis, J.S. (2006). Building knowledge? Evaluating the effectiveness of the global problems summit simulation. International Studies Perspectives, 7, 395-407.

13.

Krain, M. , & Shadle, C.J. (2006). Starving for knowledge: An active learning approach to teaching about world hunger. International Studies Perspectives , 7(1), 51-66.

14.

Loui, M.C. (2000). Fieldwork and cooperative learning in professional ethics. Teaching Philosophy, 23, 139-156.

15.

Miles, M.B. , & Huberman, A.M. (1999). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

16.

Pearce, J.A. (2001, June 24-27). Constructing classroom role playing exercises. Proceedings, ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition (Session 2632). Albuquerque, NM.

17.

Prince, R.H. (2006). Teaching engineering ethics using role-playing in a culturally diverse student group. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 321-326.

18.

Seat, E. , & Lord, S.M. (1999). Enabling effective engineering teams: A program for teaching interaction skills. Journal of Engineering Education , 88, 385-390.

19.

Shaw, C.M. (2004). Using role-play scenarios in the IR classroom: An examination of exercises on peacekeeping operations and foreign policy decision making. International Studies Perspectives, 5(1), 1-22.

20.

Simonneaux, L. (2001). Role-play or debate to promote students' argumentation and justification on an issue in animal transgenesis. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 903-927.

21.

Teich, A. H. (Ed.). (2006). Technology and the future (10th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.