Forums of public discussion on Internet Web sites have been promoted by some as having the potential to improve democracy through large increases in civic engagement. Such claims are scoffed at by others. To date, such forums tend to be found more on community networks and commercial Web sites than on sites owned by governments. We thus turn to an examination of forums hosted by a private New Jersey organization, to seek to understand the types and character of discussion taking place. Discussion of politics and government, especially at the local level, represented slightly more than one half of the postings. Participation in the forums, however, appeared limited to a small number of people.
Barney, D. (2000). Prometheus wired. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2.
Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31, 133-160.
3.
Bimber, B. (2003). Information and American democracy: Technology and the evolution of political power. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4.
Carroll, J., & Reese, D. D. (2002). Community collective efficacy: Structure and consequences of perceived capacities in the Blackburg Electronic Village. In Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1-10). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
5.
Carroll, J., & Rosson, M. B. (2001). Better home shopping or new democracy? Evaluating community network outcomes. In Proceedings of CHI 2001: Conference on human factors of computer systems (pp. 372-379). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
6.
Carroll, J., & Rosson, M. B. (2003). A trajectory for community networks. Information Society, 19, 381-393.
7.
Carroll, J., Rosson, M. B., Isenhour, P. L., Van Metre, C., Schafer, W. A., & Ganoe, C. H. (2001). MOOsburg: Multi-user domain support for a community network. Internet Research, 11(1), 65-73.
8.
Cliff, S. (2000). The e-democracy e-book: Democracy is online 2.0. Retrieved May 25, 2004, from www.publicus.net/ebook/%20edemebook.html
9.
Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
10.
Dyson, E., Gilder, G., Keyworth, G., & Toffler, A. (1994, August 22). Cyberspace and the American dream: A Magna Carta for the knowledge age. Retrieved September 23, 2002, from www.pff.org/position.html
11.
Ferber, P., Foltz, F., & Pugliese, R. (2003a). Bridging the quality divide in state legislatures: New Jersey leads by example. New Jersey Journal of Communications, 11(2), 164-178.
12.
Ferber, P., Foltz, F., & Pugliese, R. (2003b, August). Info tech and public participation: The impact of state legislative design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia.
13.
Ferber, P., Foltz, F., & Pugliese, R. (2003c). The politics of state legislature websites: Making e-government more participatory. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 23(3), 157-167.
14.
Ferber, P., Foltz, F., & Pugliese, R. (2005a). Electronic communication in the Arizona legislature: Homepage on the range. Review of State and Local Government, 37(2), 142-150.
15.
Ferber, P., Foltz, F., & Pugliese, R. (2005b). Interactivity versus interaction: What really matters for state legislature web sites?Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25(5), 402-411.
16.
Ferber, P., Foltz, F., & Pugliese, R. (2005c). The Internet and public participation: State legislature websites and the many definitions of interactivity. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25(1), 85-93.
17.
Greenberg, P. (2001, March). Legislators: You' ve got mail. State Legislatures. Retrieved May 25, 2004, from www.ncsl.org/%20programs/lis/nalit/pubslist.ht
18.
Grossman, L. (1995). The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age. New York: Viking.
19.
Harrison, T., & Stephen, T. (1999). Researching and creating community networks. Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the net. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research (pp. 221-241). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
20.
Harrison, T., & Zappen, J. P. (2005). Building sustainable community information systems: Lessons from a digital government project. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series; Vol. 89 Proceedings of the 2005 National Conference on Digital Government Research (pp. 145-150). Atlanta, GA: Digital Government Research Center.
21.
Kavanaugh, A., & Patterson, S. (2001, November). The impact of community computer network on social capital and community involvement. American Behavioral Scientist, 34(3), 496-509.
22.
Lawley, M., Summers, J., Koronios, A., & Gardiner, M. (2001). Critical success factors for regional community portals: A preliminary model. In Proceedings of ANZMAC' 01. Retrieved June 1, 2003, from http://130.195.95.71:8081/WWW/ANZMAC2001/anzmac/AUTHORS/pdfs/lawley2.pdf
23.
Margolis, M., & Resnick, D. (2000). Politics as usual: The “cyberspace revolution.” Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24.
Schuler, D. (1995, December). Creating public space in cyber-space: The rise of the new community networks. Internet World. Retrieved January 15, 2006, from www.scn.org/ip/commnet/%20iwdec.html
25.
Schuler, D. (1997). Let's partner as patriots: The future of democracy may lie in linking with community networks. Plus: ‘Vote Yes for Election Info Power,’ by Bill Buckel. American Libraries, 28(8), 60-63.
26.
Schuler, D. (in press). Community networks and the evolution of civic intelligence. AI and Society. Available at the Public Sphere Project, http://trout.cpsr.org/program/sphere/civic%20intelligence/civic-int-cn-preprint-final.pdf
27.
Warner, S, (2003, September 21). The talk of the town is online. The New York Times, Sect. 14, p. 7-7.
