The strengths and weaknesses of current energy planning can be attributed to the limited economic, social, and environmental contexts taken into account as a result of the current intellectual and professional division of labor. A preventive approach is developed by which the ratio of desired to undesired effects can be substantially improved. It takes into account supply-and demand-side options, renewable and nonrenewable sources, and net energy availability. Alternative energy must be considered within such a strategy, which carefully examines its effects on society and the biosphere. Intellectual barriers are identified, and ways of overcoming them are suggested.
Byrne, J., & Glover, L. (2005). Ellul and the weather. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25(1), 4-16.
2.
Byrne, J., & Toly, N. (2006). Energy as a social project: Recovering a discourse . In J. Byrne, N. Toly, & L. Glover (Eds.), Transforming power: Energy, environment, and society in conflict (pp. 1-32). New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishing.
3.
Daly, H.E., & Cobb, J.B., Jr. (1989). For the common good: Redirecting the economy toward community, the environment, and a sustainable future. Boston: Beacon.
4.
Goldemberg, J., Johansson, T., Reddy, A., & Williams, R. (1988). Energy for a sustainable world. New York: John Wiley.
5.
Karasek, R., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity, and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.
6.
Natural Resources Canada. (2004, June). Energy use data handbook, 1990 and 1996 to 2002. Ottawa : Author.
7.
Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high risk technology . New York: Basic Books.
8.
Vanderburg, W.H. (2000). The labyrinth of technology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
9.
Vanderburg, W.H. (2005). Living in the labyrinth of technology. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
10.
Vanderburg, W.H. (2006a). Can the university escape from the labyrinth of technology? Part 1: Rethinking the intellectual and professional division of labour and its knowledge infrastructure. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(3), 171-177.
11.
Vanderburg, W.H. (2006b). Can the university escape from the labyrinth of technology? Part 2: Intellectual map making and the tension between breadth and depth. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(3), 178-188.
12.
Vanderburg, W.H. (2006c). Can the university escape from the labyrinth of technology? Part 3: A strategy for transforming the profession. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(3), 189-203.
13.
Vanderburg, W.H. (2006d). Can the university escape from the labyrinth of technology? Part 4: Extending the strategy to medicine, the social sciences and the university. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 26(3), 204-216.
