Determining Why Students Take More Science Than Required in High School

Abstract

This study reports the results of a survey of 405 high school students in a school district in the western United States. The data were used to determine why so many students take only the minimal science required for graduation. Key areas addressed included how science is taught; science literacy; science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM); science, technology, and society (STS); and who influences students to take science. Results were directed at how to motivate more students to continue science study beyond the required courses and how to improve the prospect of more students choosing STEM majors in higher education. Key conclusions included that no new science courses are needed to increase enrollments, but existing courses need to be taught differently, specifically with more labs and activities that create more interest and relevance for students. Furthermore, students need more awareness of good reasons for taking science. Last, science instruction must improve.

Keywords

STEM STS lab activities science curriculum

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bush, G.W. (2006, February). American competitive initiative: Leading the world in innovation. Domestic Policy Council Office of Science and Technology Policy. Retrieved from http://www.whitehouse.gov/stateoftheunion/2006/aci/

Crain, W. (1999). Theories of development: Concepts and applications . Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Council of Chief State School Officers (2007 ). State indicators of mathematics and science education 2005 . Retrieved from http://www.ccsso.org/projects/Science_and_Mathematics_Education_Indicators/

Froschauer, L. (2006). How can we attract students to STEM careers? NSTA reports. Arlington, VA: National Science Teachers Association.

Llewellyn, D. (2005). Teaching high school science through inquiry: A case study approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

National Academy of Sciences. (2006). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Center for Educational Statistics. ( 2000). [Tables and figures for elementary/secondary education.] Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/quicktables.

National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

National Science Teachers Association. (1993 ). Science/technology/ society: A new effort for providing appropriate science for all. In R. Yager (Ed.), The science, technology, society movement (pp. 3-5). Washington, DC: Author.

10.

Ndura, E. , Robinson, M. , & Ochs, G. (2003). Minority students in high school advanced placement courses. American Secondary Education, 32(1), 21-38.

11.

Perkins-Gough, D. (2007). Understanding the scientific enterprise. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 8-15.

12.

Schwab, J. , & Brandwein, P. (1960). The teaching of science. London : Oxford University Press.

13.

Seymour, E. (1995). Revisiting the "problem iceberg": Science, mathematics and engineering students still chilled out. Examining the causes of student attrition in science-based fields on a variety of campuses. Journal of College Science Teaching, XXIV(6), 392-400.

14.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

15.

Yager, R. (1988). Never playing the game. The Science Teacher, 55(9), 77.