Max Weber is seen by mainstream social scientists as a sociologist, social theorist, and theorist of bureaucracy. In this reassessment of Weber’s social science and its methodology, it is suggested that Weber can also be seen as a compelling early 20th-century critic of science and technology. The theme of technology, and Weber’s ambivalence about it, is approached through a discussion of his notion of disenchantment. In the modern, disenchanted world, social scientists are compelled to choose the values that guide research, but research is constrained by the technocratic requirements of large, bureaucratic institutions that sponsor and fund it. The article asks whether Weber’s notion of individual values is still applicable in the context of social science in the early 21st century. In a line of thought that can be traced to Postman and Ellul, it is asked whether the choices social scientists make can puncture the dense web of bureaucratic-technological rationality of which Weber was critical.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andrew, E. (1999). Closing the iron cage: The scientific management of work and leisure. Montreal, Canada: Black Rose Books .
2.
Antliff, M. (1993). Inventing Bergson: Cultural politics and the Parisian avant-garde. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
3.
Aristotle. (1977). Politics (E. Barker, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press . (Original work published 345 B.C.)
4.
Baudrillard, J. (1987). Modernity . Canadian Journal of Social and Political Thought, 2(3), 63-74 .
5.
Beetham, D. (1988). Max Weber and the theory of modern politics (2nd ed.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
6.
Berger, J. (1988). Ways of seeing. London: Penguin .
7.
Bergson, H. (1960). Time and free will. New York: Harper & Row .
8.
Braverman, H. (1988). Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the 20th century. New York: Monthly Review Press .
9.
Brietbart, E. (Director). (1982). Clockwork [Motion picture]. Los Angeles: California Newsreel .
Creager, A., Lunbeck, E., & Schiebinger, L. (Eds.). (2001). Feminism in twentieth century science, technology and medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press .
12.
Curtis, M. (1981). The great political theories, Vol. 2. New York: Avon Books .
13.
Day, R., Beiner, R., & Mascuilli, J. (Eds.). (1988). Democratic theory and technological society. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe .
14.
Ellul, J. (1964). The technological society (J. Wilkinson, Trans.). New York: Vintage Books .
15.
Foucault, M. (1993). Archeology of knowledge (A. M. Sheridan-Smith, Trans.). New York: Barnes & Noble . (Original work published 1969)
16.
Franklin, U. (1992). The real world of technology. Toronto, Canada: CBC Massey Lectures, Anansi .
17.
Gabel, J. (1975). False consciousness: An essay on reification (M. Thompson & K. Thompson, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell . (Original work published 1962)
18.
Germain, G. (1993). A discourse on disenchantment: Reflections on politics and technology. Albany, NY: SUNY Press .
19.
Germain, G. (1995). Revenge of the sacred: Technology and reenchantment. In A. Horowitz & T. Maley (Eds.), The barbarism of reason: Max Weber and the twilight of enlightenment (pp. 248-267). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
20.
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action (T. Mc-Carthy, Trans.). Boston: Beacon Press . (Original work published 1981)
21.
Hekman, S. (1995). Max Weber and post-positivist social theory. In A. Horowitz & T. Maley (Eds.), The barbarism of reason: Max Weber and the twilight of enlightenment (pp. 267-287). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
22.
Kahler, E. (1988). The vocation of science. In P. Lassman & I. Velody (Eds.), Max Weber’s science as a vocation (pp. 35-46). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
23.
Kontos, A. (1995). The world disenchanted, and the return of gods and demons. In A. Horowitz & T. Maley (Eds.), The barbarism of reason: Max Weber and the twilight of enlightenment (pp. 223-248). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
24.
Lassman, P., & Velody, I. (Eds.). (1988). Max Weber on science, disenchantment and the search for meaning. In Max Weber’s “Science as a vocation” (pp. 139-169). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
25.
Lukacs, G. (1968). History and class consciousness (R. Livingstone, Trans.). London: Merlin Press . (Original work published 1923)
26.
Maley, T. (1995). The politics of time: Subjectivity and modernity in Max Weber. In A. Horowitz & T. Maley (Eds.), The barbarism of reason: Max Weber and the twilight of enlightenment (pp. 139-168). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
27.
Marcuse, H. (1982). Some social implications of technology. In A. Arato (Ed.), The essential Frankfurt School reader (pp. 138-163). New York: Continuum .
28.
Marks, J. (1983). Science and the making of the modern world. New York: Heinemann .
29.
Marx, K. (1977a). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Marx and Engels: Collected Works, Vols. 1 and 2 (pp. 394-487). Moscow, Russia: International Publishers . (Original work published 1898)
30.
Marx, K. (1977b). Wages, prices and profits. In Marx and Engels: Collected Works, Vols. 1 and 2 (pp. 31-77). Moscow: International Publishers . (Original work published 1898)
31.
Mills, A., & Simmons, T. (1999). Reading organization theory: A critical approach. Toronto, Canada: Garamond Press .
32.
Misgeld, D. (1986). Modernity and social science: Habermas and Rorty . Philosophy and Social Criticism, 4(11).
33.
Nietzsche, F. (1966). On the genealogy of morals. In W. Kaufman (Trans.), The basic writings of Nietzsche (pp. 149-299). New York: Random House . (Original work published 1887)
34.
Nietzsche, F. (1974). The gay science (W. Kaufmann, Trans.). New York: Random House . (Original work published 1882)
35.
Noble, D. (1979). America by design: Science, technology and the rise of corporate capitalism. New York: Knopf .
36.
Noble, D. (1986). Forces of production: The social history of industrial automation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
37.
Oakes, G. (1987). Max Weber and the Southwest German school: The genesis of the concept of the historical individual. In W. Mommsen & J. Osterhammel (Eds.), Max Weber and his contemporaries (pp. 434-446). London: Allen Unwin .
38.
Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Knopf .
39.
Simmel, G. (1968). The conflict of modern culture. New York: Teachers College Press .
40.
Strong, T. (1995). Max Weber and the bourgeoisie. In A. Horowitz & T. Maley (Eds.), The barbarism of reason: Max Weber and the twilight of enlightenment (pp. 113-139). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
41.
Taylor, F. (1967). The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper & Row .
42.
Warren, M. (1995). Nietzsche and Weber: When does reason become power? In A. Horowitz & T. Maley (Eds.), The barbarism of reason: Max Weber and the twilight of enlightenment (pp. 68-99). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
43.
Weber, M. (1949a). Objectivity in social science and social policy. In E. Shils & H. Finch (Trans., Eds.), Methodology of the social sciences (pp. 49-112). New York: The Free Press . (Original work published 1904)
44.
Weber, M. (1949b). The meaning of ethical neutrality. In E. Shils & H. Finch (Trans., Eds.), Methodology of the social sciences (pp. 1-47). New York: The Free Press . (Original work published 1904)
45.
Weber, M. (1958). The Protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism (T. Parsons, Trans.). New York: Charles Scribner . (Original work published 1903)
46.
Weber, M. (1975a). Religious rejections of the world and their directions. In H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 323-359). New York: Oxford University Press .
47.
Weber, M. (1975b). Roscher and Knies: The logical problems of historical economics. New York: The Free Press .
48.
Weber, M. (1975c). Science as a vocation. In H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: Essays in sociology (pp. 129-159). New York: Oxford University Press .
49.
Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (G. Roth & C. Wittich, Eds.). Berkeley: University of California Press .
50.
Whimster, S. (1987). The secular ethic and the culture of modernism. In S. Whimster & S. Lash (Eds.), Max Weber, rationality and modernity (pp. 259-292). London: Allen Unwin .
51.
Wolfe, E. (1988). Max Weber’s ethical criticism and the problem of metaphysics. In P. Lassman & I. Velody (Eds.), Max Weber’s science as a vocation (pp. 123-137). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press .
52.
Wolin, S. (1995). Legitimation, method and the politics of theory. In A. Horowitz & T. Maley (Eds.), The barbarism of reason: Max Weber and the twilight of enlightenment (pp. 287-310). Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press .
