Web sites of the 50 state legislatures are evaluated on five criteria: content, usability, interactivity, transparency, and audience. An overall quality score for each site was computed. The evaluation revealed a wide range of quality in the sites, including that of features or aspects that could possibly foster citizen participation. The higher rated sites help define “best practices” in this regard and provide suggestions as to how other states' sites might make improvements and possibly increase participation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Alexander, J., & Tate, M. A. (1999). Web wisdom: How to evaluate and create information quality of the Web. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2.
Bachrach, P. (Ed.). (1971). Political elites in a democracy. Atherton, CA: Atherton Press.
3.
Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4.
Bimber, B. (1998). The Internet and political transformation: Populism, community, and accelerated pluralism. Polity, 31(1), 133-160.
5.
Cronin, T. E. (1989). Direct democracy: The politics of initiative, referendum, and recall. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
6.
Dahl, R. A. (1982). Dilemmas of pluralist democracy: Autonomy vs. control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
7.
Dahl, R. A. (1985). Controlling nuclear weapons: Democracy versus guardianship. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
8.
Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
9.
Demchak, C. C., Friis, C., & La Porte, T. M. (1998). Reflections on configuring public agencies in cyberspace: A conceptual investigation. In I. M. Snellen & W. B. H. J. van de Donk (Eds.), Public administration in an information age: A handbook. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
10.
Demchak, C. C., Friis, C., & La Porte, T. M. (2000). Webbing governance: National differences in constructing the public face. In G. D. Garson (Ed.), Handbook of public information systems. New York: Marcel Dekker.
11.
Dyson, E., Gilder, G., Keyworth, G., & Toffler, A. (1994, August 22). Cyberspace and the American dream: A Magna Carta for the knowledge age. Available from http://www.pff.org/position.html
12.
Faber, L. (1998). The Internet design project: The best of graphic art on the Web. New York: Universe Publishing.
13.
Ferber, P., Foltz, F., & Pugliese, R. (2002, August 30). The politics of state legislature Websites: An evaluation of content and design. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston.
14.
Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and deliberation: New directions for democratic reform. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
15.
Foltz, F. A. (1999). Five arguments for increasing public participation in making science policy. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 19(2), 117-127.
16.
Gant, M. M., & Luttbeg, N. R. (1991). American electoral behavior. Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.
17.
Gray, D. (1999). Looking good on the Web. Scottsdale, AZ: Coriolis Group.
Lowi, T. (1979). The end of liberalism. New York: Norton.
24.
Madison, J. (1961). Federalist#10. In J. E. Cooke (Ed.), The federalist (pp. 56-65). Hanover, NH: Wesleyan University Press. (Original work published 1787)
25.
Miller, J. (1987). “Democracy is in the streets”: From Port Huron to the siege of Chicago. New York: Simon & Schuster.
26.
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
