Representations and Uses of the Intranet: A Comparative Case Study

Abstract

The article focuses on Intranet technology as the result of overlapping negotiations among social actors inside organizations. Such negotiations are aimed at establishing and embedding specific relations and representations of work, communication, and learning into the technological artifact. Two case studies are presented to analyze practices and processes of implementation and use of the Intranet. The fieldwork, carried out in two companies in Italy and the United Kingdom, shows how specific contexts and organizational histories can affect such processes. Despite the “optimistic” imagery associated with Intranet technology and the high expectations about its communicative and economic efficiency, the article points out many constraints in the process of implementation and use. Company history and culture, skills and work groups, and use of other technologies and media are relevant factors to account for the current use of the two systems and their low degree of integration into everyday working and communicative practices.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. E. Bijker & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205-224). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bijker, W. E. (1995). Of bicycles, bakelites and bulbs. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Bijker, W. E., & Law, J. (Eds.). (1992). Shaping technology, building society: Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1996). Organizational learning and communities-of-practice. Toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. In M. D. Cohen & L. S. Sproull (Eds.), Organizational learning (pp. 58-82). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (1998). Organizing knowledge. California Management Review, 40(3), 90-111. Retrieved November 2002 from http://www.slofi.com/other.htm

Curry, A., & Stancich, L. (2000). The Intranet—An intrinsic component of strategic information management? International Journal of Information Management, 20(4), 249-268.

Flichy, P. (1996). L'innovazione tecnologica [The technological innovation]. Milan: Feltrinelli.

Holtz, S. (1997). The Intranet advantage. Emeryville, CA: Ziff-Davis.

Lamb, R. (1999). Using Intranets: Preliminary results from a socio-technical study (Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Science). Retrieved from http://www.computer.org/proceedings/hicss/0001/00015/00015055.PDF

10.

Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning. Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Law, J., & Hassard, J. (Eds.). (1991). Actor-network theory and after. Oxford: Blackwell.

12.

Nielsen, J. (1997). The difference between Intranet and Internet design. Retrieved February 2001 from http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9709b.html

13.

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-442.

14.

Orlikowski, W. J., & Yates, J. (1994). Genre repertoire—The structuring of communicative practices in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39(4), 541-574.

15.

Silverstone, R. (1994). Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.

16.

Suchman, L. (1996). Constituting shared workspaces. In Y. Engestrom & D. Middleton (Eds.), Cognition and communication at work (pp. 35-60). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

17.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

18.

Wenger, E., McDermott, R., & Snyder, C. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice. A guide to managing knowledge. Harvard, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

19.

Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139-148.

20.

Yates, J. A., & Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). Genres of organizational communication—A structurational approach to studying communication and media. Academy of Management Review, 17(2), 299-326.

21.

Yates, J. A., & Van Maanen, J. (2001). Information technology and organizational transformation. History, rhetoric and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.